On 12/16/2012 11:12:59 AM, Elie De Brauwer wrote:
All,
In my previous patch, the pif shouldn't be stored inside the
GLOBAL(), it
should be just a regular global variable. In attach a patch which
corrects this.
Ok, I finally took a proper look at this, and I don't understand why
can't
On 12/23/2012 02:45:57 PM, Elie De Brauwer wrote:
On 12/23/2012 09:42 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
On 12/16/2012 11:12:59 AM, Elie De Brauwer wrote:
All,
In my previous patch, the pif shouldn't be stored inside the
GLOBAL(), it
should be just a regular global variable. In attach a patch which
On 12/23/2012 11:44:27 PM, David Seikel wrote:
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 23:25:46 -0600 Rob Landley r...@landley.net
wrote:
On 12/23/2012 08:45:07 PM, David Seikel wrote:
Like rm'ing something that does not exist, the end result is
the
same, except for the useless error.
Using the
On 12/16/2012 11:31:49 AM, David Seikel wrote:
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 16:54:24 +0100 Elie De Brauwer
eliedebrau...@gmail.com wrote:
The LSB specification of killall says A killall process never kills
itself (but may kill other killall processes).
The current implementation of killall does not
Hi all,
The LSB specification of killall says A killall process never kills
itself (but may kill other killall processes).
The current implementation of killall does not adhere to this rule, with
the patch in attach killall will adhere to this rule.
Before:
All,
In my previous patch, the pif shouldn't be stored inside the GLOBAL(),
it should be just a regular global variable. In attach a patch which
corrects this.
gr
E.
On 12/16/2012 04:54 PM, Elie De Brauwer wrote:
Hi all,
The LSB specification of killall says A killall process never kills
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 16:54:24 +0100 Elie De Brauwer
eliedebrau...@gmail.com wrote:
The LSB specification of killall says A killall process never kills
itself (but may kill other killall processes).
The current implementation of killall does not adhere to this rule,
with the patch in attach
