On 5/14/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have created a JIRA [1] for this, and will take a look over the week.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1272
Thanks! I left it alone once I had been told it's not SCA. I couldn't
figure out anything that would help narrow
Today, when we run some samples or test cases, we get an annoying log4j
warnings
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (
org.apache.axiom.om.util.StAXUtils).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
I have found a way to fix that, basically by adding a project called
Axis2 binding doesn't work in webapps
-
Key: TUSCANY-1273
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1273
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Axis Binding
Affects
On 5/13/07, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
So let me try and summarize...
All samples will be:
samples/
src/
main/
sample code
client code (non-junit)
test/
junit tests
Does this mean that client code would become part of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12495510
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-1273:
- also ?wsdl has the wrong endpoint url as it leaves out the path of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12495539
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-1273:
Partially fixed now although ?wsdl is still not returning wsdl with the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-1253.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied, thanks Simon!
Update Axis2 binding for new SPIs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-1246.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Completed
Refactor package names to org.apache.tuscany.sca
+1 for this. I think the message that the technologies are separate
but complementary is important. We should not give the impression
that they are tied together in some way.
The BigBank sample developed by osoa.org did not originally have a
dependency on DAS. I think it would be good for
Support sca-contribution.xml with the webapp host
-
Key: TUSCANY-1274
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1274
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: New Feature
Components:
Lazy loading of discovered modules
--
Key: TUSCANY-1275
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1275
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Java SCA Kernel
Affects
Are the No repository found messages a consequence of this change?
I am asking because in looking though a recent maven build log,
I don't see both the log4j messages and the No repository found
messages together for the same tests.
I think both of these are pretty irritating. If fixing one
Support SCDL schema validation
---
Key: TUSCANY-1276
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1276
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Java SCA Kernel
Affects Versions:
I've raised a JIRA to track this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1276
...ant
On 5/4/07, Nicholas Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My understanding is that Tuscany does not currently validate SCDL against
the schemas. Assuming that this is correct, when do you think such
A big +1 from me to finding a way to avoid the No repository found
message.
I don't know exactly why thats happening, but its related to Tuscany not
using any Axis2 repository as all the services are defined programatically,
and suspect its to do with the way the Tuscany customized axis2.xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-1243.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Done
Update Axis2 binding for new runtime SPIs
Axis2 binding ?wsdl returns wsdl with wrong endpoint url when running in a
webapp
-
Key: TUSCANY-1277
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1277
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-1273.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Most of these points are fixed now so I'll close this one and there's a
seperate
Need factory to avoid direct use of the non-SPI class MessageImpl
-
Key: TUSCANY-1278
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1278
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
tuscany-databinding-jaxb and tuscany-databinding-sdo jar's contain test classes
---
Key: TUSCANY-1279
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1279
Project: Tuscany
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder updated TUSCANY-1265:
---
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-0.90
Disitrbution build - tuscany-sca-all-1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar is
Use singleton factory pattern for
--
Key: TUSCANY-1280
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1280
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Java SCA Kernel
Affects
With all the package name changes and SPI cleanup that have been completed
over the weekend things are looking pretty good now. I'd like to aim for
cutting an 0.90 branch this Wednesday and from then only the only changes
that go into that branch are ones that we need to do to get the release
Need to refactor some classes and interfaces to make it clear what is part of
the SPI
-
Key: TUSCANY-1281
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1281
I have opened JIRAs for the issues raised in this thread that need
further consideration or action. See comments inline below.
Simon
Simon Nash wrote:
Comments inline below.
Simon
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
[snip]
Simon Nash wrote:
1. BindingImpl is in
The webapp host uses a static to pass around WebAppServletHost
--
Key: TUSCANY-1282
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1282
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-654.
-
Resolution: Fixed
We have this now with the implementation-script module
Java SCA: Python container
snip
My suggestion was much simpler, i.e., that we could keep the client
code out of the sample extension jar and include a .class file for the
client code for these 3 samples in the binary distro. This is similar
to what real users will do when developing extensions.
