:25 pm
Subject: Re: [TriLUG] Interesting issue
To: Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list trilug@trilug.org
Thanks for the nomination Jon. I'll gladly issue an RTFM to anyone
who asks things that I consider to be a dumb and obvious questions.
However, from some of my own posts you might see
:-)
Jon
- Original Message -
From: Mark Freeze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, February 17, 2007 5:33 pm
Subject: Re: [TriLUG] Interesting issue
To: Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list trilug@trilug.org
I'd much rather receive an RTFM response to a question rather
than silence
Subject: Re: [TriLUG] Interesting issue
To: Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list trilug@trilug.org
I'd much rather receive an RTFM response to a question rather
than silence.
IMHO,the crickets gives the user two possible answers:
1. The problem is too simple for anyone to bother answering
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, February 17, 2007 5:33 pm
Subject: Re: [TriLUG] Interesting issue
To: Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list trilug@trilug.org
I'd much rather receive an RTFM response to a question rather
than silence.
IMHO,the crickets gives the user two possible
IMHO,the crickets gives the user two possible answers:
1. The problem is too simple for anyone to bother answering.
2. The problem is too complex and no one knows the answer.
Don't take it so personally. A lot of times it just means you
asked the question at the wrong time... like when
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 03:30:26PM -0500, jonc wrote:
The user didn't do a lot of troubleshooting (at least that was relayed
in the message). Most folks aren't going to simply jump in and suggest
things when the user gives the appearance of being too clueless to
effect any of the
Truthfully, I can't see anything obvious on this. So here are some
general ideas of what might have led to this situation that I didn't
hear mentioned in your email:
1. Is this squirelmail something you installed or a standard package
on the system (by the way, what kind of system is
I'd much rather receive an RTFM response to a question rather than silence.
IMHO,the crickets gives the user two possible answers:
1. The problem is too simple for anyone to bother answering.
2. The problem is too complex and no one knows the answer.
But more importantly, it really says that
A few days ago, I passed on a message from a friend, asking about some
SquirrelMail issues. I thought that we had some gurus in the group,
even on that subject, but haven't seen anything in reply to that
message. Is it just impossible or can anyone offer him any
suggestions?
Thanks,
Brian
--
maybe theyre just too busy submitting resumes to google. ;)
Jason
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 02:20:29PM -0500, Brian
McCullough wrote:
A few days ago, I passed on a message from a friend, asking about some
SquirrelMail issues. I thought that we had some gurus in the group,
even on that
Brian McCullough wrote:
A few days ago, I passed on a message from a friend, asking about some
SquirrelMail issues. I thought that we had some gurus in the group,
even on that subject, but haven't seen anything in reply to that
message. Is it just impossible or can anyone offer him any
The user didn't do a lot of troubleshooting (at least that was relayed
in the message). Most folks aren't going to simply jump in and suggest
things when the user gives the appearance of being too clueless to
effect any of the suggestions... Unless the error is specific enough or
common enough to
12 matches
Mail list logo
