We have been watching the news lately, plus getting some stuff by
e-mail, and it seems that the world we once knew is no longer to be found.
It is bad enough when all the big merchants, such as Wal Mart, Sears,
Target and home depot stop advertising Christmas sales and start
advertising
Lance Muir wrote:
Allow me to raise the level of this
conversationO yaa!
ROFL
Terry
Just more speculation/ human logic.
==
Dave Hansen wrote:
YES I'd like for you to post the
'newer'
material
DAVEH: I'm not fond of borrowing material from another forum to post
in its entirety, but I find Court Watch's
Kevin Deegan wrote:
temple stone!
I had kinda pictured God in my mind as having a
little different hair do. Are you certain this is Him?
Terry
the temptations that Eve failed to
avoid?
Here's something to ponder: What effect would monkeys, horses or
whatever animals inhabiting the Garden of Eden eating the forbidden
fruit have had IFF AE hadn't?
Terry Clifton wrote:
This seems so obvious that it should be hard to miss
your belief about it though, Terry.
Terry Clifton wrote:
God's desire was for them to remain pure and innocent, just as
would be
the desire of any father for his children. The tree was there to
give
them a choice. We always have a choice to make. If eating the fruit
of that tree
I think you might have missed something, Blaine. There is no reason to
think that Judy would not have been here if there had been no fall.
The command to "Be fruitful and multiply" came prior to the fall. See
Genesis 1:28.
Terry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Blainerb: You seem to be
.
Terry
===
Dave Hansen wrote:
monkeys and horses
do not have a soul.
DAVEH: ??? Aren't you speculating when you make that claim, Terry?
What Biblical evidence supports that theory?
Terry Clifton wrote:
I won't
Please do not try to deceive us, IZ. Shabby! Just shabby!! We know
rental kids when we see them. Probably from rentakid.com or Family for
a day.org. I've seen that dog somewhere before too. Think it was a
"Front line" ad.
Terry
ShieldsFamily wrote:
PS I forgot
to
I wasn't there Blaine. If you don't like it, complain to God. He
ordered it, not me. I do, however, think it was a great idea. One of
the easiest commands to keep. ;-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you saying Adam and Eve were capable of having sex prior to
the Fall?? What
it.
Judy wrote:
I think they did nto have to transgress and if they had not they
would have saved themselves and the rest of
humanity all of the heartache,
suffering,
and misery that has been the human lot since then. Why would the
Lord
want that for them/us?
Terry Clifton
Some day we will know, as we are known.
Lance Muir wrote:
Does anyone always and only have an
accurate and exhaustive understanding of the entire Biblical corpus?
Are we promised any
perspective, Terry.I assume
you believe that God did not want AE to sin though, even though he
knew they would. Is that correct?
Terry Clifton wrote:
Just the facts, Dave. Fact one: Adam and Eve did sin.
Fact two: God hates sin.
Fact three: Getting people to sin is the top
Lance Muir wrote:
Anyone going to see it? What think
ye all of C. S. Lewis?
The only one I've read is "The Screwtape Letters". I enjoyed it.
Terry
God's desire was for them to remain pure and innocent, just as would be
the desire of any father for his children. The tree was there to give
them a choice. We always have a choice to make. If eating the fruit
of that tree gave you the ability to know good from evil, what else
would you call
Just the facts, Dave. Fact one: Adam and Eve did sin.
Fact two: God hates sin.
Fact three: Getting people to sin is the top priority of Satan.
It's over. We know who to blame. Nothing to discuss.
Dave Hansen wrote:
No.Actually, I have never heard this question discussed
DAVEH:
How about someone explaining Exodus 4:24?
Terry
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you
ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL
Lance Muir wrote:
I shall venture an answer and, would
like to hear from all on this. JESUS IS THE STANDARD/PLUMBLINE. To the
extent that HE is misrepresented via anything then, to that extent what
is said as truth is less than the truth.
://www.scripturessay.com/q279b.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 7:19 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] Exodus
How about someone explaining Exodus 4:24?
Terry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 5:49 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exodus
I appreciate the link, Iz, but this guy is so far out in left field that
he is not even
illustration here of what God expects of all
who lead God's people today. We must first be obedient to God, then we
can lead others.
