Alberto Valverde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
\me blushes :*) ohhh, summer, summer... where was my mind? ;)
You should worry less about women... LOL...
--
Jorge Godoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
I would like to evaluate TurboGears for use within a personal project
and was wondering which version to use best at this point.
The evaluation focuses initially on the persistence system and would
look somehow like this:
How is the schema-evolution support (which
On 9/7/06, Ilias Lazaridis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How is the schema-evolution support (which exist within sqlobject)
provided within turbogears?
AFAIK, it's not.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Karl Guertin wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis::
How is the schema-evolution support (which exist within sqlobject)
provided within turbogears?
AFAIK, it's not.
Short Answer:
What Karl said.
Long Answer:
That being said, TurboGears does provide support for the SQLAlchemy SQL
toolkit / ORM. If you
On Sep 7, 2006, at 5:31 PM, Jonathan LaCour wrote:
That being said, TurboGears does provide support for the SQLAlchemy
SQL
toolkit / ORM. If you use SQLAlchemy rather than SQLObject, you can
use the migrate package (http://erosson.com/migrate) for doing schema
evolution and migration.
On 9/7/06, Alberto Valverde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow!! Can't wait to try it!
(Why on earth hasn't this been publicized before on this list?? ;) )
I could have sworn that Kevin has mentioned it a couple times on his
blog and I thought Jonathan had mentioned it at least once on this
list.
On Sep 7, 2006, at 9:36 PM, Karl Guertin wrote:
On 9/7/06, Alberto Valverde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow!! Can't wait to try it!
(Why on earth hasn't this been publicized before on this list?? ;) )
I could have sworn that Kevin has mentioned it a couple times on his
blog and I thought
Jonathan LaCour wrote:
Karl Guertin wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis::
How is the schema-evolution support (which exist within sqlobject)
provided within turbogears?
AFAIK, it's not.
Short Answer:
What Karl said.
Long Answer:
That being said, TurboGears does provide support for the
Jonathan LaCour wrote:
Karl Guertin wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis::
How is the schema-evolution support (which exist within sqlobject)
provided within turbogears?
AFAIK, it's not.
Short Answer:
What Karl said.
Long Answer:
That being said, TurboGears does provide support for the
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
Which version should I install in order the evaluate
TurboGears/SQLAlchemy?
The Database Explorer (CatWalk) should be operative in this version.
(I can use svn installations, e.g. latest development source, branches
etc., too)
I believe that you should be able to
Jonathan LaCour wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
Which version should I install in order the evaluate
TurboGears/SQLAlchemy?
The Database Explorer (CatWalk) should be operative in this version.
(I can use svn installations, e.g. latest development source, branches
etc., too)
I
Kevin Dangoor wrote:
On Sep 4, 2006, at 3:45 PM, Jorge Godoy wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would like to use the latest development version, if it is stable
enouth.
I'm working with the head of 1.0 branch. Including production
servers. It is
stable enough
On 9/6/06, Ilias Lazaridis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
easy_install TurboGears
retrieved version 0.8.9
easy_install -f http://www.turbogears.org/preview/download/index.html
--script-dir /usr/local/bin TurboGears
Installs the current version (0.9a9). The docs for this version are at:
Kevin Dangoor wrote:
On Sep 4, 2006, at 12:21 AM, Cliff Wells wrote:
I expect it's only a matter of time until he's claiming he's been
retained by Blazing Things, LLC to audit TurboGears despite the open
animosity the project lead Kevin Dangoor showed toward him wink.
Watch out Kevin,
Karl Guertin wrote:
On 9/6/06, Ilias Lazaridis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
easy_install TurboGears
retrieved version 0.8.9
easy_install -f http://www.turbogears.org/preview/download/index.html
--script-dir /usr/local/bin TurboGears
This hint comes to the right moment, thank's a lot.
I
Cliff Wells wrote:
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 22:55 -0400, Kevin Dangoor wrote:
Ilias emailed me after running up against trouble on the Django list.