Making this happen is
On 5/14/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
My suggestion was much simpler, i.e., that we could keep the client
code out of the sample extension jar and include a .class file for the
client code for these 3 samples in the binary distro. This is similar
to what real users will do
ok - well we can do that and it's pretty much zero change as that is where
we are at the moment, i.e. you have to build the sample before you run it. I
don't think providing ant scripts is a problem as we could make the run
target depend on the compile target for the three extension samples.
Better organization of the interfaces and classes in the SDO Java project
-
Key: TUSCANY-1283
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1283
Project: Tuscany
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder updated TUSCANY-1275:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-0.90)
Java-SCA-Next
Lazy loading of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder updated TUSCANY-1276:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-0.90)
Java-SCA-Next
Support SCDL schema
Hi Chris,
I don't see this failure when I run against a 1.4.2 environment ...
java version 1.4.2_07
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_07-b05)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_07-b05, mixed mode)
Which implementation / version of the JDK are you using?
Hi,
Regarding DAS release , we need to know where we are and what is still left.
So it will be really
helpful if we can talk in IRC at the proposed time. See you there.
Regards,
Amita
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe reopened TUSCANY-1260:
-
Sorry to insist on this, but after removing the test case issues mentioned the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe resolved TUSCANY-1260.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Ok, so the real issue is a dependency on
Ah, thanks Paul. I'll follow that issue to track my problem.
Thanks,
-Chris
On 5/14/07, Paul Golick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1122 records my finding that
some versions of Java 1.4.2 have BigDecimal implementation with the
problem that it fails to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12495733
]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe commented on TUSCANY-1260:
-
It seems like the distribution has the same problem, is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe reopened TUSCANY-1260:
-
Here's hoping this is the last time, and to make sure that the distro also works
This was a problem after the package renames to include .sca., it should be
going again now since about 4 hours ago (r537854), could you try with the
latest code?
...ant
On 5/14/07, Ignacio Silva-Lepe (JIRA) tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org wrote:
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12495739
]
Chris Mildebrandt commented on TUSCANY-1122:
IBM JDK 1.4.2 sr8 fails as well:
Java(TM) 2 Runtime
Luciano,
Looking at this now.
Kelvin.
On 14/05/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know if something got changed on SDO and how it track deletes
?
Even tough nothing got changed on that area in DAS, looks like some test
cases are now failing, and looks like the issue is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe resolved TUSCANY-1260.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Ok, trying with r537950 the problem is gone in the distro as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12495765
]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe commented on TUSCANY-1260:
-
BTW, would it be possible to check for an
Way back in M1 times there was an SCA AJAX binding based on DWR (
http://getahead.org/dwr/) which supported Web 2.0 style SCA services and
references using COMET / reverse AJAX asynchronous interactions with
browsers. I've got that sandbox code going again with the current trunk
code -
Here's todays weekly IRC chat log. The only topic discussed was the
SCA 0.90release, the current plan is to cut a
0.90 release branch this Wednesday.
We went through the open JIRA's targeted at 0.90 to see if anyone wanted
particular JIRA's as must fix for 0.90 and which ones could be defered.
Before my changes, we probably were getting the log4j warnings, because it
was trying to output the warning messages :
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (
org.apache.axiom.om.util.StAXUtils).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
With the proper log4j
Manifest version number in Java SDO Impl and Tools jars
---
Key: TUSCANY-1284
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1284
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Niall Pemberton updated TUSCANY-1284:
-
Attachment: tuscany-manifest.patch
Manifest version number in Java SDO Impl and Tools
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Nash updated TUSCANY-1280:
Summary: Use singleton factory pattern for default factories (was: Use
singleton factory
+1 I'll be there.
I'd also encourage anybody else that might have any issues, questions, or
last-minute requirement to stop by and participate on the discussion and
help us.
On 5/14/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Regarding DAS release , we need to know where we are and what
52 matches
Mail list logo