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 17:48:34 -0600 Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I appreciate the link, Iz, but this guy is so far out in left
field
that
he
. iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Monday, December
05, 2005
7:22 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Exodus
What in the world would lead
you to think that Moses
was bedridden, or even slightly
any other explanations, too. What do you think Terry? iz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 5:49 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exodus
I appreciate the link, Iz, bu
Thanks Dave. Makes more sense than some of the other comments.
Terry
Dave Hansen wrote:
DAVEH: FWIW..http://scriptures.lds.org/jst/ex42427
Terry Clifton wrote:
How about someone explaining Exodus 4:24?
Terry
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt
I wonder why it didn't catch on?
===
Kevin Deegan wrote:
Thoytom
Asse Coria Tushrump codsheadirustie,
MungrellimWhereo whish whap ragge dicete tottrie,
Mangelusquem verminets nipsem barelybittimsore,
Culliandolt travellerebumque,
WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD ANYONE WHO TRULY KNOWS THE lORD ONLY WORSHIP HIM
ONE DAY A WEEK? We are free to worship any day, any place, any time.
Live it up!
Kevin Deegan wrote:
The gift is Jesus Christ NOT Sturday!
I believe the SDA have replaced Jesus with the SATURDAY Sabbath
only
In
Yes. I know many, including myself. I am surprised that you do not.
ShieldsFamily wrote:
I dont know
anyone who does that,
Terry. Do you? iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Sunday, December
04, 2005
minute
of every
day? And I dont know anyone who lives it up any more than
I do. (Which often gets me into trouble on TT!) J iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Sunday, December
04, 2005
1:23 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
I thought that I had made that clear in prior posts
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Do you
only worship
the Lord on Sunday? iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Sunday, December
04, 2005
3:23 PM
To: TruthTalk
]] On
Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Sunday, December
04, 2005
9:28 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE:
[TruthTalk] Emailing:
sda.htm
Same here.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Sunday, December
04, 2005
7:39 PM
Lance Muir wrote:
WHO? Judy, Linda, Christine, David,
Dave, Lance, John, Bill, Kevin, Dean (whoops! not any more),
Dave..
WHAT? The matter under discussion.
Tell us more about the bridge. Modern or covered? Free or toll? Is
it as blue as your car, or one of
Lance Muir wrote:
Sorry about the bird (I meant to
name the Dodo). When one is untentionally funny Judy, people smileA
LOT!!
We have a dodo farm near us.
What in the flab is a pastor image?
==
Kevin Deegan wrote:
That was my point here is the guy who preaches against the tough
guy image to Dean.
Besides where how does the "PASTOR" image fit into this?
Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming that there will be an earth five hundred years from now would
appear to be quite a stretch. Maybe on Kolub??
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..and
500 years from now, John Calvin'sincreasingly interesting influenceon
globalfellowship with the Christ who partook of our human
Calvin would have made a good muslim.
Judy Taylor wrote:
No he didn't, deceived ppl never know they
are deceived. Calvin was drinking from a poisoned stream, his mentor
was Augustine rather than Christ. I don't
agree that he will receive a "well done thou good and faithful
Three reasons.
1. The signs of the times.
2. We have just about used it up.
3. With the population doubling every few years, we will run out of
room and food.
Lance Muir wrote:
Terry:
Why?
-
Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To:
TruthTalk
Dream on.
Lance Muir wrote:
1. No different than the 'signs' of
any other times.
2. No using up goin' on 'round here
3. Ever heard of WAR?
-
Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent:
December 02
al Message -
From:
Terry
Clifton
To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent:
December 02, 2005 08:44
Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Assuming 500 more years..
Three reasons.
1. The signs of the times.
2. We have just about used it up.
3. With the population doubling
Oh yeah? I suppose you don't think the end will come on September 6,
2006 then in spite of all the evidence! Next thing I know, you be
wanting to know "what evidence", as if you weren't up to date on red
heifers. Really Lance, how blind can you be?
:)
Lance Muir wrote:
IMO
there are NO
, after we reach that point, the world's
populations will actually begin to decrease.
-Original Message-
From: Terry Clifton wabbits1234@earthlink.net
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 13:12:41 -0600
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Assuming 500 more years
I can clear that up in a hot minute. There is God, the Father, and
there is God, the Son, and there is God the Holy Spirit. Three
persons, one mind, one goal.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy -- my point is this: if you reject the notion
thatJesus Christ and God are the same, then you
We tortured a prophet until he revealed all he knew.
