RE : Common vs. Shared

2005-05-12 Thread LERBSCHER Jean-Pierre
-Message d'origine- De : Ron Heeb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : vendredi 6 mai 2005 18:18 À : tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Objet : RE: Common vs. Shared my understanding comes from this book i got: 'common is responsible for classes that are used by Tomcat and publicly

Re: RE : Common vs. Shared

2005-05-12 Thread Nikola Milutinovic
LERBSCHER Jean-Pierre wrote: -Message d'origine- De : Ron Heeb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : vendredi 6 mai 2005 18:18 À : tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Objet : RE: Common vs. Shared my understanding comes from this book i got: 'common is responsible for classes that are used

Re: Common vs. Shared

2005-05-12 Thread Dakota Jack
I have not read all the responses, but: Bootstrap | System | Common / \ Catalina Shared / \ Webapp1 Webapp2 ... On 5/5/05, Michael Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am quite sure this has been asked and answered

Re: Common vs. Shared

2005-05-12 Thread Gabriel Belingueres
Yes, it works this way for javax.mail.Session too. You need to put mail.jarand activation.jar in lib/common so as you can find the Session from JNDI. On 5/6/05, Michael Echerer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ron Heeb wrote: my understanding comes from this book i got: 'common is responsible for

RE: Common vs. Shared

2005-05-06 Thread Ron Heeb
my understanding comes from this book i got: 'common is responsible for classes that are used by Tomcat and publicly available to all Web apps'. shared is like common, except that 'developers can place their own classes and JAR files into the shared class loader domain'. developers shouldn't

Re: Common vs. Shared

2005-05-06 Thread Michael Echerer
Ron Heeb wrote: my understanding comes from this book i got: 'common is responsible for classes that are used by Tomcat and publicly available to all Web apps'. shared is like common, except that 'developers can place their own classes and JAR files into the shared class loader domain'.

Re: Common vs. Shared

2005-05-05 Thread Larry Meadors
Common is available globally to the server, and to all of the web-applications. Shared is available globally, but only to all of the web-applications. IMO, both are bad places to put stuff unless you *really need* to. Larry On 5/5/05, Michael Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am quite

RE: Common vs. Shared

2005-05-05 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: Michael Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Common vs. Shared What is the difference between the /common/ and /shared/ I understand this is a class loader issue, and I have read the comments in catalina.properties. But have you read the actual documentation? In

RE: Common vs. Shared

2005-05-05 Thread Michael Oliver
-0341 *Note new email changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 1:29 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Common vs. Shared From: Michael Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Common vs. Shared