On 2022-06-03 09:43:31, enh via Toybox wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 9:27 AM Rob Landley wrote:
>
> On 6/2/22 19:41, enh wrote:
> > Oh, yeah, I think *especially* for macOS where pretty much everyone is
> always on
> > the latest version anyway, unless your Mac
On 2022-06-03 11:37:52, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 6/2/22 19:48, David Seikel wrote:
> > On 2022-06-02 17:41:09, enh via Toybox wrote:
> >>Oh, yeah, I think *especially* for macOS where pretty much everyone is
> >>always on the latest version anyway, unless your Mac equivalent of the
> >>
On 6/3/22 11:43, enh wrote:
> There was a tentative fourth use case: back before Apple switched from
> bash to
> zsh I thought they might eventually show an interest in a finished toysh,
> but
> they did bash->zsh the same way Ubuntu went bash->dash and Canonical
> showed a
>
fwiw, github doesn't support FreeBSD runners. they also don't support older
versions of macOS than "oldest supported by Apple":
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-github-hosted-runners/about-github-hosted-runners#supported-runners-and-hardware-resources
there's probably more value to us
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 9:27 AM Rob Landley wrote:
> On 6/2/22 19:41, enh wrote:
> > Oh, yeah, I think *especially* for macOS where pretty much everyone is
> always on
> > the latest version anyway, unless your Mac equivalent of the seven year
> rule is
> > "support the oldest macOS release that
On 6/2/22 19:48, David Seikel wrote:
> On 2022-06-02 17:41:09, enh via Toybox wrote:
>>Oh, yeah, I think *especially* for macOS where pretty much everyone is
>>always on the latest version anyway, unless your Mac equivalent of the
>>seven year rule is "support the oldest macOS release
On 6/2/22 19:41, enh wrote:
> Oh, yeah, I think *especially* for macOS where pretty much everyone is always
> on
> the latest version anyway, unless your Mac equivalent of the seven year rule
> is
> "support the oldest macOS release that still gets security backports", there's
> no reason to do
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 5:48 PM David Seikel
wrote:
> On 2022-06-02 17:41:09, enh via Toybox wrote:
> >Oh, yeah, I think *especially* for macOS where pretty much everyone is
> >always on the latest version anyway, unless your Mac equivalent of the
> >seven year rule is "support the
On 2022-06-02 17:41:09, enh via Toybox wrote:
>Oh, yeah, I think *especially* for macOS where pretty much everyone is
>always on the latest version anyway, unless your Mac equivalent of the
>seven year rule is "support the oldest macOS release that still gets
>security backports",
Oh, yeah, I think *especially* for macOS where pretty much everyone is
always on the latest version anyway, unless your Mac equivalent of the
seven year rule is "support the oldest macOS release that still gets
security backports", there's no reason to do this. It's pretty rare they
add anything
On 6/2/22 12:43, enh via Toybox wrote:
> 10.15 is currently the oldest macOS release that's still getting
> security updates (probably until the end of 2022, if history is any
> guide). Without this, toybox built on newer versions will by default
> target that version.
>
> Tested by adding -v and
10.15 is currently the oldest macOS release that's still getting
security updates (probably until the end of 2022, if history is any
guide). Without this, toybox built on newer versions will by default
target that version.
Tested by adding -v and seeing that the "sdk" in use changed from
12 matches
Mail list logo
