DaveH wrote:
One of my other cousins took offense, saying that
Sweet Jesus is blasphemous and is the same as
taking the Lord's name in vain. How do other
TTers feel about this???
It is not blasphemy, but it is taking the Lord's name in vain. The name
of God is Jesus (technically, Yeshua
On Sun, 01 Jun 2003 21:39:49
-0700 Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:DAVEH: May I assume your question is rhetorical,
and meant to
denigrate my beliefs, g?
assume whatever you must--MMM speaks for
itself
isn't there a Mormon we could ask to
come here and deal withour 1Cor 7 questions, or may we
assumethey are all as ignorant about it as you,
DaveH?
--
On Sun, 01 Jun 2003 21:38:35 -0700 Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2003
I agree--using the name of the Lord in that context is entirely unnecessary
and frivolous; therefore disrespectful and irreverent. He is an AWESOME
God, and is to be REVERED as HOLY. Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Miller
Sent:
I've preached with many of these guys before, but never have I seen an
altercation with the police quite like this one. Following are a few
quotes from a report concerning the arrest of five street preachers.
May 24th, 2003:
No sooner had they began preaching, than the police surrounded them,
David,
You have missed the point of my post. For some reason I am not surprised.
The topic is not the Trinity. I only raised that as an example, one that we
hashed out some time ago, and I will not be drawn into that trap again so
that you can avoid the other points I made.
The topic was
[6/2, DavidM:]
See the whole story at:
http://www.streetpreachersfellowship.com/indy.asp
actually, this is the whole [of one side of the] story--eh?
gary ottoson * http://poet235.com
The best thing to hit the internet in years -
[6/2, DavidM:]
See the whole story at:
http://www.streetpreachersfellowship.com/indy.asp
Gary wrote:
actually, this is the whole [of one side
of the] story--eh?
LOL. Yes, you are absolutely right. We will have to wait for the case
to come to court to hear the other side, eh?
Peace be with
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
David,
You have missed the point of my post.
DAVEH: Yeah.I think so.
For some reason I am not surprised.
The topic is not the Trinity.
DAVEH: Then why did you mention it if you didn't want me to respond to it.
I only raised that as an example,
9 matches
Mail list logo
