Re: [Toybox] Stat %Z - What are valid values?

2017-01-21 Thread Rich Felker
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 03:18:28PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > > Or if it's signed, that's -1346458162 which would be... sometime in the > > 1930's? hmmm... "./date -D %s -d -1346458162" is failing under glibc, > > and failing _differently_ under musl. (Wheee.) > > > > /me goes down tangent

Re: [Toybox] Stat %Z - What are valid values?

2017-01-21 Thread Rob Landley
On 12/30/2016 04:01 PM, enh wrote: > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Rob Landley wrote: >> On 12/30/2016 01:39 PM, enh wrote: >>> 1928-04-26 17:31:55.746667836 18446744072394174731 >> >> Really we can partially blame posix here for not specifying whether >> time_t is signed or