Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk re: continued comments under "Moderator"
Some things are beyond understanding Dean; I 'm reallysorry to hear that you are no longer
the moderator just when I was beginning to enjoy a different and more palatable list environment;
please don't go anywher
Dear TruthTalk members,
I feel it prudent to clarify many misunderstandings. Please bear with me
while I make a few posts regarding this subject of the TruthTalk moderator.
If you are new on the list, please try to overlook our dirty laundry.
Dean wrote:
I am no longer Moderator of Truth
[Original Message]
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Date: 3/14/2006 12:09:40 PM
Subject: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk Moderator
Dear TruthTalk members,
I feel it prudent to clarify many misunderstandings. Please bear with me
while I make a few posts
- Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/12/2006 9:20:45 PM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk re: continued comments under "Moderator"
Oh, yeahsorry! Ill repost under this heading: Thanks Brother Dean. J iz
cd: Judy th
:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/12/2006 10:26:41 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk re: continued comments under "Moderator"
You remember David Miller, Kevin. That would be the owner of this list. He's from Florida -- Beverly Hills, I believe. Well, on Mar
Stirring the pot is trying to do the "moderator's"
job when you are not the moderator JD
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 07:46:18 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since I wrote that post, you did it again -- obviously
to make a point, Kevin. You fly in the face of the rules and then
pretend to
- From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: 3/12/2006 9:20:45 PM Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk re: continued comments under "Moderator" Oh, yeahsorry! Ill repost under this heading: Thanks Brother Dean. J iz cd: Judy this is also a rule that does not wo
OOphs!!
Me too?Sorry brotherDean. I did just
what you say below which is "hit send" without checking the subject
line
No evil intent, just not paying enough
attention.
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 06:40:28 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
cd: Judy this is also a rule that does not work
.
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/12/2006 10:26:41 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk re: continued comments under Moderator
You remember David Miller, Kevin. That would be the owner of this list.
He's
Your inconsistency is duly noted. Like I said -- who is stirring the pot, here -- the one who questions why or the one who violates the rule? Please note this: now that Dean has made it clear that he has not intentions of honoring David's wishes, the subject is a closed matter. I now have my
cd: Judy he probably will be the next moderator:-)
- Original Message -
From: Judy Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/13/2006 7:06:34 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk re: continued comments under "Moderator"
Stirring the pot is trying to do the "m
Vote for JDDean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:cd: Judy he probably will be the next moderator:-) - Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: 3/13/2006 7:06:34 AM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk re: continued comments under
Some things are beyond understanding Dean; I 'm
reallysorry to hear that you are no longer
the moderator just when I was beginning to enjoy a
different and more palatable list environment;
please don't go anywhere.
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 19:36:31 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
DavidM couldn't possibly be THAT
busy
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:37:46 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Vote for JDDean Moore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cd: Judy he probably will be the next
moderator:-)
From: Judy Taylor
@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/13/2006 10:58:39 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk re: continued comments under "Moderator"
OOphs!!
Me too?Sorry brotherDean. I did just what you say below which is "hit send" without checking the subject line
No evil intent, just not paying enoug
Is there subterfuge going on behind the scenes? Maybe JD has been working for the Job all along.Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DavidM couldn't possibly be THAT busyOn Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:37:46 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Vote for JDDean Moore [EMAIL
:39 AM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk re: continued comments under "Moderator"OOphs!! Me too?Sorry brotherDean. I did just what you say below which is "hit send" without checking the subject line No evil intent, just not paying enough attention.On Mon, 13 Mar 2006
Why is Linda's compliment to Dean posted under the "Moderators Comment +++" heading not once, but twice? Have the rules changed on this. I know the owner of the List, David Miller (Beverly Hills , Florida) complained about this very thing yesterday, I believe.
