recent
posts that cause you to think that he is making such a separation
-- or that he is even discussing the use of these two concepts
(read:words)? It appears to me that you are just looking for
something to argue about.
From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.com
Point
Lance where did you dredge up something like
this?
Such exquisite deception -some ppl just have too
much time on their hands...
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:20:15 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- Original Message -
From:
Sent: November 29, 2005 11:15
Subject:
readers
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:39:36 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Lance where did you dredge up something like
this?
Such exquisite deception -some ppl just have
too much time on their hands...
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:20:15 -0500 "Lance Muir&qu
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 07:03:47 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 23:26:04 -0800 Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
DAVEH: Thanx for your advice on this, DavidM...especially
considering your time constraints.
Not that I want to open another
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 07:12:37 -0800 Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How would you be able to discern truth DaveH when you
are already deceived by the religion you were
either born into or have chosen to follow?
DAVEH: It seems pretty obvious to me that at
least one of the
se in point-at least in terms of your hyperbole)
Yet are you able to discern correctly on other matters. What a thing to say to
DaveH! IMO dearest Dave has a pretty good handle on TT in the 'deception
department'..
From: Judy Taylor
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 07:12:37 -0800 Dave Han
Enough of them. jt
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:22:06 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
all of them,
jt? please address this question, too,as you describe 'the record'
for us
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:47:59 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Calvin's acts as the spiritual
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 19:39:58 -0500 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dean
wrote: -No I did not read the entire work-but as you know
we can know a tree by its fruit-when A Saints plan and carries
out a gruesome death of another Christian and later shows no
remorse they have
Calvin forced the citizens of Geneva to
attend church services under a heavy threat of punishment. Since Calvinism falsely teaches that God forces the elect to believe, it
is no wonder that Calvin thought he could also force the citizens of Geneva to
all become the elect. Not becoming one of
Oh Lance - and what is that?
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 07:12:28 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd be more inclined to ask that we attend to the part played by Christians in generating
such a celebration of one's heritage. Yes, dearest detractors, I do comprehend
that it was
What in the world is "theological history?" Is it
religious history revised every seven years
or so as is secular history? How about fair
treatment for Servetus? He may have been a
deceived astrologer but he was not a
murderer.
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 05:47:15 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL
Ppl in denial Iz have got to find somebody or group to
blame - it's like a scapegoat mentality.
However, the real culprit - SIN - is never ever
mentioned.
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 07:36:58 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
That is such blatant,
predictable politically
be sinning in their speech yet not know it?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: November 28, 2005 08:42
Subject: Re: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] Happy
Kwanza?
Ppl in denial I
DAVEH: So where's the truth? Judy posted a pretty
compelling argument that was diametrically opposed to DavidM's
comments. Which is correct?
All you have to do, Dave, is read more history from both sides. What
you find is that many people spin the facts however they want to spin
it. The
There is more history to this than you are considering. If you want a
more objective historian's viewpoint who still sides against Calvin,
consider Schaff's History of the Christian Church. You can read his
treatment at http://www.ccel.org/s/schaff/history/8_ch16.htm
I did go to and read
David, I have Will Durant's book on the Reformation and
some other historical
type works that say much the same as what Dean is
writing. Why do you call
these ppl "enemies of Calvin?" I certainly would
not seek something written by
a "Calvinist" for an objective view and I don't believe
you
Cain wasn't an Israelite
either; he was just a man with a propensity toward sin and no heart for
God
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 20:46:33 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DaveH ain't
Cain, Bro--neither is he an Israelite
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 19:31:17 -0800
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 08:14:12 -0800 Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But, it seemed good to me to deflect this discussion from increasing
threats toward DH -- and
I still think that the best choice. DAVEH: I
appreciate you trying to moderate the pressure of the situation,
Bishop.
somewhere?
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 15:15:41 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
For some reason he loves to get in the middle of
these kinds of things
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
Christine and, cd. (Linda strikes me as a Proverbs 31 kinda
woman. She appears as a friend to the friendless and a raconteur. When she
goes beyond one line she is often a delight to read.)
From: Judy Taylor
You are Bill and not Lance who made the
"accus
Discourse) are: 'You just don't understand' and, 'That's not what I meant'.n
bsp;
From: Judy Taylor
Here we go again - with you
illustrating my point made below as well. All five of this mornings
linesconsistare solely
of
your
Why not allow DavidM's wife to speak for herself?
