[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1295:
-
Attachment: JIRA1295_952_May22.txt
Cumulative changes for JIRA 1295 and JIRA 952 as
Build failure on Linux/IBM JDK
--
Key: TUSCANY-1296
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1296
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Build System
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-0.90
I've given the src and binary distros a spin on linux. My configuration is
Fedora Core5
IBM JDK 1.5.0
Maven 2.0.6
Binary:
I concur with Luciano that the READMEs for
calculator-rmi-reference
calculator-rmi-service
implementation-crud
now don't match the way that the samples are currently
OK, I agree. I note that SDO already does this. Any more thoughts about
things we can do to improve the way we can all work in this area? What else
do SDO, DAS do that SCA needs to do? Maybe we can come up with a checklist
for the build and release up on the developer guide section of the web
On 21/05/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have done necessary updates to STATUS page [1], and the Incubator
Tuscany
page [2]. Note that the changes on the incubator page takes a little while
to get reflect on the live website.
[1]
Java SDO has been doing this using an Java-SDO-Mx release rather than
Java-SDO-Next, but as I said on IRC I think the Next naming is much better.
I propose that we adopt the policy that no-one other than a release manager
ever assigns anything other than a *Next value for the fix release of a
One of the problems with not assigning the specific fix version to JIRA's
till the end is that you can't see whats outstanding from the JIRA overview
page which is something I've found useful and have used it in past releases
to manage what things need to get done. See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497879
]
Frank Budinsky commented on TUSCANY-513:
Hi Ron,
You're right that the getStaticType() method should look
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497890
]
Ron Gavlin commented on TUSCANY-513:
Got that fixed. Thanks.
Now I have run into a problem with an infinite
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497899
]
Ron Gavlin commented on TUSCANY-513:
Frank,
I temporarily worked around the problem by replacing the
I'm not clear what you're saying - Build failure seems to be a show-stopper
to me and So if we fix it... - surely we must fix it if its a showstopper
and we want to have a release?
What is the fix, from the earlier post it didn't sound like there was a good
known fix?
...ant
On 5/22/07,
I think my proposal is consistent with your desire to get the overview.
When entering the new release phase, all JIRAs fixed in the period since
the last release would be reclassified to the newly created version tag,
along with all JIRAs that the community sees as important for the
forthcoming
Ok, go ahead.
You also mentioned a JavaDoc issue before, would you like to fix that as
well or can that be left to be fixed on the next release?
...ant
On 5/22/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we are going to resping the RC, I'd like to remove the modules that are
not being
Ok :) I hadn't read the JIRA.
Simon, as you're the one that can recreate this would you be able to commit
that and test it works for you?
...ant
On 5/22/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for the confusion.
Simon found the build break and he didn't take it as a
Hi,
Sorry for the confusion.
Simon found the build break and he didn't take it as a show-stopper. I then
said the build failure is serious enough to be a show stopper.
Simon found the fix by moving the plugin to the latest version (I just
realized that he only said that in the JIRA) but he
Hi,
I've give the distros a shot on windows xp.
- The src disb. builds clean
- The tried all the samples from the binary dist just following the
READMEs. Like the others I do find the README for the rmi samples out of
sync and also the crud-client app does not run. But all the other samples
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497937
]
Ron Gavlin commented on TUSCANY-513:
Frank,
Nevermind, I think I have it working now.
- Ron
Implement
Hi,
I have updated the Extending Tuscany document with the latest SPIs and
added the Add databinding section. Please review and comment.
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/51879/ExtendingTuscany.ppt
Thanks,
Raymond
OK, so I can't get the compile to work on my linux box with a simple change
to the version/location of the maven-jaxb-plugin that the build uses. I'm
going to upgrade my JDK and see if that has a positive effect but of course
that has no bearing on the SCA release. As this problem is restricted
Thank you for the explanation.
On 5/21/07, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it's intergrated with Tuscany SDO C++.
Next step is to implement a sample for it.
I intend to add some info on wiki before the first release.
Regards,
Adriano Crestani
On 5/21/07, haleh mahbod [EMAIL
I think using XXX-Next seems more appropriate now, that we are going out of
milestone releases.
As for the JIRA process, I think that Kevin's original proposal seems good
and would be consistent no matter witch phase of development/release we are,
it also leaves room to the Release Manager to
I have fixed a small issue on on the ajax binding, that was causing a
NPE during server shutdown, and also renamed the chat sample
application to follow the same pattern other web applications were
using (e.g calculator-web).
With this, here is my +1 to get the sample added to the build.
On
Hi,
I am new to this list and product. I just wanted to know if
there is any work going on in implementing deep integration with
apache geronimo app server. If it is going on I am volunteering to
help. If not I would again like to volunteer to take up that task
along with anyone else
Hi, Manu.
Welcome to Tuscany and thank you for looking into Tuscany/Geronimo
integration.
Please see my comments inline below.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 1:00 PM
Subject: Re:
Hi,
I downloaded the 0.90 binary distro and unzipped it locally. I also deleted
my local maven repo. Then when I follow the README in
tuscany-sca-0.90-incubating\samples\calculator to run mvn to build the
samples, I get the following error as appended later.
Am I not supposed to build the
Hi Raymond,
Thank you for the warm welcome and for the prompt response. I
am adding my comments inline below.
On 5/23/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Manu.
Welcome to Tuscany and thank you for looking into Tuscany/Geronimo
integration.
Please see my comments inline below.
26 matches
Mail list logo