With nearly ever post, Dean,
Are you running for MODERATerr?Vote for JD![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Why is Linda's compliment to Dean posted under the "Moderators Comment +++" heading not once, but twice? Have the rules changed on this. I know the owner of the List, David Miller (Beverly Hills , Florida) complained
Oh, yeahsorry! Ill repost
under this heading: Thanks Brother Dean. J iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 7:05
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk re:
continued comments
You remember David Miller, Kevin. That would be the owner of this list. He's from Florida -- Beverly Hills, I believe. Well, on March the 9th, he wrote this:
Dear TruthTalk list members:
If you see a post that has Moderator Comment or something similar, please do not reply to that
Are you running for MODERATerr again? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:You remember David Miller, Kevin. That would be the owner of this list. He's from Florida -- Beverly Hills, I believe. Well, on March the 9th, he wrote this: Dear TruthTalk list members:If you see a post that has
Still stirring the POT?Wicked me, I just hit reply, did not notice Thanks for pointing out this great character flaw. So ban me Why are you so INTERESTED in GNATS when you can swallow a camel? But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a
And just two posts prior to this one, you addressed a post under the subject line +Moderator Comment + I see that as a clear statement of rebellion.
jd
-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are you running for MODERATerr again?
[EMAIL
Since I wrote that post, you did it again -- obviously to make a point, Kevin. You fly in the face of the rules and then pretend to pass moral judgment on others ??!! And who is stirring the pot? The one who points to the rule or the one who wilfully violates the rule? But we are just arguing ,
I read an aritcle by NT Wright this morning in which he spoke of the "beginning" of understanding. And in conversation with Bill Taylor, recently, he commented on just how wonderful it was that our knowledge of science (specifically) put us in a better postioin, as theologians, some of what has
DAVEH: Latest Hurricane Wilma photo.
David Miller hope you are
making ready for Wilma?
Next weekend I will be
flying to Miami
to link up with a new Bible Believer chapter out there, and then preach
in the Keys at this event called fantasy fest which started this
weekend
If we receive the witness of men, the witness of God is greater; for this is the witness of God which he hath testified of his Son. (1 John 5:9) He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself (1 John 5:10) If you have trusted Christ as your Savior, the Holy Spirit indwells
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be saved means you trust Christ and have Him as your Savior.AND
YOUR LORD He's our lifeboat. He's our lifeline. He's our
only hope. We are lost without H
im, but if we have Him, we have life.
Let's forget about religion. Let's forget about all this
Actually, I did not write this piece. And "Lord " was not left out -- it isclearly there, although not in print.
Jd-Original Message-From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 15:14:12 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TruthTal
tertaining a hypothesis, if they are not also acknowledging him as
Lord.
Debbie
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 4:14
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk: Re
true religion
[EMAIL PROTEC
Oh, you are so right on, Debbie. I
believe that was Terrys whole point. izzy
Those who claim tobelieve in Christ as their
Saviour are not actually doing so, but merely entertaining a hypothesis, if
they are not also acknowledging him as Lord.
Debbie
JD wrote:
Let me know what you all are going to do
for reading material. ... Be sure to include
Title and author
I'm reading right now: Gaustad, Edwin S. and Mark A. Noll. 2003. A
documentary history of religion in America. Two volumes, third edition,
William B. Eerdmans Publishing
The ridiculousness of your doctrine apparently does not bother you.Oh well.
Jd-Original Message-From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 09:11:36 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk _ tripping out
PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk
_ tripping out -
The ridiculousness of your doctrine apparently does not bother
you.Oh well.
Jd-Original
With what frequency brother, do you say
'Huh'?
- Original Message -
From:
David Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: July 18, 2005 16:02
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk
_ tripping out -
Huh? You asked for our
orgSent: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:02:34 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk _ tripping out -
Huh? You asked for our current reading material, and when I give it you say that the ridiculousness of my doctrine apparently does not bother me? Do you want to try and s
JD wrote:
Your doctrine is that a thoughtful, prayerful,
Spirit led reading of the Bible will give you the
full intent of God in each text of the Bible --
on the first read of same.
I have never taught this. This is slanderous reporting.
What I believe is that God's Spirit reveals his
very good. Glad to see the change.
JD-Original Message-From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 19:59:05 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk _ tripping out -
JD wrote:
"Your doc
Non sequiturs are the forte of JD
and Lance, as clearly seen below. No sense trying to make sense of them. izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 2:08
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk
4 am Friday morning, me and one of the locust people are going to San Diego to see mu middle boy and the woman he is currently sleeping with -- that's get down hood talk for "wife."
Coming back on Saturday -- meeting with Robert Furgeson just before he moves to the Northeast. I David knows
TT members,
As an experiment I opened a private Yahoo group called TruthTalk_Polls.