You have introduced gossip and heresy here.
Were you invited to bepresent for the birth of their children?
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 06:50:29 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
askDavidMs
(brainwashed?) wife about this subject, Bro--she
othing else, practice
being a little more subtle and you will come across as being more
intellectually urbane. :-)
Peace be with you.David Miller.
From: Judy Taylor
Here we go again - with you illustrating my point
made below as well. All five of this mornings lines
Judy's answer is - In the light of God's Word ...
No there will never be "universal reconciliation" ... ever
The Geneva convention decries a lot of things but has
no power to stop them iethe rapes in Uganda
Sin is and will be a problemso long as men love
darkness more than light - they judge
Judy's question:
Why do some ppl find it so hard to accept what they can
not change? God's Word has been settled in heaven
It is what it is. He does not change and neither
does His Word. Yet so many appear to believe they could do it
better leaving themselves open to massive
deception.
Yes ... Hopelessness in the false premise
Rejoicing in the real
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 08:39:04 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hopelessness; it
arises from zero and falseEschatological
perspective
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:27:17 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes
JD why do you so consistently keep stirring the pot
even after an issue has been resolved?
Izzy dealt with the issue long ago
Dean put forth his suggestion
The Moderator has spoken
It is now a non-issue, finito - finished -
resolved
You are wasting mental energy
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:49:55
with the lion: universal reconciliation eschatologically, its
a promiseof God's
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:46:53 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Yes ... Hopelessness
||
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
Of course you are ... and what's more he is better than
Moses. Jesus said John the Baptist (not Moses) was the greatest under the
Old Covenant and the leastin the Kingdom are greater than he which would
include DavidM's wife Caroline. I don't
understand your continual tanget about dualism
that I believe the one offering is not complete. Per
this verse, it is our sanctification which is not yet complete. But I
don't expect you to understand that either. Bill
From: Kevin Deegan
The subject of the sentence 10:14 is the
ONE OFFERING so Bi
bother reading your
second paragraph.
jd-Original Message-----From: Judy Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 01:32:42
-0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor
You are wrong Bill.
Cd: 'Calvin's beliefs are of Satan-He was an evil man' says Dean
Moore
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:24:02 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Obviously spoken by someone who has never read the man.
Not one who has ever read 'The Insitute' would ever say such
as this!
Borrow
Then childishness has taken a lot of ppl to heaven and
blessed generations for more than 400yrs.
It wasn't a single man JD, it was 46 different teams
that were sanctified or set apart and worked
prayerfully together - so why such vehement opposition
from your corner?
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005
Just in case you care JD
These six things the Lord hates, yes seven are an
abomination to Him:
1. A proud look
2. A lying tongue
3. Hands that shed innocent blood
4. A heart that devises wicked plans
5. Feet that are swift in running to evil
6. A false witness who speaks lies
7. One who
What? Did Paul burn no telling how many men and
37 women at the stake for what in his opinion
was heresy?
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:17:55 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul did much the same thing. -Original
Message-From: Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
7. One who sows discord among brethren
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:31:30 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Her posted apology was not in existence when you and I wrote our
individual comments.The
conversation was out of place, but DH is certainly no more at fault than Linda. He went no
all candor so would mine, Kevin's, Dean's, John's, and Linda's). The
'unnamed' regularly display a model of 'engagement' that we all might
aspire to.
From: Judy Taylor
Cd: 'Calvin's beliefs are of Satan-He was an evil man' says Dean
Moore
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 1
owever, this doesn't mean you don't do it. It just means that
you don't know you're doing it, IMO.
From: Judy Taylor
What "invective" filled language
Lance?
Examples please
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:36:37 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7. One who sows discord among brethren
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:19:32 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think that Linda did not take the same level of offense to this
as you. Unlike Perry -- I do not understand your
outrage. Linda is not your wife. I see this only as an
No JD, what you are ignoring is the Word of the Lord -
just a gentle reminder.
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:28:03 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm ignoring you, can't you tell? jd
From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7. One who sows discord among brethren
On Fri, 25 Nov
Amazing how the devil jumps in
and shuts it down just when it starts getting good isn't
it??
