On 04/07/2017 11:50 AM, enh wrote:
> Yeah, but that's a big job for the future. I am root and can spin up a
> new emulator instance and throw it away afterwards at very little cost
> (for x86/x86-64). So it's still useful in the usual "half an eye is
> better than no eye" sense.
Oh sure, I'm
Yeah, but that's a big job for the future. I am root and can spin up a new
emulator instance and throw it away afterwards at very little cost (for
x86/x86-64). So it's still useful in the usual "half an eye is better than
no eye" sense.
On Apr 7, 2017 09:47, "Rob Landley"
On 04/03/2017 10:35 AM, enh wrote:
>
> Parsing file(1) output isn't a good way to determine file system type
> anyway.
The mount tests (which there need to be s many more of, there's
comments in mount.c about that) are one of the category of "tests really
needing mkroot" because:
A)