Re: [tor-dev] Detailed algorithm

Hi, Thanks for the review. > Maybe we also need to exclude USED_GUARDS from these two lists? Good point, we should definitely do that. > Not sure if this is part of this algorithm, or it's actually another helper > algorithm that is called when a consensus arrives. I feel it might be cleaner >

Re: [tor-dev] Detailed algorithm

Ola Bini writes: > OK, with your feedback and thinking a bit more about it, here is a > revision of the algorithm from yesterday. I think we are starting to > get close so we will rip out the original simulation code and > implement something that matches this now.

Re: [tor-dev] Detailed algorithm

> Hey, > > So - thinking through your comments and thoughts, I realized that the > better way to proceed was to describe the algorithm, and then put it > into a proposal format. The following is updated with most of your > comments and should be a bit clearer. I decided to remove #241 again, >