Thank you for being a friend,
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.o
Uh oh! JD has circumvented Wikipedia now and has
become smarter than their experts who say .
"The only Bible which can legitimately be called a "revision" is the New King James Version,
since it is based on the same Greek textsthe Textus Receptus."
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 23:24:41 -0500
I don't believe there are any Kevin - Looks like we are
stuck with Bill and his Gk revelation alone Now tell me
Is it "interpretation, translation, or
commentary?" The more JD talks the more confusing it allbecomes. I
will
have to stop reading him soon
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 21:07:45
ist.But go ahead
and disagree with that.You prove nothing by so
doing.jd
Are you aware JD that
"educational accomplishments" which are so exalted by the world can become
an
idol in the Church. We
are all at the mercy of a God who is able to turn the lights on
JD you wrote:
"Its not even close. Youaskd for examples when, in fact, you are
asking us to convince you that we are right.
Impossible. And you have taken your cue from Terry quite well. Now we
can expect tohear -- over and over
again -that Bill's
conversation is so muchabove the rest of
Exactly ...
Just this morning I was thinking about how things have
changed andare completely reversed from what
they once were. I was
reading where Paul in Thessalonica told the ppl he "thanked God without
ceasing
because when ye received the word of God which ye heard of us, ye received
l with such because it would force you to acknowledge more
than one definition for "judging" and we can't have that, because we are so
darn busy sending the other side to hell for "judging" while we do the very
same thing.
Anyway -- have a happy
This is what Lance calls 'concise?'
Passing judgment that is void of understanding -
critical spirits masquerading as some
kind ofbent wisdom?
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 07:37:42 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
myth (the options
are false; thewriter'selimination ofdifficultyis
1:37 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
'concis[ion]..' void of [jt's] understanding..:
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:57:32 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
This is what Lance calls 'concise?'
Passing judgment that is void of understanding -
critical spirits masquerading as some
k
VENGENACE IS MINE, I WILL REPAY SAYS THE LORD
(Romans 12:19)
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:26:10 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Good comments, below. I havelong believed, i.e. Ro 1:18-29, that the most damaging of all
realities is the one tied to this statement by God, "You are on your
corrector/revisor
The subject of the sentence 10:14 is the ONE OFFERING
so Bill is saying it is "Not yet Complete"Judy Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't speculate on all that Bill because in
my unders
10:31:25 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Izzy's options are scriptural
||
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
and has putyou and Kev in charge Preach it ,
baby -- but LOOK no one is listening.
Do you realize, Judy Taylor, that 12:18-19 is actually a statement
AGAINST the ankst of personal retaliation?
" If possible, as far as it depends ON YOU, be at peace with
all men.
.
From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.com
Your drift is incomprehensible JD and there is no "death blow" because FYI
Hebrews 10:14 does not refer to any race ... Oh what
a tangled web we weave...
Vs.14 here relates to Hebrews 10:9,10 ie: "Then He (Jesus) said
So tell me Mr. myth man - what do I think? You
seem to think you know better than me.
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:09:53 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
myth (it's not
what you think)
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:05:16 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Bill's statement is way
t,Paul is telling us exactly the opposite !!
Turkey or crow, today?
Which will it be , Miss Judy?
:-)From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.com
I understand the setting JD and just because
you don't like it why lie about noone
listening; you are not EVERYONE
God's righteous
outthis? I remain
confused. -Original Message-From:
Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu,
24 Nov 2005 11:05:16 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
corrector/revisor
I know what you are commenting on JD;
However
OTECTED]
writes:
RACE. What is that
about?how do you
get a race outthis? I remain
confused. -Original Message-----From:
Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent:
Thu,
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 23:07:01 -0500 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't think they were misled by the passage. I think they
perceived that you do not perceive the completed aspect of sanctification, and
you were trying to use your Greek exegesis skills to make this
'perfected'?
Dean Moore cd_moore@earthlink.net
wrote:
cd: see the Bottom of
page.
-
Original Message -
From: Judy Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:20:18 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When you see the word "perfected,"as used in Heb 10:14, what does that mean to you. How
are we to understandthat we "have been perfected for ever by
Christ?"Secondly, with this verse in mind, how have we
been
Bill, you and your Gk Dictionary cohorts are putting
yourselves into a very definite doctrinalcorner here.
