Re: [Toybox] [landley/toybox] Add -0 to env. (8ab2d8a)

On 05/26/2017 10:23 AM, technosaurus wrote: > Should this be |xprintf("%s%c", *ev, '\n'*!(toys.optflags_0));| ??? Oops. (Legitimate typo, adjacent keys.) I tested env -0 and env without -0 before checking it in, but that turns _any_ flag into -0, which I didn't check. :) Thanks, Rob

Re: [Toybox] [PATCH 1/1] add pathchk

No, i do not have use case for this. I've implemented pathchk because it was on roadmap, had a decent spec and was small enough to do in a couple of evenings. I'm happy to contribute, but most of the stuff on the roadmap is either huge or in pending. I'm not sure i have enough time to do

Re: [Toybox] chrt.c cleanup

On 05/26/2017 10:54 AM, enh wrote: >> Sigh I agree with this in principle (although I would have gone the >> other way and enforced periods), > > happy to go the other way too; i only removed them because the current > majority was periodless. > > (i haven't been able to guess whether it's

Re: [Toybox] [PATCH 1/1] add pathchk

On 05/26/2017 11:21 AM, Ilya Kuzmich wrote: > Signed-off-by: Ilya Kuzmich > --- > tests/pathchk.test | 85 ++ > toys/posix/pathchk.c | 95 > > 2 files changed, 180