Re: [Toybox] fun with vfork

On 10/13/2016 03:25 AM, Josh Gao wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Rob Landley > wrote: > > So... no? I think? Is there a way _I_ can tag this? (I can't do my own > vfork prototype because I can't #undef the one I get out of unistd.h

Re: [Toybox] fun with vfork

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Rob Landley wrote: > > So... no? I think? Is there a way _I_ can tag this? (I can't do my own > vfork prototype because I can't #undef the one I get out of unistd.h and > that's a fairly generic header. It's sad I can't redo function > prototypes

Re: [Toybox] fun with vfork

On 10/12/2016 12:09 PM, David R. Hedges wrote: > For what it's worth, your example (and the resulting symptom) seem to > fall squarely in this undefined territory from the vfork manpage / POSIX > description: >> the behavior is undefined if the process created by vfork() [..] calls >> any other