How do you know God is not using the word sanctified to
mean "set apart and/or consecrated" as an
"unbelieving" wife would be by nature?
The more you write the more outlandish and
Amen! God says "Woe unto those who call evil
good"
We are to have no fellowship with the unfruitful works
of darkness but rather reprove them; for it is a shame even to speak of those
things which are done of them in secret. But all things that are reproved
are made manifest by the light;
He chased the thieves and mercenary out of the temple
with a whip Lance.
Are you now using Jesus as your example rather than
SNL?
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 05:30:48 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes: Thanks David. As I suspected, no illustrations.
From: "David Miller" [EMAIL
See Subject line..above
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 06:48:40 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Who are the 'non-mud slingers' on TT-Read them as a model
Bill Taylor, David Christine Miller, Dave
Hansen, "G'. IMO, of course. Even such as these have, on occasion, fallen prey
to
Selected: "if you live in a glass
house...well you know."
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 07:06:29 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bill, David Christine Miller, 'G', Dave
Hansen (with occasional and understandable expressions of
impatience)
From:
This is like a dog chasing it's tail and
doing it in Greek compounds the problem.
What difference is there betweena
mistake and an error?
Mistake: To err in opinion or
judgment; An error in opinion or judgment, a
misconcption
2. A slip; a fault; an error. There
is a mistake in the
es:
Fair enough. Do you accept the present passive
thrust of this verb? My impression is that you do not.
Bill
From: Judy Taylor
Are you living in some kind of delusion
Bill?
My understanding of that text remains the same as
it was, so please let's deal
by someone other than the subject) and not yet complete?
Bill
From: Judy Taylor
I have no idea what you are talking about
Bill. However I do understand Hebrews 10:14
and the word "sanctified" in this instance means
"set apart" in the same way that a
;Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Mistakes" is the word Dean and I agreed to
discuss, Judy. That is what I point out below. Why escalate the rhetoric with
loaded words like "error," when that is not necessary? How is that helpful?
Bill
From:
Jud
om: Taylor
"Mistakes" is the word
Dean and I agreed to discuss, Judy. That is what I point out below.
Why escalate the
rhetoric with loaded words like "error," when that is not necessary? How is
that helpful? Bill
From: Judy Taylor
Taylor
"Mistakes" is the word Dean and I agreed to
discuss, Judy. That is what I point out below. Why escalate the rhetoric
with loaded words like "error," when that is not necessary? How is that
helpful?
Bill
So Bill are youdiscouraged by negative comments
from the gallery? Do you accept Lance's
evaluations at face value? Have you decided in
the light of these comments notto explain how
mistake and error mean two different things (to you)?
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:15:59 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL
of another to the exclusion
of any other theme !!! I Cor
8:1ff really has the same theme in mind, as well. How in world did
you miss this ??
Jd
-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor
jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSen
an that he
did not answer clearly and specifically.
JdFrom: Judy Taylor
jandgtaylor1@juno.com
So Bill are youdiscouraged by negative comments
from the gallery? Do you accept Lance's
evaluations at face value? Have you decided in
the light of these comments notto e
writes:
He did give such an explanation.Because you disagreed with his statement does not mean that he
did not answer clearly and specifically. JdFrom: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.com
So Bill are youdiscouraged by negative
comments from the
14:4. You need to practice what you preach.
JdFrom: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JD why do you hang everything on meats which is what
is under dispute in Romans 14.
In other places believers are told not to even eat
with a brother given over to certain sins such as
f
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:42:23 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, Ro 1: 18-25 is a
statement ofcircumstances failed and , as such, find the sinner
given over to his own creation.
Romans 1 speaks of what happens to people who hold
the truth in unrighteousness. That
Right On!! How hard is
that?
I note that being perfected by the Blood of
Jesus requires repentance from 'dead works'
Thanks Izzy
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:36:32 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
We
are perfected through the Blood of Jesus, which washes away our sins and
AMEN!!! :)
\0/
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:29:31 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Sanctified
means set apart for holy use. When I was saved I was set apart for
holy usethen, now and forever. I can either allow that to continue, or
I can interfere by choosing to sin
up their Private Interpretation of the "ONE
OFFERING as an ON GOING EVENT"
Theology!Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have no idea what you are talking about
Bill. However I do understand Hebrews 10:14 and the word "sanctified" in this insta
hose who do not know that they are living in sin?
