I
didn't realize this interpretation removed any threat. Is that why I interpret
the passage this way?If you'd be so kind, which is the correct contextual
interpretation and why?
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Wm.
I may have unfairly jumped to a conclusion
concerningyour concept, Slade, thus lumping you into a group in which you
do not fit. If this isso, please forgive me. When you wrote, "see the
miracles of Yeshua," I was thinking Yeshua would need to be visibly present to
be seen working the
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 5:39
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: It's Open Season on
Christians Again
For free and unrestricted use with attribution.
Its Open Season
on Christians Again
Bigotry is Bad! (Unless of Course,
Thanks Chris, tell us though: What does Taylor have
to do with the Canucks. Taylor is from the high plains of eastern
Colorado.He once worked one very cold winter in the taconite mines of
Northern Minnesota, replacing burned out bricks in very hot furnaces and wind
ducts, and sohe knew a
In a message dated 7/23/2004 2:17:41 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please pay close attention to the last sentence of Marcus 3:22-30. Yeshua tells us what blasphemy against the Spirit of the Holy One is. Now my question... Is this kind of sin that can be committed only by
\o/ !HALALU
Yah! \o/
Greetings in the Matchless
Name of YahShua
!
Taylor is held in high regard by the
Canucks, and would seem to be the resident trinitarian scholar as well, so I
thought to include you. Thought the story might be of interest or a note
of amusement to you.
My
"Truly I say to you, all sins
shall be forgiven the sons of men, and whatever blasphemies they utter;but
whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty
of an eternal sin" (because they were
saying, 'He has an unclean spirit.')
Hi John, and Slade. One can
Not offended in the least, Chris, just a bit slow.
Thanks for the clarification -- it makes great sense now. The Trinitarian
doctrine of God does not, as I see it, exclude from the Faith once
delivered people as yourself who do not ascribe to it, not as long as you are
not denying the full
* G
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 06:39:09 -0600 "Wm. Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..the limited [*actually skewed] view of
Ryrie:..
I enjoyed reading this application of Kruger thought. I enjoyed it because I agreed with it's conclusions. The parenthetical remark concerning JudyT caused some concern, however.
John
In a message dated 7/23/2004 8:23:13 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not offended
Okay, okay, you are right, it was unnecessary and I
shouldn't have done it. I guess what comes around doesn't have to go around. I
will try to be better.
bill
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 6:48 PM
In a message dated 7/23/2004 6:06:27 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Okay, okay, you are right, it was unnecessary and I shouldn't have done it. I guess what comes around doesn't have to go around. I will try to be better.
bill
You're a good man, Bill Taylor.
By the way,
Matt 12
28But if I drive out demons by the Spirit
of God, then the kingdom of God has come upon you.
||
32Anyone who speaks a word against the Son
of Man will be forgiven, but anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will not
be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.
the
13 matches
Mail list logo
