DAVEH: Then how does one explain that some Bibles contain errant headings IF God would not allow it? According to SB (today's radio broadcast), Hebrews is not the only book in question.
I just found out today there is a contorversy about the bible dictionary in the back of my bible. There may
DAVEH: Don't you mean to ask, "which translation is the most correct"???
KEVIN: Don't you mean to ask, "Yea, hath God said?" Gen 3:1Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
which translation is correct?DAVEH: Don't you mean to ask, "which translation is the most correct"???
G ~P
Where do you get the teaching that men are born spiritualy alive?
What exactly is inheriting a "physical state" ?
Why does that state have DEATH attached to it?Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
butthey die; for what reason?DAVEH: They physically die because of inheriting
I agree with you, it is helpful if a source is quoted.
Poor Ol Jo (thye AUTHOR) LOST 116 pages of the Book o Mormon
How can I ever Trust it again?Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Kevin. You are faster than a speeding bullet. Your testimony is more powerful than a locomotive.
Charles Perry Locke wrote: DaveH, what is the most perfect book ever written? DAVEH: THE BOOK OF LIFE as described in Rev 20:12. Do you disagree, Perry?
KEVIN:
Where can I get a copy? Does Deseret Book carry it?
What is the most perfect book on earth?
Is that book perfect?
By the way is your
DaveH,
I would guess so.
Regarding this statement:
Concerning this record the Prophet Joseph Smith said: 'I told the brethren
that the Book of Mormon was the most correct of any book on earth, and the
keystone of our religion, and a man would get nearer to God by abiding by
its precepts,
http://www.whig.com/292270384629817.php
Walker was arrested in January and charged with one count of aggravated criminal sexual abuse. The count alleges Walker of having sexual contact with a female under the age of 13 in Nauvoo in May 1998. The incident took place in a Mormon church,
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 17:21:51 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
VINCE The problem in Mormonism is that you open up again the Roman and
Greek idea of there being many gods, which I believe would be contrary to
Scripture and the cherished teaching of Scripture that there is only one
OK, no problem.:)
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 20:34:03 -0800 Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DAVEH: Ooops.I'm sorry, Vincent. I was in a hurry to leave for
work this morning and thought I remembered you responding to my original
post on this. Instead, it was Bill who made the
Vince,
I would like to say a few words on this, but do it in the context of what
Dave H. is wondering about in relation to infants and sin and dying, so if
you're interested, watch for a post to Dave H.
Bill Taylor
Eastern Colorado (where we're a mile high and still below zero today)
-
Do you guys mind if I butt in? I do not believe
infants can sin either, not if by "sinning" we mean that God holds them
accountable for their actions. Young children may do things that are contrary to
God's law; in that sense,some may say that they are sinning. But Paul says
where there is
Oh, OK. That sounds like it'll be interesting.
vincent j. fulton
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:22:52 -0700 Wm. Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Vince,
I would like to say a few words on this, but do it in the context of
what
Dave H. is wondering about in relation to infants and sin and
SorryI just cut pasted it as is.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 17:21:51 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>writes:VINCE The problem in Mormonism is that you open up again the Roman andGreek idea of there being many gods, which I believe would be contrary toScripture and the
Ignorance is bliss?
So if he had continued in that state he would go to heaven?"Wm. Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you guys mind if I butt in? I do not believe infants can sin either, not if by "sinning" we mean that God holds them accountable for their actions. Young children may do
Question: How can a child be born spiritually alive
and at the same time be born an heir of Adam, with his sin or fallen nature? I
was taught since Sunday School that Adam's sin brought spiritual death to not
only himself but all of his descendants.
A Possible Answer (and Vince, this is to
Ignorance of the law has never been an excuse.
We were all born children of wrath - by nature when we were babies.
(Ephesians 2:3)
Paul was alive once in Adam before the fall but he was never alive in his
lifetime
until he received Christ - he was born and lived most of his life under the
Kevin,
I think people go to hell for one reason: They
trample under foot the Lord who redeemed them. This is the blasphemy of the
Spirit, of which Jesus speaks.
And so in that sense: yes, I think when little
children die they go to be with Jesus, they go to heaven. Why? because they have
Yes, Judy. That is one way of looking at this.
