[tg-trunk] Re: Turbogears and mod_python, so far they don't work

2007-02-06 Thread Graham Dumpleton
On Feb 5, 11:51 pm, Damjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW In the near feature you could use mod_wsgi http://www.dscpl.com.au/wiki/ModWsgi . It's simpler and easier to configure than mod_python (and a bit faster). I'm surprised by the comment It's simpler and easier to configure since no

[tg-trunk] Re: python 2.5 on windows

2007-02-06 Thread Kevin Dangoor
Hi Florent, Thanks for getting TG running with 2.5! That's most excellent news! I should mention that it would be good to have a 2.5 egg for Cheetah with the compiled _namemapper.pyd. Cheetah is dog slow without it. That may not matter for quickstart, but it does matter if someone actually

[tg-trunk] Re: python 2.5 on windows

2007-02-06 Thread Florent Aide
On 2/6/07, Florent Aide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/6/07, Kevin Dangoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for getting TG running with 2.5! That's most excellent news! [...] I should mention that it would be good to have a 2.5 egg for Cheetah with the compiled _namemapper.pyd. Cheetah

[tg-trunk] Re: python 2.5 on windows

2007-02-06 Thread Jorge Godoy
Florent Aide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There is a maximum attachement size in trac and the Cheetah egg is bigger ... should I post this here ? I don't believe it will make through... You can send it to me and I'll put on my machine until someone puts it on TG's website. -- Jorge Godoy

[tg-trunk] Re: python 2.5 on windows

2007-02-06 Thread Florent Aide
On 2/6/07, Jorge Godoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] I don't believe it will make through... You can send it to me and I'll put on my machine until someone puts it on TG's website. done --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are

[tg-trunk] Re: python 2.5 on windows

2007-02-06 Thread Christopher Arndt
Kevin Dangoor schrieb: Thanks for getting TG running with 2.5! That's most excellent news! Could somebody with an overview about the current situation update http://docs.turbogears.org/1.0/Python2.5Support, especially the table with the component support? Ths, Chris

[tg-trunk] Re: [PATCH] for adding options to expose()

2007-02-06 Thread Elvelind Grandin
I have to agree on Robert on this one. Expose is too big and complicated as it is. lets not add more to it. On 2/6/07, Florent Aide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I was trying to control the caching and found out I could not directly influence on this in TG so I took my svn client and said

[tg-trunk] Re: python 2.5 on windows

2007-02-06 Thread Jorge Godoy
Florent Aide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 2/6/07, Jorge Godoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] I don't believe it will make through... You can send it to me and I'll put on my machine until someone puts it on TG's website. done It is at

[tg-trunk] Re: for adding options to expose()

2007-02-06 Thread Florent Aide
On 2/6/07, fumanchu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] First, I find overloading expose in this way pretty ugly. Sorry. :/ No offense taken :) Part of the reason why I posted in this list in addition to adding the trac ticket is because a small voice in the back of my mind told me this was some

[tg-trunk] Re: python 2.5 on windows

2007-02-06 Thread Florent Aide
On 2/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The last thing is to check why widget bark this error for kid in py 2.5: I got it ! http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/1288 I know have a working 1.0.1 on python 2.5 / win32 I only have a sqlalchemy installation though. Could someone

[tg-trunk] Re: Turbogears and mod_python, so far they don't work

2007-02-06 Thread Damjan
BTW In the near feature you could use mod_wsgihttp://www.dscpl.com.au/wiki/ModWsgi . It's simpler and easier to configure than mod_python (and a bit faster). I'm surprised by the comment It's simpler and easier to configure since no real documentation has actually been made available