(i.e., "I came to save the sinners, not the
righteous")Judy Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:42:23 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, Ro 1: 18-25 is a
st
Neither will heacknowledge that Jesus
chased thieves out of the temple yet he castigates DavidM
for chasing a thief at the University of
Florida
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:12:37 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Lance still can't SEE that Theft is a SINLance Muir
"The point of the book of
Romans is two-fold (at least
through chapter 8)
--we are sinners
andstill dealing with sin issues
AND God in Christ saves us
anyway.If
this is so thenHe needs to apologize to Sodom and
Gomorrah
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:18:46 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wri
is the ONE OFFERING so
Bill is saying it is "Not yet Complete"Judy Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't speculate on all that Bill because in my
understanding the active part of sanctificationrequires
the cooperation of the one being sanctified; the
ention. Do you agree that this participle in
Heb 10.14 reflect asanctification which is passive (i.e., the action
is being performed by someone other than the subject) and not yet
complete? Bill
From: Judy
Taylor
I have no idea what you are talking
theissue being
discussed. Judging the servant of another is. The
issues surrounding the eating of meats and observing holy days gave Paul the
circustance to discussion the principle described in 14:4. You
need to practice what you preach.
Jd-----Original Message
writes:
The subject of the sentence 10:14 is the ONE OFFERING
so Bill is saying it is "Not yet Complete"Judy Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't speculate on all that Bill because in
my understan
what grounds do you say the baby
believers at Corinth were "obviously" saved. Do you know
that they held fast firm to the end or is it your own peculiar doctrine that
tells you that they made it?"
If we say that we are having no sin we deceive
It's discussed at the website below as occult and there
is a download for it there.
I have it but have not read it yet, a pastor I receive
Newsletters from was talking about it
and so I was curious. Seems like it addresses the
evil in the world, angelic watchers etc.
and a quote from it is
Title: Evaluating the New International Version
Interesting answer Lance,
So what are you saying? Should God's Word be
dumbed down to accommodate pagan animistic cultures?
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 06:09:31 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A friend, John Wilson, worked with the Yali
Could it be that California
rarified air? You need to own your own error JD
and do the right thing by taking responsibility. You wrote:
You
continually speak of the NASV
as a book that removes the words of Christ --
something that is untrue. Is my only choice to call you a
liar because
about snow, bread, etc. Get
him a Little Golden Book and show and tell
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 06:52:40 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No Judy, I am not saying (meaning) that! Anyone
care to explain my MEANING to Judy?
From: Judy Taylor
Interesting an
Now this is "comedy" time - for sure. JD
reflecting a combination of exegesis, exposition, and theological
instinct?
You have just categorized the things you hold most dear
and JD reflects them when he will not even tell the truth on TT?
For your sake Lance I pray there will come a time
Hmmm - Just as I thought, the Holy Spirit
has been fired and men have taken over; men who exalt Greek present passive
verbs..
Are we in the last days with apostasy and
falling away or what?? judyt
Is there someone here who speaks Judy's language that
could maybe explain to her the meaning
So what has all this got to do with the ministry of the
Holy Spirit. God can save by few or by many and what is too hard for
Him?
Believe it or not the Holy Spirit is bilingual
also.
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 08:25:18 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes Virginia, there really are
NO HE HASN'T DONE ANYTHING OF THE
KIND. HE IS CONFRONTING YOU WITH YOUR OWN WORDS - be honest jd, own
up.
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:56:23 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is exactly why I do not accept anything that Kevin says as
authoritative. When you rip a person's
what I am
reading am I safe in assuming that the Authorized Version has been exonerated
on this issue anyway David?
Peace be with you.David
Miller.
From: Judy Taylor
Hmmm - Just as I thought, the Holy
Spirit has been fired and men have taken over; men w
OK Kevin God has spoken ...
so now forever hold your peace.
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 20:13:20 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kevin asks Shouldn't it be translated "BEING
MADE PERFECT"?
No.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin Deegan
You might be all for discussion JD but it is a
waste time trying to dialogue with ppl who have a problem withtruth
Probably better use of one's time
would be to start a jail ministry ...
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 22:14:11 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You know what, deegan
-- I
1001 - 1100 of 4567 matches
Mail list logo