There may be others. One of those others may even be right. :)
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 11:00
AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Last words on Jesus
From: "Wm. Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question: How can a child be born spiritually alive
and at the same time be born an heir of Adam, with his sin or fallen nature? I
was taught since Sunday School that Adam's sin brought spiritual death to not
only himself but all of his descendants.
JT:
Kevin wrote:
Just saying he was a devil.
You are side-stepping the issue. I agree that Judas was a devil. That
is the point. If Judas was a devil, why didn't Jesus separate from him?
That seems to me to contradict your separatist doctrine. Instead, Jesus
anointed him to preach and heal the
Wait a minute - are you claiming that Jesus anointed Satan to
cast out Satan?
I don't think that could be right. Jesus said he cast out satan with the
finger of God.
Of course he knew before it happened who it would be but it had
to have been a progression and Satan didn't enter into him until
Judy, it's not that I'm opposed to or even unaware
of the format of this forum. I know it ishere so that people can have some
give and take. But Judy, I'm not able to do that with you. It's not because I'm
not willing to give; it's because you're not willing to give. I'll quickly
answer
By the way there are still a bunch of devils preaching today.David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin wrote: Just saying he was a devil.You are side-stepping the issue. I agree that Judas was a devil. Thatis the point. If Judas was a devil, why didn't Jesus separate from him?That seems to me to
Ok.:)
vjf
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 09:21:47 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry I just cut pasted it as is.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 17:21:51 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan
writes:
VINCE The problem in Mormonism is that you open up again the Roman and
Hey Bill:
I think you may be laboring under an
illusion. Not all of us think that it took the go'el. Some of us
are so uneducated that we have never heard of go'el. We figure it took
the blood shed on the cross, not the blood in our veins.
Hope this does not offend you, but
Ez 44:23 And they shall teach my people the difference between the holy and profane, and cause them to discern between the unclean and the clean.
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/calthomas/ct20030805.shtmlCal Thomas says: "The film is an intense two hours. It uses unknown actors, which keeps
Kevin wrote:
Since you do not hold to separatist view
then it is no problem
But since you do hold to the separatist view, it is a problem for you.
Why don't you abandon that false doctrine in the light of Scripture, or
why don't you at least modify your view to conform to Scripture?
Peace be
Hey Terry, I hope for your sake it is an illusion,
because when I look around, you're not in it. :) Just kidding, just
kidding.
No really, go'el is a Hebrew transliteration. It
means kinsmen redeemer. Why don't you go back to yesterday's posts and see where
I explained this term, along
Kevin wrote:
Not interested in UNITY with error.
I'm not interested in unity with error either. More importantly, Jesus
was not interested in unity with error. Yet, he did not separate from
Judas. Would you have treated Judas like Jesus did? If not, then
something is wrong with your
I understood what you said about a kinsman
reedemer in the old testament. I just don't agree that it has to be that
waywith Christ.
Terry
- Original Message -
From:
Wm.
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 8:48
Thanks David. I appreciate the encouraging words. I
would be thrilled to share more about the atonement and redemption. It seems to
me the place to start is with the OT terms kipur, pedah, and
go'el. I wrote on these yesterday and will post it again here. I you've
already read it, let me
From: "Wm. Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Judy, it's not that I'm opposed to or even unaware
of the format of this forum. I know it ishere so that people can have some
give and take. But Judy, I'm not able to do that with you. It's not because I'm
not willing to give; it's because you're not
DavidM:
You must not have read the post I sent explaining how following
the moon alone would put the calender off over a period of time
and passover would eventually wind up in the fall - hence Babylonian
adjustments. It's not me who is complicating things. The expert
Mel Gibson used is a Jesuit
Hi Terry:
If it were that way with Christ we would see it in scripture by two
or more witnesses. The kinsman redeemer concept is a beautiful one for Ruth and
Boaz who were God's OT covenant people after the flesh. We as gentiles
become God's covenant people in Christ after the Spirit - at
Where did you find the information about the women Kevin?
I've read that Monica Belluci who played Mary is Jewish and
the daughter of holocaust survivors... Judy
From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ez 44:23 And they shall teach my people the difference between the
holy and profane, and
35 matches
Mail list logo