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Oh, Sept 6
sounds great to me! Where did
you hear that, Terry? iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Friday, December
02, 2005
4:31 PM
Here is the absolute truth. Calvin was a sinner, just like you , just
like me. God has all the facts and has treated him justly. It is not
something we need to worry about. There are people who need loving and
souls that need saving. You cannot do either with your nose in a book.
Terry
Lance Muir wrote:
Believers use and abuse power like
everyone else. Anyone here ever do 'business' with a 'Christian'?
Anyone ever take note of 'Christians' who hold public office? Anyone
ever take note of
deacons, elders, teachers, pastors,
evangelists etc. We all err.SOMETIMES
{:-)
Lance Muir wrote:
A welcome back to the good
old TT!! What with Judy SNL'ing' Calvin and Iz speaking from the
'golden EIB microphone'; ain't it good to have things back on a more
pleasant footing?
zzy, and myself, but to
ALL OF TT, and stand by my comment that Dave's response to my request
for an apology was arrogant and insensitive.
Terry, do you get my point?
I get what you are saying. I just do not agree
with you. You are entitled to your opinion. I am entitled to mine. I
doubt th
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Wake up folks...when Dave said, Do you suppose CPL will know anything
about them, Dean, the implication was that Izzy and I were intimate.
How else would I know about her sexual experiences. Get off your
self-righteous horse, Dave, and own your bad behavior.
Perry
Dean Moore wrote:
See my reply to Perry concerning Sunday school.
Terry
cd: I see Terry -So DavH did no wrong but I am too quick to take offence
even when a lady has just been asked to tell of her sexual experiences and
the Charles has
Consider this! You constantly stirrinf the pot and pretending to know how I think may be the biggest problem of all. I suggest you put your brain in gear before opening your mouth.
Terry
cd: It is not your point that is the problem-the problem is that Terry
don't
Touche!
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
The more you stir crap, the more it stinks. - Terry Clifton,
November 27th, 2005
From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Wake up folks...when Dave said, Do you suppose CPL will know
anything about them, Dean, the implication
to be spoken to in such a manner as they may do the same to
her-seems that no decent women should be around people like you or
John.That means I wouldn't take my wife around you either-in my book
wrong manners isn't good manners.
-
Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
Dean Moore wrote:
-
Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent:
11/27/2005 1:21:13 PM
Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] Terry, let me put it in perspective for you.
I have been in the south
I would like to apologize to everyone for not being offended. I feel so
guilty.
Terry
cd: Little wonder as it was not you wife who was asked these questions-What
if someone did-How then would you feel then-Also the sinful undertones of
such a question angers the Holy
sexual
experiences, and suggesting that I know something about them, even
humorously, especially before your Christian peers? Hmmm.
From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Lance Mur says: I have a sense
Neither myth or absurd, but the normal reaction of one who lives to
please Christ. Many people hear the word. Fewer believe it. Fewer
still live it. Very few are marinated in it until it is a part of who
they are.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
myth
(absurd)
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005
Dean Moore wrote:
cd: Judy I think we are being called ignorant by Miller,Bill.and
others will add their remarks to show their superiority. Yet for a week
now they could no come to any conclusion on the meaning of one word in
the Bible-Yet us ignorant people gave the meaning of the
I would like to apologize to everyone for not being offended. I feel so
guilty.
Terry
===
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Lance, the principle I was taught is that when you offend someone you
apologize...even if you didn't mean to, even
Lance Muir wrote:
How can one person be so
consistantly wrong? Do you make these idiotic statements just to get
attention? No one misses Debbie or Jonathan. No one understands G.
John doesn't quite know what he believes and Bill has no ability to
communicate with anyone who does not
How tacky!
ShieldsFamily wrote:
You know I'll tell! :-)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dave
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 1:17 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Another darn Questionere!
DAVEH: Do
We are positionally perfected by the shed blood of the sacrifice made
for our sins, John. The Father sees us as perfect as He sees the Son.
We, however, are still playing catch up, trying to live up to our
position. Obviously, everyone on this list is still a few steps behind
and working to
ShieldsFamily wrote:
We
are
perfected through the Blood of Jesus, which washes away our sins and
delivers
us from the power of sinning anymore. We can also choose to remain in
the
state of perfection forever by faith, or we can choose to walk like the
world
again. This is
Those rare treats are much like water...all wet!