I have looked at that wikipedia page.
Ilias had some valid points on his wiki regarding Django. I don't
mind productive criticism. I also
Cliff Wells wrote:
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 22:55 -0400, Kevin Dangoor wrote:
Ilias emailed me after running up against trouble on the Django list.
I have looked at that wikipedia page.
Ilias had some valid points on his wiki regarding Django. I don't
mind productive criticism. I also
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 06:43 -0700, Patrick K. O'Brien wrote:
Cliff Wells wrote:
So apparently Patrick is at odds with Orbtech management, which would
perhaps mark him as schizophrenic (since he *is* the management) or
Ilias is a blatant liar.
While I would rather stay out of this
On Sep 4, 2006, at 12:21 AM, Cliff Wells wrote:
I expect it's only a matter of time until he's claiming he's been
retained by Blazing Things, LLC to audit TurboGears despite the open
animosity the project lead Kevin Dangoor showed toward him wink.
Watch out Kevin, next thing you know,
On Sep 4, 2006, at 7:00 AM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
[...] - (fascinating 'analysis')
http://case.lazaridis.com/wiki/Please#PleasebePoliteandCivilized
I would like to see the meta discussion end here unless something
comes up to change that. With a 1.0b1 release imminent, we have more
Patrick K. O'Brien wrote:
Cliff Wells wrote:
...
So apparently Patrick is at odds with Orbtech management, which would
perhaps mark him as schizophrenic (since he *is* the management) or
Ilias is a blatant liar.
While I would rather stay out of this discussion as much as possible, I
Cliff Wells wrote:
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 06:43 -0700, Patrick K. O'Brien wrote:
Cliff Wells wrote:
So apparently Patrick is at odds with Orbtech management, which would
perhaps mark him as schizophrenic (since he *is* the management) or
Ilias is a blatant liar.
While I would
Ilias Lazaridis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would like to use the latest development version, if it is stable
enouth.
I'm working with the head of 1.0 branch. Including production servers. It is
stable enough for me. The trunk had some ups and downs, I'm not there
anymore. I recommend the
On Sep 4, 2006, at 3:45 PM, Jorge Godoy wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would like to use the latest development version, if it is stable
enouth.
I'm working with the head of 1.0 branch. Including production
servers. It is
stable enough for me. The trunk had some
Dogs are barking Sancho, signal that we advanced (Ladran los perros Sancho, señal de que avanzamos) Don Quijote de La Mancha - Cervantez.Sorry for the poorly googlelate of a famous quoting.
On 9/2/06, Adam Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michele Cella wrote: Ilias Lazaridis wrote: I would like to
On Sep 2, 2006, at 1:07 PM, Michele Cella wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
I would like to evaluate TurboGears for use within a personal project
and was wondering which version to use best at this point.
The evaluation focuses initially on the persistence system and would
look somehow like
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 22:55 -0400, Kevin Dangoor wrote:
Ilias emailed me after running up against trouble on the Django list.
I have looked at that wikipedia page.
Ilias had some valid points on his wiki regarding Django. I don't
mind productive criticism. I also made it clear that I
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
I would like to evaluate TurboGears for use within a personal project
and was wondering which version to use best at this point.
The evaluation focuses initially on the persistence system and would
look somehow like this:
Michele Cella a écrit :
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
I would like to evaluate TurboGears for use within a personal project
and was wondering which version to use best at this point.
The evaluation focuses initially on the persistence system and would
look somehow like this:
Michele Cella wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
I would like to evaluate TurboGears for use within a personal project
and was wondering which version to use best at this point.
The evaluation focuses initially on the persistence system and would
look somehow like this:
On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 13:33 -0700, Adam Jones wrote:
So should we feel good about being popular enough to be worth trolling,
or bad about having to deal with that in the community now? I am so
conflicted.
I feel good that we have members who are so attentive ;-)
Regards,
Cliff
31 matches
Mail list logo