I thought it would be interesting to hold truthtalk polls occasionally. With
so few posting, it may prove to be useless, but we can give it a try. A
yahoo group also has chat and other capabilities. I have
Perry wrote:
As an experiment I opened a private Yahoo group
called TruthTalk_Polls.
I searched for the group using TruthTalk_Polls and TruthTalk. I could not
find it. Maybe making it private makes it not come up in searches? Maybe
you need to provide a link or invitation for us to check
Great feedback.Let me check it out. I was trying to avoid allowing public
membership.
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Truthtalk Polls
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:04:11 -0400
Perry wrote
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Truthtalk Polls
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 21:07:29 -0700
Great feedback.Let me check it out. I was trying to avoid allowing public
membership.
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Interesting to see how those that have no moral Authorityenact the "BEND accomplishes the means"
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44226New billboard: 'PETA kills animals'Education effort points out nonprofit destroys 85% of pets in its shelter
Prov 12;10 A righteous man regardeth the life of his beast: but the tender mercies of the wicked are cruel.Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting to see how those that have no moral Authorityenact the "BEND accomplishes the means"
kind of
fundamentalists!
Love,
Caroline
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 10:30
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk Are we
on the same page?
Caroline Wong wrote:
This begs
om: Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 10:30 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk Are we on the same page?
Caroline Wong wrote:
This begs the question: just how many different kinds of fundamentalists are there, what is the average of all those types a
In a message dated 4/23/2005 6:17:37 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It used to be people who believed in the five fundamentals :-) Now I don't think people know what those were and who the original debaters were!
Almost sounds like you are speaking of my old buddies in the
Your buddies were not Fundamentalists, they were restorationist's to the core.
Now everybody wants to get in to the act.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/23/2005 6:17:37 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It used to be people who believed in the five fundamentals :-)
In a message dated 4/23/2005 7:37:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your buddies were not Fundamentalists, they were restorationist's to the core.
Now everybody wants to get in to the act.
Fundalmentalist to the core. I didn't say they were right. But they could beat up a
yourself a fundamentalist?
2. Kevin, are Evangelicals disobedient and if so,
how are they disobedient?
Love,
Caroline
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 8:53
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk
Caroline Wong wrote:
Okay, so youhave more to add
toTerry's original definition of what is the best kind of
fundamentalist. It seems that only (some) Baptists qualify as
fundamentalists. Evangelicals are not fundamentalists.
The next question would be
1. Terry, what is your
--- Original Message -
From: Kevin Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 8:53 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk Are we on the same page?
I think we're all here the best kind of fundamentalists!
I think NOT! These are more descriptive of a FEW on TT Some
THE FELLOWSHIP OF THE UNASHAMED
I am part of the "Fellowship of the Unashamed". The die has been cast. I have stepped over the line. The decision has been made, I am a disciple of Jesus Christ. I won't look back, let up, slow down, back away, or be still. My past is redeemed, my present makes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
THE
FELLOWSHIP OF THE UNASHAMED
I am
part of the "Fellowship of the Unashamed". The die has been cast. I
have stepped over the line. The decision has been made, I am a disciple
of Jesus Christ. I won't look back, let up, slow down, back away, or be
still. My
What I am appreciating about you, Terry, is that
(unlike some) you recognize common ground when you see it.
Debbie
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 9:42
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk
I don't know
who DA Carson is but I found the following at the Emergent Church website. I can
agree with the description of the problem; the two sides on TT do have different
worldviews and different gospels for that matter. Both focus on the
cross. One side says He did it all and I'm on
Mumbo Jumbo with a little seducing "look what I have" thrown in for good measure.Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know who DA Carson is but I found the following at the Emergent Church website. I can agree with the description of the problem; the two sides on TT do have different
In a message dated 4/19/2005 4:39:39 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
you probably don't want to know what I think about it. Who needs God when we can draw from our own wells? jt
On, Judy -- you got me laughing again. You have such a noble opinion of yourself.
JD
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 08:44:15 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 4/19/2005 4:39:39 AM Pacific Daylight
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:you
probably don't want to know what I think about it. Who needs God when we
can draw from our own wells? jt
On, Judy -- you got me
In addition to TYPOglycemia JD has comprehensionglycemia
One that whines about reading the post, should take his own medicine.Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 08:44:15 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 4/19/2005 4:39:39 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL
In Galatians 3:24-27 we have a statement from Paul that must not be ignored -- that is if someone is concerned for his or her spiritual growth.
