[Toybox] [PATCH] docs: stop referring to xflush() after its removal.

2024-01-22 Thread enh via Toybox
--- www/code.html | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) From 8921c9672a32f7f2e67f8c3bd57fd1bf298abb55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Elliott Hughes Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:06:24 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] docs: stop referring to xflush() after its removal. --- www/code.html | 1 - 1 file changed,

Re: [Toybox] incorrect output from grep -w --color

2024-01-22 Thread Rob Landley
On 1/17/24 18:57, Rob Landley wrote: > On 1/17/24 15:16, Peter Collingbourne via Toybox wrote: > Thanks. Digging into it... Looks like I screwed up --color when adding the bucket sort logic. (I haven't got regression tests for --color, because unless I'm exactly matching the ascii escape

[Toybox] [PATCH] xwrap: implement xputs() like xputc().

2024-01-22 Thread enh via Toybox
Obviously I could have gone the other direction and made xputc() use xferror() like xputs() did, but given that xferror() is only used in vi, and not obviously meaningful there, I'm assuming that xferror() probably won't last... Also remove an obsolete comment that applied to xflush() but not