Terry
Lance Muir wrote:
CD:You sound an aweful lot like the 'Church
lady' (SNL).You are always invoking the name of Satan and,
demonstrating a remarkably low level of discernment? Sadly, I
acknowledge remaining with TT, at
Lance Muir wrote:
Evaluating the New International Version
Nice try but, no cigar Christine. It
is just possible that semantic dysfunctionality runs in the household.
(It is an ongoing problem with your Dad. He's always had the same
problem as Judy. i.e. distinguishing between
If
any other TTer would like to answer these questions-I would be
delighted.
1
After the fall can man chose to come to God on his own? The
decision to surrender to the Lordship of Christ has to be
Dave wrote:
What do you
think about the concept of a flat income tax
DAVEH: Sounds like a Christian concept to me.and, a good one at
that! :-)
==
Personally, I prefer the barter system. No tax involved.
Terry
Depends. Quilts are worth more on cold days than on hot days.
ShieldsFamily wrote:
How many
wabbits can I get for a quilt, Terry?
J
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Saturday,
November 19, 2005
7
You asked a serious question. Izzy gave you a serious answer. I am
one of those "some believers" that she mentioned.
Terry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nothing to ponderand I mean "nothing to ponder." Another
one liner by Shields that avoids any serious discussionand allows her
to
Sounds like fun, Dave, but we do not have a collection plate.
Terry
Dave wrote:
DAVEH: Have you no sense of humor, Terry? Slip a wabbit in the
collection plate now and then. If nothing else, neither the
congregation nor the preacher will ever forget you! :-D
Terry Clifton wrote
Lance Muir wrote:
As we approach that season wherein
we celebrate the coming of Immanuel, Judy raises an important point.
Who was that child born to Mary?
Do you mean Judith?
Seemed to me that we all need to read this.
Terry
Original Message
Subject:
[Infinite Supply] Wednesday, November 16, 2005
Date:
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 05:20:27 UT
From:
Watchman.Net[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We will be praying for you, David. Make a difference.
Terry and Vee
David Miller wrote:
I want to let you all know why I have been not posting lately and why I
am not likely to be posting too much on generic issues for awhile.
Two reasons:
1. The Lord has put it upon my heart to set my
This
was sent to me and I had to pass it along:
Jesus
and Satan were having an on-going argument about who was better on the
computer. They had been going at it for days, and frankly God was tired
of hearing all the bickering.
Finally
fed up, God said, "THAT'S IT! I have had enough. I
Good mornin', Dave. You might want to consider that the Jews were
given a whole sack full of commands, and not one Jew with the exception
of Jesus was ever able to keep them. We Gentile Christians were given
two commands. We aren't always able to keep even those two. Who has
ever loved their
Jesus does not talk just to make noise, John. Those who love Him hang
on every word He says. The sermon on the mount is most valuable to
me. I believe that those who divorce and remarry for reasons other
than sexual sin are living in adultery. I believe you will be blessed
when you hunger and
makes sense to me Pete. Well stated.
Terry
Peter Krostag wrote:
cd: While I am hoping that I am not one of those people afraid to think
outside the box. How can one be spiritual while breaking the law sent to
help us be spiritual.
Pete responds: It says the Law is Spiritual, not that
I tried it six times. It never did work for me.
Terry
=
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
I know how this works if anyone is interested
Perry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
What you buy when you have too much money...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20051110/lf_afp/afplifestyleusart_051110150445
Sculpture sets contemporary auction record of 23.8 million dollars - Yahoo!News.url
Description: Binary data
If you can't believe an RCC priest, who can you believe?
.ShieldsFamily wrote:
Evolution in the bible, says Vatican
From: By Martin Penner
November 07, 2005
THE Vatican has issued a stout defence of Charles Darwin, voicing strong
criticism of Christian fundamentalists who reject his
Maine is now Southern???
Dave Hansen wrote:
DAVEH: You tell me, Kevin. You claim to know the roots. I can only
quote that which I've learned.that the First Southern Baptist
Church.
was founded in 1682 and originally organized in Kittery, Maine by
the Rev.
In case you were wondering...
