Re: [Toybox] Some questions re: init...

2014-01-05 Thread Rob Landley
On 01/01/14 03:26, ibid...@gmail.com wrote: I was looking over init, and noticed some things that seemed possibly less than optimal, as well as one detail that seemed illogical. I haven't done any cleanup on this one yet. It could be doing anything... First, the oddity: p = getenv(TERM);

Re: [Toybox] Some questions re: init...

2014-01-05 Thread ibid . ag
On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 11:49:31AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: On 01/01/14 03:26, ibid...@gmail.com wrote: I was looking over init, and noticed some things that seemed possibly less than optimal, as well as one detail that seemed illogical. I haven't done any cleanup on this one yet. It could

Re: [Toybox] Some questions re: init...

2014-01-05 Thread Rob Landley
On 01/05/14 20:31, ibid...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 11:49:31AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: On 01/01/14 03:26, ibid...@gmail.com wrote: I was looking over init, and noticed some things that seemed possibly less than optimal, as well as one detail that seemed illogical. I haven't

Re: [Toybox] Some questions re: init...

2014-01-05 Thread David Seikel
On Mon, 06 Jan 2014 00:07:51 -0600 Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote: On 01/05/14 20:31, ibid...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 11:49:31AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: I'm pretty happy just hardwiring in TERM=linux if it's not already set. (Although possibly this is the shell's