Paul tells us that the Law was our tutor, it's purpose (for existence) found in its preparatory administration toward the Incarnation of Christ (v.
In a message dated 4/18/2005 7:59:23 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In Galatians 3:24-27 we have a statement from Paul that must not be ignored -- that is if someone is concerned for his or her spiritual growth.
Paul tells us that the Law was our tutor, it's purpose (for
I have gone back toyour post a
few times to think about and digest it, JD, and I am particularly appreciating
the section below:
Debbie
I see an individual reality and a corporate resulting (a
continuing action) described here in this Galatian passage.
It is something that happens to
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 11:11:39 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In Galatians 3:24-27 we have a statement from Paul that
must not be ignored -- that is if someone is concerned for his or
her spiritual growth. Paul tells us that the Law was
our tutor, it's purpose (for existence) found
In a message dated 4/18/2005 5:36:12 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jd in orange. Judy, do you understand that the primary reason for the article was to discuss the importance and effectiveness of immersion into Christ. That is the really big deal, here. That is what I really
Terry wrote:
Jesus said, On this rock, I will build my Church
(singular, one.)
Yes, but what did he have in mind when he said that? It seems to me that he
had the local church in mind. Taking this verse alone, it might be that he
had one gigantic worldwide church in mind, but considering
David Miller wrote:
Terry wrote:
Jesus said," On this rock, I will build my Church"
(singular, one.)
Yes, but what did he have in mind when he said that? ===
I think that when He said, "Church", He meant Church.
Terry wrote:
I think that when He said, "Church", He meant
Church. If He had meant churches, He would
have said churches.
I agree. He meant church. The question is, did he have a
specific church in mind, or did he have a huge worldwide organization in mind
like Roman Catholicism or the
David Miller wrote:
Terry wrote:
I think that when He said, "Church", He meant
Church. If He had meant churches, He would
have said churches.
I agree. He meant church. The question is, did he have a
specific church in mind, or did he have a huge worldwide
Amen and Amen,
Well said - Nothing like plainness of speech to
communicate the oracles of God.
judyt
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 17:15:54 -0500 Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Try to grt over the idea that the Church is a small or large
organization. It is neither It is a living organism,
Terry wrote:
... from my perspective, there can only be one
Cornerstone because there is only one Christ
This sounds like you don't believe that Christ is omnipresent. It indeed is
fantastic to consider that in Rev. 2 3, when Jesus stands in the midst of
the seven candlesticks, that each
Prophets may not have been in every synagogue, but it appears to me from my
study of Scripture that they were in every church. Certainly the churches
in Jerusalem, Antioch, Corinth, and Caesarea had them. Why would other
churches be any different? Maybe you
Terry wrote:
I have never felt the need for a prophet other than
Christ, so I am not too interested in them or the
way they function. With the Bible and the Holy Spirit,
I find that I have all the guidance I need.
Aw, come on, Terry. :-) Get your eyes off of yourself. You know better
David Miller wrote:
Terry wrote:
I have never felt the need for a prophet other than
Christ, so I am not too interested in them or the
way they function. With the Bible and the Holy Spirit,
I find that I have all the guidance I need.
Aw, come on, Terry. :-) Get your
David Miller wrote:
Terry wrote:
... from my perspective, there can only be one
Cornerstone because there is only one Christ
This sounds like you don't believe that Christ is omnipresent. It indeed is
fantastic to consider that in Rev. 2 3, when Jesus stands in the
---
Original Message -
From:
Dave
Hansen
To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent:
Tuesday, April 05, 2005 12:41 AM
Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk] Eternal Judgment
Debbie Sawczak wrote:
Here is how this "Protestant"
thinks
to see, we could identify them by the
Presence of
the Holy Spirit inside them. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Debbie Sawczak
Sent: Wednesday, March
30, 2005
10:24 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk]
TruthTalk] Eternal
..
- Original Message -
From:
Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: April 05, 2005 02:18
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk]
Eternal Judgment
Debbie Sawczak wrote:
Hi Dave, welcome back.
