On Apr 17, 2006, at 12:36 PM, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
Yes, you can still do that. The name in the schema and the name in
the Torque configuration have nothing to do with the real name of
the database. This is usually specified in the JDBC-URL only. The
other two names are just used to handle
As I said below, you and Thomas are correct except for the creation
of the database. If you want torque to create it, the name in the
schema.xml file needs to be the same as the one specified in your
connection URL.
cheers,
h.
On Apr 18, 2006, at 11:54 AM, Guy Galil wrote:
All you need
I took a quick look at Hibernate a while back and came away with the
impression that it is strongly tied to the complexity of Enterprise
Java Beans. It simplifies EJB operations but still requires a lot of
manual bookkeeping and coding to get started.
So, IMHO, Torque was better because it lets
