Brendan Miller wrote:
I'm tempted
Feel free.
Bye, Thomas.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-user-unsubscr...@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: torque-user-h...@db.apache.org
Thomas Vandahl wrote:
The getItemsJoinPurchaseOrder()-method also creates a new copy of
PurchaseOrder for every line of Item. This is something I wanted to
address in 4.0 anyway.
Just one additional comment:
Torque doesn't care much how many object copies of the same database
record exist in
One way of getting rid of temptations is yielding.
Afterwards you just run the unit tests and tell us how they turned out :)
Best regards,
Álvaro.
From: Brendan Miller bmil...@dotster.com
To: Apache Torque Users List torque-user@db.apache.org
Sent: Friday,
Actually, I must credit Oscar Wilde for the first sentence.
From: Alvaro Coronel alvarocorone...@yahoo.com
To: Apache Torque Users List torque-user@db.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 9:37:13 PM
Subject: Re: Correct way to getRelatedObjects with
Brendan Miller wrote:
Is there a way I can pre-populate the Items' aPurchaseOrder to the
object I start with (po)?
This will not provide you with the same instance, but your PurchaseOrder
should have a method called getItemsJoinPurchaseOrder() (or similar)
which will populate your items with
Thomas Fischer wrote:
The only way to achieve this in general would be modifying the object.vm
template which generatates the get${relCol} method.
I would believe that the behaviour you describe would make sense
generally. Any opinions on that from other people ? By doing this one
would
Thanks for the comments/interest. In the interim, I'm tempted
to add
public List#if($enableJava5Features)$className#end get${relCol}JoinThis()
to Object.vm...
Brendan
I'm tempted
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 05:55:19PM +0100, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
Brendan Miller wrote:
Is there a way I can
The only way to achieve this in general would be modifying the object.vm
template which generatates the get${relCol} method.
I would believe that the behaviour you describe would make sense
generally. Any opinions on that from other people ? By doing this one
would increase coupling between
Hi Thomas,
as an user / programmer I would expect parent.getChildren().getParent() to
return the original parent object. Thus I would agree that it feels natural to
set the parent of the children upon retrieval of those children.
Regards,
Hidde.
- Thomas Fischer fisc...@seitenbau.net
Maybe the subject makes sense. Let me explain.
I have two tables, PURCHASE_ORDER and ITEM. ITEM has a foreign key to
PRUCHASE_ORDER. Thus, the generated BasePurchaseOrder class has a
getItems() method that returns all the items associated with a PurchaseOrder.
I find myself with code in the
10 matches
Mail list logo
