Re: [tor-dev] Next version of the algorithm

Ola Bini writes: > Hi George, > > Sorry I've been slow to answer and send more info - was spending all > day Saturday and Sunday, and this week I'll be in all day meetings. > > Anyway, just to avoid confusion - After getting the algorithm to the > latest stage you saw

Re: [tor-dev] Next version of the algorithm

Chelsea Komlo writes: > Hi George, > > We were having a similar discussion about what to include in the "receive > new consensus" action. > > We currently have three actions to remove dead/unused guards. They are: > >1. Marking guards that are not listed in the

Re: [tor-dev] Next version of the algorithm

Hi George, Sorry I've been slow to answer and send more info - was spending all day Saturday and Sunday, and this week I'll be in all day meetings. Anyway, just to avoid confusion - After getting the algorithm to the latest stage you saw below, we started work on implementing it to simulate it.

Re: [tor-dev] Two major improvements to the Tor Metrics back-end

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/01/16 18:05, Karsten Loesing wrote: > Hello list, > > as some of you may have noticed, Tor Metrics had some trouble > updating its aggregate data lately, and the issues there are by no > means completely gone now. > > But I managed to tweak

Re: [tor-dev] Next version of the algorithm

Hi George, We were having a similar discussion about what to include in the "receive new consensus" action. We currently have three actions to remove dead/unused guards. They are: 1. Marking guards that are not listed in the latest consensus as "bad" 2. Remove guards that have been dead

Re: [tor-dev] Next version of the algorithm

Ola Bini writes: > Hi again, > > Here is the newest version of the algorithm: > https://gist.github.com/olabini/343da01de8e01491bf5c > Thanks! Looks better! I think we are reaching the point that we need good simulations and actually running and stepping through the

Re: [tor-dev] Existing Tor Guard Selection Algorithm

Reinaldo Junior writes: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 7:55 AM, George Kadianakis > wrote: > >> Chelsea Komlo writes: >> >> > Hi George, >> > >> > Thanks for your help with this! >> > >> > We wrote up our high-level