Original Message
Subject:
Re: silence
Date:
Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:01:32 GMT
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave,
You and I see this very much the same way. I am a follower of Christ,
a Christian. Anything beyond that is of minor importance. Terry
If you are interested only in what protestants think, then perhaps you
are on the wrong forum. WILL EVERYONE ON THE
David, I don't understand what you are trying to say. To me, Matthew 5:
32 requires no interpretation. The fact is clear. Remarriage after a
divorce for any reason other than adultery is sin. What's to
interpret? God does not see the second marriage as a marriage. He sees
one who is
have no idea what the Church of Christ might believe. I have no
problem with a Jewish Christian wedding a Gentile Christian. I have
studied Paul's teaching, but do not pretend to understand what it
means. I am not about to speculate what the Jews of Ezra's day
intended to do once they were
Sorry David, but I do not know squat about torah. Most of what I know,
I know from studying the Bible. A little of what I think I know comes
from the studies others have done.
It is my understanding that up until just a few years prior to Jesus
beginning His ministry, that an adulterous
Thanks for defining Torah for me. I was thinking Talmud.
I see no logical problem in my thinking. She is committing adultery
every time because even though her husband has grounds for divorce for
adultery, he has not divorced her. She tried to divorce him on a
ground that is not recognized by
This woman has already, in her own opinion, divorced. Since she is the
guilty party, she gets no consideration. Her real husband is now free
to divorce her, but the legal
system being what it is, it would be hard to explain why you want a
divorce when the state says you are alrready divorced.
that they have
repented and
are forgiven. What is your advice to them? izzy
-Original Message-
From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 13:08:55 -0600
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What counsel would you offer
relations
prior to their current marriage? And, as DM said, Torah forbids
reuniting with
an unclean spouse. Its a difficult situation. iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Sunday, November
06, 2005
9:23 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.or
relations
prior to their current marriage? And, as DM said, Torah forbids
reuniting with
an unclean spouse. Its a difficult situation. iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Sunday, November
06, 2005
9:23 AM
To: TruthTalk@ma
Circumcision may be nothing Christine.You can only do it once. Adultery
on the other hand , can be, and in this case is, continual sin. Those
who live in continual sin when they know that it is wrong are not
following Christ; they are living in rebellion to His command. There is
no
in this instance. He may be simply saying that jews should
not become non-jews and non-jews sould not become jews when thy come
to Christ. vv. 20 24 seem to support this interpretation.
Perry
From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk
Kevin Deegan wrote:
http://www.article8.org/docs/news_events/love_won_out/conf_1029.htm
Homosexual activists terrorize Boston church
during ex-Gay conference while police watch.
Yahoo!
FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.
That might work in Boston. In
Dean Moore wrote:
The Wesleyan church I was preaching at
had sodomites in the congregation that had been there for years and had
become a part of the church-helping with the young and such. When I
preached against sodomy and the God loves everybody( I also preached
on
ere called and hope I am not
going beyond Paul's teachings.If you are called married stay married. The
sin was in breaking the first covenant with the husband-once abandoned they
are free to marry only in the Lord.Confess that sin and go on with life.
[Original Message]
F
that this bias
does not get in the way. Dean's solution -- in the end - is the
same as mine. But his is a legal solution andmine is grace based.
Jd
-Original Message-
From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 13:08:55 -0600
Subject
Good points, David. Some things I had not considered. Still, even
without this example, Jesus indicates in Matthew 5:32 that the Verages
are living in adultery. The solution obviously is not for her to return
to her real husband, but the solution, just as obviosly, to me, cannot
be to
This little daily blurb kinda goes along with the What would you do thread.
Terry
I N F I N I T E S U P P L Y
Sunday, November 06, 2005
by Chip Brogden
http://www.watchman.net/articles/hate.html
::
If any man come to Me, and hate not
instead of throwing rocks at
them.
Terry
Dean Moore wrote:
-
Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent:
11/3/2005 7:47:56 PM
Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] Torah Jewish traditions
Leviticus 27:34 The law
I have run into the following situation at least twice. Some of you
probably have too. Here it is.
Sally was cheer leader in high school. If you were to choose a mate
strictly on physical appearance, she would be right up there among the
top five. Billy was the typical small town
It seems to me, David, that Paul observed some of the Jewish traditions
because he wanted to be all things to all people in order to win the
lost. Not because the law any longer required this.
I am a Gentile, adopted into the family, and was never under the law.
I have the freedom to
101 - 200 of 2332 matches
Mail list logo
