For someone whose expertise is withwords Lance,
your friend sure plays fast and loose with them.
Nowhere doesscripturesay "Christ
became sin or a sinner" - Remember? He was "begotten not
made,
of one substance with the Father" - so
even Orthodoxy disputes her thesis.
It was on the cross
Lance's
friend writes:
It's
QA, and the point I was noticing was that sinhas no existence apart
from sinners
What about the
angels who sinned and are held in chains of darkness - are they persons
also? And
BTW what is
personhood anyway? Last time I looked angels were ministering
Very interesting dialogue, Lance. I appreciate you sharing it with us.
There is much more that can be developed here. The concept of love the
sinner but hate the sin is problematic in certain contexts, but it is not
entirely a logical contradiction. The reason is that the concept of
sinner
Because I believe that homosexuality is preventable and
curable.
DAVEH: Did you/anybody happen to watch 60 MINUTES a few days ago?
It had a very interesting segment on homosexuality. And as I
understood the story, they seemed to be neutral in their
examination.which was
Great post. I would include David's response but I am still working on his comments.
Perhaps only the definition of sin exists in the abstract. We I speak of "hating the sin" I only mean that I am displeased with the effects sin is having on his person. I think it a perversion to hate the
NO Jd
Some of us believe the scriptural account which teaches
us that as a person He was "begotten" not made
The word JD is "monogenes" and it means one of a kind
and different from the rest of us who were conceived in
in sin and iniquity.
YES Jd
He did die unjustly and if you believe
the
BE WARNED!!!
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:21:33 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perhaps only the definition of sin exists in the
abstract. We I speak of "hating the sin" I only mean that I
am displeased with the effects sin is having on his person. I think it a perversion to hate the
Doesnt that prove that 60 Minutes doesnt
know a __ thing? iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Hansen
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006
9:11 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw:
excerpt redux
Because I
An example of a carnal reply. Does anyone doubt the sincerity of Linda's faith -- yet we have something that could not sound more worldly. I think this has to do with I Cor 3:1ff.
jd
Doesnt that prove that 60 Minutes doesnt know a __ thing? iz
@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw:
excerpt redux
An example of a carnal reply. Does
anyone doubt the sincerity of Linda's faith -- yet we have
something that could not sound more worldly. I think this has to do with
I Cor 3:1ff.
jd
Doesnt that prove that 60
ECTED]Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 2:26 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: excerpt redux
An example of a carnal reply. Does anyone doubt the sincerity of Linda's faith -- yet we have something that could not sound more worldly. I thin
Thanks for your example of as you say "a carnal reply"Now that I see your response I am a BELIEVER!!! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: An example of a carnal reply. Does anyone doubt the sincerity of Linda's faith -- yet we have something that could not sound more worldly. I think this has
12 matches
Mail list logo
