[tg-trunk] Re: TG 1.x releases

2008-08-22 Thread Florent Aide
On 8/21/08, Christopher Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ken Kuhlman schrieb: Sounds good to me! There's a few minor tickets with patches that I want to apply [2], but I'll get that done today. 1764: +1 on the general issue, but -1 on the implementation (see my ticket comment).

[tg-trunk] Re: TG 1.x releases

2008-08-22 Thread Graham Dumpleton
On Aug 22, 3:27 pm, Ken Kuhlman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Graham Dumpleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 22, 1:01 am, Ken Kuhlman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1.1 branch:   This branch is solid is ready to be released ASAP.   Doing it soon is

[tg-trunk] Re: Mercurial for TG2 discussion

2008-08-22 Thread Jorge Vargas
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Jorge Godoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Em Tuesday 19 August 2008 12:50:57 percious escreveu: I think SVN does not work well in the mode of development that benefits TG2 the most: the sprint. Many of our sprints are held in pods across the world. With a

[tg-trunk] Re: Mercurial for TG2 discussion

2008-08-22 Thread Jorge Vargas
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 7:12 AM, Mark Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have a new server for TurboGears.org, and Alberto asked if we could host ToscaWidgets.org there as well. This seemed like a good idea to everybody responsible to the server, but I raised the idea of switching TG2 to

[tg-trunk] My Genshi tests

2008-08-22 Thread Helio Pereira
Hi all, I'm doing some tests with templates and have this error: ⇝ TemplateSyntaxError: mismatched tag: line 33, column 6 (/home/helio/ tmp/Hello-World/helloworld/templates/testes.html, line 33) The template code near this lines is: 22 ?python 23 a = {0:zero,1:um,2:dois} 24 ? 25 26

[tg-trunk] Re: My Genshi tests

2008-08-22 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Helio Pereira schrieb: 26 Table border=0 ... 33 /table Can you tell me what is wrong here? The opening tag starts with a capital letter. -- Christoph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[tg-trunk] Re: Mercurial for TG2 discussion

2008-08-22 Thread Lee McFadden
I am +1 for hg. I've been using it for my private projects for a while now and I've ditched SVN for it for as many projects as I could. It's faster than SVN for almost everything and doesn't require internet access for those times when you want to code while traveling. On a subjective note, it

[tg-trunk] Re: My Genshi tests

2008-08-22 Thread Helio Pereira
doh... Many thanks :-P Now I realize that I can't use 'a.iteritems()' in genshi for loops... On 22 Ago, 10:53, Christoph Zwerschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Helio Pereira schrieb: 26     Table border=0   ... 33     /table Can you tell me what is wrong here? The opening tag starts

[tg-trunk] TurboGears-1.5 and transactions

2008-08-22 Thread dbrattli
Hi, With TG-1.5 we can now run database transactions as a CP3 tool instead of @expose. That way you can easily decide which controllers that gets transactions and who don't by only enabling/disabling the CP3 tool for specific controllers. I think it would be nice to get transaction handling away

[tg-trunk] Re: TurboGears-1.5 and transactions

2008-08-22 Thread Florent Aide
On 8/22/08, dbrattli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, With TG-1.5 we can now run database transactions as a CP3 tool instead of @expose. That way you can easily decide which controllers that gets transactions and who don't by only enabling/disabling the CP3 tool for specific controllers.

[tg-trunk] Re: TG 1.x releases

2008-08-22 Thread Christopher Arndt
Florent Aide schrieb: 2°/ Does anyone else have an objection to release of the 1.1 branch (1.1beta1) in 24 hours? If anyone has some patches/pet tickets please say so now. Why the sudden rush? I think we should take at least the weekend to go through the tickets in milestone 1.0.x-bugfix [1]

[tg-trunk] Re: TG 1.x releases

2008-08-22 Thread Florent Aide
On 8/22/08, Christopher Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Florent Aide schrieb: 2°/ Does anyone else have an objection to release of the 1.1 branch (1.1beta1) in 24 hours? If anyone has some patches/pet tickets please say so now. Why the sudden rush? I think we should take at least the

[tg-trunk] Re: TurboGears-1.5 and transactions

2008-08-22 Thread Mark Ramm
But to get this refactoring moving we would need to have an easy to install tg1transaction manager. I am wondering if we could not use remoze.tm in tg 1.5 since CP3 is wsgi compliant... This would make us even more close to tg2. An alternative would be to make repoze.tm into a cp3 tool.

[tg-trunk] *.turbogears.org server down

2008-08-22 Thread Christopher Arndt
It seems that the turbogears.org server just went down. I was working with Trac a couple of minutes ago but now it is not responding to HTTP or SSH anymore. I have opened a ticket at Webfaction and I'll let you know when the server is up again. Seems I have to postpone my ticket review to a

[tg-trunk] Resolved: *.turbogears.org server down

2008-08-22 Thread Christopher Arndt
Christopher Arndt schrieb: It seems that the turbogears.org server just went down. I was working with Trac a couple of minutes ago but now it is not responding to HTTP or SSH anymore. I have opened a ticket at Webfaction and I'll let you know when the server is up again. Seems I have to

[tg-trunk] Re: TurboGears-1.5 and transactions

2008-08-22 Thread iain duncan
On Fri, 2008-22-08 at 12:19 -0400, Mark Ramm wrote: But to get this refactoring moving we would need to have an easy to install tg1transaction manager. I am wondering if we could not use remoze.tm in tg 1.5 since CP3 is wsgi compliant... This would make us even more close to tg2. An

[tg-trunk] The futility of reporting bugs in Trac

2008-08-22 Thread Cliff Wells
I'd like to point out something that pushed me off of TurboGears a couple of years ago (and I was reminded of today because I happen to still be subscribed to a few bugs in Trac). See: http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/291 Notice that I filed this bug *3 years* ago. Note that *today* it was

[tg-trunk] Re: The futility of reporting bugs in Trac

2008-08-22 Thread Christopher Arndt
Hi Cliff, I was the person the person that closed this bug today. I was going through the ticket today in preparation for an anticipated TG 1.1 release and in the process tried to clear out some (!) of the really old tickets, that nobody had looked after apparently for years. I can understand

[tg-trunk] Re: The futility of reporting bugs in Trac

2008-08-22 Thread Kevin Horn
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Christopher Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hi Cliff, I was the person the person that closed this bug today. I was going through the ticket today in preparation for an anticipated TG 1.1 release and in the process tried to clear out some (!) of the really old

[tg-trunk] Re: The futility of reporting bugs in Trac

2008-08-22 Thread Cliff Wells
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 23:51 +0200, Christopher Arndt wrote: The experience of wading through all this old and obviously forgotten/neglected ticket certainly made it clear to me as well that something is amiss with our ticket handling procedures and I was thinking of writing my

[tg-trunk] Re: The futility of reporting bugs in Trac

2008-08-22 Thread Cliff Wells
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 17:51 -0500, Kevin Horn wrote: Here are the problems we had (at least from my POV): 1) We almost never had any feedback from original posters or even people who had previously worked on a given ticket. I'd suggest comparing the time of the ticket's first report and