[tslug] Re: Folding@Home Effort

2004-09-14 Thread Nathaniel Green
General Agreeance.  In an attempt to overcome this problem, I have
played with the cpu load I assign to the process, and have found ~ 85%
to be an excellent balance of space warming and processing power, at
least with my Athlon 2500.  Weee.

Nate


On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 09:02:20 -0500, Peter Snoblin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Justin West wrote (Monday 13 September 2004 10:49 pm):
> > To join in on the effort, all you have to do is download a small app
> > that downloads a project, runs the emulation, sends the results back,
> > and repeats. This is also run as a low priority process on your
> > system, so you really don't even notice it is even running your CPU
> > at 100% all the time.
> 
> You (more than likely) won't notice any slowdown from it, but what you
> *will* more than likely notice (at least something I noticed with my
> systems) is a heat increase. Most modern processors scale back their
> operation when they don't have data to crunch, thus generating less
> heat. However, run them at 100% load all the time, and you'll (more
> than likely) see an increase in dissapated heat. It was enough of an
> effect to get me to stop doing such things. Though, if you can handle
> the heat (no pun intended :-) ), [EMAIL PROTECTED] is, in my opinion at least, an
> excellent project to support.
> 
> --
> Peter Snoblin - http://entropicaccess.net/
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To get off this list, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with Subject: unsubscribe
> -
> 
>

-
To get off this list, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with Subject: unsubscribe
-



[tslug] Re: Folding@Home Effort

2004-09-14 Thread Peter Snoblin
Justin West wrote (Monday 13 September 2004 10:49 pm):
> To join in on the effort, all you have to do is download a small app
> that downloads a project, runs the emulation, sends the results back,
> and repeats. This is also run as a low priority process on your
> system, so you really don't even notice it is even running your CPU
> at 100% all the time.

You (more than likely) won't notice any slowdown from it, but what you 
*will* more than likely notice (at least something I noticed with my 
systems) is a heat increase. Most modern processors scale back their 
operation when they don't have data to crunch, thus generating less 
heat. However, run them at 100% load all the time, and you'll (more 
than likely) see an increase in dissapated heat. It was enough of an 
effect to get me to stop doing such things. Though, if you can handle 
the heat (no pun intended :-) ), [EMAIL PROTECTED] is, in my opinion at least, an 
excellent project to support.

-- 
Peter Snoblin - http://entropicaccess.net/

-
To get off this list, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with Subject: unsubscribe
-



[tslug] Re: Folding@Home Effort

2004-09-13 Thread Raul Taranu
Or if you don't want to fold proteins, there's also GIMPS, the Great 
Internet Mersenne Prime Search.  You look for really large prime 
numbers.  If that doesn't excite you, then consider the fact that the 
Electronic Frontier Foundation is giving whoever finds the first prime 
number with more than 10 million digits $100,000 US.  So head on over to 
www.mersenne.org for more info, or contact me :-)

Raul!
-
To get off this list, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with Subject: unsubscribe
-


[tslug] Re: Folding@Home Effort

2004-09-13 Thread Nathaniel Green
This project really is worth it.  There is actual science being done
with the results of your donated cpu cycles:
http://folding.stanford.edu/papers.html

Nate

-
To get off this list, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with Subject: unsubscribe
-