Tracker 0.12 in Ubuntu Precise Pangolin doesn't seem to be indexing any
file contents at all these days - not even words in plain text files.
But I see in tracker-miner-fs.log :
29 Feb 2012, 21:18:57: Tracker: tracker-backend.vala:84:
Tracker.Sparql.Backend.query_async(): 'SELECT ?s WHERE { ?s
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 09:44 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 01/03/12 08:39, Karl Relton wrote:
Tracker 0.12 in Ubuntu Precise Pangolin doesn't seem to be indexing any
file contents at all these days - not even words in plain text files.
But I see in tracker-miner-fs.log :
29 Feb 2012
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 15:31 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 01/03/12 10:47, Karl Relton wrote:
That certainly looks like a broken install.
Out of interest, can you start the tracker-extract process manually and
does it fix the issue?
/usr/libexec/tracker-extract -v 3
Yes
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 23:19 +, Karl Relton wrote:
I've found out some more - the tracker-extract process is in fact being
started (by dbus), but for some reason the initial call to it is getting
an unknown interface error. Subsequent calls to it (while it is still
running), will work
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 12:23 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
I believe I have diagnosed and proposed a fix for the problem. Please
see https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671314 for a full write
up and proposed patch that fixes it.
Thank you for investigating this fully, great patch.
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 10:45 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 07/03/12 09:58, Karl Relton wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 12:23 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
I believe I have diagnosed and proposed a fix for the problem. Please
see https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671314 for a full
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 10:50 +, Karl Relton wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 10:45 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
For tracker-miner-web.c I am concerned by the comment at line 193:
/* No need to RequestName again as already done by the parent
TrackerMiner object */
Yes
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 15:18 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 07/03/12 19:24, Karl Relton wrote:
The only miner that uses tracker-miner-web.c in the current source tree
(as far as I can see) is the Flickr miner. So I compiled that and
started poking it.
It does indeed show the problematic
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 07:27 +0100, Björn Johansson wrote:
Hi all,
When turning on the computer, the miners dont seem to start.
bjorn@bjorn-UL30A:~$ tracker-control
Found 153 PIDs…
Store:
27 Mar 2012, 07:12:48: ✗ Store - Unavailable
Miners:
27 Mar 2012,
Hi all
Trackers odt extraction doesn't seem to be the full text. From what I
can see, it is only storing words in paragraphs using 'heading' styles
(any of 'heading' of 'heading1', 'heading2' etc.). Text in other
paragraphs (e.g. using 'Default' or 'Text body' is not being indexed.
Is this
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 15:43 +0100, Karl Relton wrote:
Hi all
Trackers odt extraction doesn't seem to be the full text. From what I
can see, it is only storing words in paragraphs using 'heading' styles
(any of 'heading' of 'heading1', 'heading2' etc.). Text in other
paragraphs (e.g. using
On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 17:58 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 16:56 +0100, Karl Relton wrote:
Looking at the code in tracker-extract-oasis.c, it seems unnecessarily
picky to me.
For the main text content (ODF elements text:p text:h) it is looking
at whether styles
My first patch inadvertently set the wrong tag type - this patch has that
corrected.
As per thread starting at
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/tracker-list/2012-April/msg00012.html
here is a proposed patch that simplifies (and improves) the indexing of
oasis text files (.odt files). With
Any thoughts, comments?
Good, bad, ugly?
My first patch inadvertently set the wrong tag type - this patch has that
corrected.
As per thread starting at
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/tracker-list/2012-April/msg00012.html
here is a proposed patch that simplifies (and improves) the
This patch upgrades the oasis extractor to extract text out of
graphic/drawing files (typical LibreOffice file extension .odg).
Karl
--- tracker-0.14.0.orig/src/tracker-extract/tracker-extract-oasis.c
2012-04-24 10:14:53.565748834 +0100
+++
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 12:01 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 24/04/12 10:09, Karl Relton wrote:
Any thoughts, comments?
Good, bad, ugly?
Hello Karl, given you're submitting multiple patches (versions) here for
multiple issues, can you create branches with your latest work for each
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 12:01 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 24/04/12 10:09, Karl Relton wrote:
Any thoughts, comments?
Good, bad, ugly?
Hello Karl, given you're submitting multiple patches (versions) here for
multiple issues, can you create branches with your latest work for each
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 12:01 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 24/04/12 10:09, Karl Relton wrote:
Any thoughts, comments?
Good, bad, ugly?
Hello Karl, given you're submitting multiple patches (versions) here for
multiple issues, can you create branches with your latest work for each
On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 15:34 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 01/10/12 14:27, Björn Johansson wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
has anyone thought of writing a unity dash lens for tracker?
Unity, what's that? :)
On a serious note, there are few resources currently on the project to
maintain it,
For me, some kind of genuine integration with zeitgeist, especially when
searching the index.
In
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/tracker-list/2014-September/msg00046.html
Philip talked about not just indexing meta-data or content, but also
being wise about the context/relationship of the data
20 matches
Mail list logo