DAVEH: Thanx Debbie. Sin City is a tough
place to spend
J
DAVEH: Thanx Debbie. Sin City
is a tough place to spend a few days. May I suggest that a lessor
man (such as John, perhaps) may have succumbed while I was able to withstand
the brutal forces trying to suck money out of my pocket ;-)
Dave Hansen wrote:
DAVEH: That seems somewhat contradictory to what Paul described in Eph
2:19-20, where the fellowcitizens with the saints and the household
of God (is that not referring to the greater congregation of the
Church as a whole?) were given a foundation of apostles and
ShieldsFamily wrote:
This
non-Jew, non-Catholic, non-Cult, Christ-Follower sees it this way: The
true Church never was and never will be an Institution or Organization.
DAVEH: Do you have any Biblical evidence to
offer, Izzy?
1
Timothy 3:15
but in case I am delayed, I write so that
Terry Clifton wrote:
Dave Hansen wrote:
DAVEH: That seems somewhat contradictory to what Paul described in Eph
2:19-20, where the fellowcitizens with the saints and the household
of God (is that not referring to the greater congregation of the
Church as a whole?)
Dave Hansen wrote:
Terry Clifton wrote:
Dave Hansen wrote:
DAVEH: That seems somewhat contradictory to what Paul described in Eph
2:19-20, where the fellowcitizens with the saints and the household
of God (is that not referring to the greater
Terry wrote:
... the Church for the last two thousand or
so years has been built on the originals.
One foundation for one building is the usual ratio.
I think the Roman Catholic Church is responsible for perpetuating the idea
of ONE CHURCH existing through the last two millenia. When I read
David Miller wrote:
Terry wrote:
... the Church for the last two thousand or
so years has been built on the originals.
One foundation for one building is the usual ratio.
I think the Roman Catholic Church is responsible for perpetuating the idea
of ONE CHURCH existing
Debbie Sawczak wrote:
Here is how this "Protestant"
thinks: Jesus didn't "found a church" at all. That has jarredfor me
since childhood as athorough misunderstanding. It makes me think of a
voluntary association of people who subscribe to a new set of religious
ideas and
ean to sidetrack you--continue your conversation with
John!
Debbie
- Original Message -
From:
Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 12:41
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk]
Eternal Judgment
Debbie Sawczak wrote:
Here is how this "Protestant" thinks: Jesus didn't
"found a church" at all. That has jarredfor me since childhood as
athorough misunderstanding. It makes me think of a voluntary association
of people who subscribe to a new set of religious ideas and
practicesthought upby (or revealed to)
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Debbie Sawczak
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005
10:24 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
TruthTalk] Eternal Judgment
Here is how this Protestant thinks: Jesus
didn't found a church at all. That has jarredfor me since
childhood
Debbie Sawczak wrote:
Here is how this "Protestant"
thinks: Jesus didn't "found a church" at all. That has jarredfor me
since childhood as athorough misunderstanding. It makes me think of a
voluntary association of people who subscribe to a new set of religious
ideas and
In a message dated 3/29/2005 10:00:43 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DAVEH: Is this a commonly accepted theory of Protestantism? LDS folks believe such thinking is flawed, John. IOW.I believe Jesus founded the RIGHT CHURCH and a measured amount of legalism is important
DAVEH: Is this a commonly accepted theory of Protestantism? LDS
folks believe such thinking is flawed, John. IOW.I believe Jesus
founded the RIGHT
CHURCH and a measured amount of legalism is important and
necessary within that True Church.
What our Mormon friends do not understand and
Judy wrote:
I disagree with your assessment that Gary's
comment was similar to mine. For one thing
I don't ever enquire of Gary; but Lance was
pondering this question and I did not reply in
jest (sorry that it sounded that way).
Ok, you make a good point here. Your response was solicited by
I find your response
offensive Lance butamnot surprised
-some ppl excel in the art of the
putdown but this is not a Christlike trait.
I am disappointed as I expected more from DavidM
[Looks like I have been
wrong about some things, possiblyothers as
well]. Asfor glorying
in education,
David Miller wrote: but if they are indeed so sensitive that they
object, then we can be
big enough to work harder at making our posts less personal in nature.
The
goal is to make sure we do not cause another member to begin responding
emotionally out of self defense.
I see a
Why not ask G what grade level one has to
attain to make you intelligible to others? Izzy
The KJV Bible is written two grades
higher than Gary
gives me credit for. It is on a 10th Grade level but this should not make one
whit of adifference to the spiritually minded since
@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk Moderation
Based on the foregoing I may have to retract my comment on David's
ability
with children. At least two gold stars go on the fridge for this one.
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
