Hi Kevin,
TurboGears, unlike some packages, is *not* a CMS...
I like that clear statement.
Hopefully the community has (to some extent) a common understanding of
the implications...
http://www.rubyonrails.com/
Quite often TG looks what ROR does.
In my opinion, TG could profit through
On 12/13/05, Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.rubyonrails.com/
Quite often TG looks what ROR does.
Mind you, in this instance I was just holding up Rails' site as an
example of something that has been effective without much in the way
of dynamic features.
I've never attempted to
Jorge Vargas wrote:
My point, we should run TG site on top of TG even if it isn't necessary,
just because we should be the 1st ones to use our product.
Make it more interactive, add test site, like the one that was set up
for catwalk before it was part of tg, implement identity right on TG
On 12/12/05, Jorge Vargas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since Kevin is talking about redesign I think we should discuss this.
My point, we should run TG site on top of TG even if it isn't necessary,
just because we should be the 1st ones to use our product.
Make it more interactive, add test
On 12/12/05, Simon Belak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's make it downloadable as a TG project and add option show source
to each page.
The basic source view would be a traceback (back to framework and/or
standard library) for all modules used in rendering given page. To make
it really useful
Kevin,
Here is what the Nevow guys did. This approach was very helpfun to me
when I learned nevow.
Mike
http://nevowexamples.adytum.us/
That's pretty nice. I also like the way MochiKit samples are done:
http://www.mochikit.com/examples/interpreter/index.html
with the source links right on the page.
I am led to wonder this: which is more effective: putting a TurboTunes
demo up on TurboGears.org *or* doing a
My 2 cents: the TG Blog should be using a TG-based blog engine
*cough* Toasty Goat is coming soon *cough*
Just my new cents.
On 12/12/05, Kevin Dangoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's pretty nice. I also like the way MochiKit samples are done:
On 12/12/05, Simon Belak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin Dangoor wrote:
(to be clear: I have no issue with running TurboGears on
TurboGears.org. I just don't see the entirety of the site running on a
custom TurboGears app.)
What about if TurboGears.org would make a point of running on a
On 12/12/05, Jared Kuolt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/12/05, Kevin Dangoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/12/05, Jared Kuolt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My 2 cents: the TG Blog should be using a TG-based blog engine
As soon as there's a good enough blog engine, I'm all for that.
10 matches
Mail list logo
