On 6/17/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The component name may be nothing like the implementation name
How does that fit with the spec saying - A component type file has the
same name as the implementation file but has the extension .componentType
? I'm looking for a way to
Some CTS tests are tuscany specific due to namespace prefix assumptions
---
Key: TUSCANY-1351
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1351
Project: Tuscany
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Grove updated TUSCANY-1351:
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Some CTS tests are tuscany specific due to namespace prefix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Grove updated TUSCANY-1351:
Attachment: tuscany-1351.patch
Patch that resolves this issue by removing prefix-specific
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Grove updated TUSCANY-1351:
Attachment: (was: tuscany-1351.patch)
Some CTS tests are tuscany specific due to namespace
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Grove updated TUSCANY-1351:
Attachment: tuscany-1351.patch
New version of patch that fixes another namespace assumption.
XMLHelperTest.testDefineTypes() fails if an implementation does not
specifically use the customer namespace prefix when serializing a
document, even though it is equally valid for example to use the prefix
foo or ns0 to refer to the namespace.
I have submitted a patch for TUSCANY-1351 that
Hello,
The only version of Equinox OSGi runtime that I could find in a maven
repository that Tuscany uses is version 3.1.1 from
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/eclipse/equinox/osgi/3.1.1/ which is quite
old. Even though it is sufficient to do a build, it seems to fall over when
tests are run
On 6/18/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/17/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The component name may be nothing like the implementation name
How does that fit with the spec saying - A component type file has the
same name as the implementation file but has the
On 6/18/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/18/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/17/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The component name may be nothing like the implementation name
How does that fit with the spec saying - A component type file has
Hi Andy,
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1263 has a comment in it from
Lionel Villard ...
FYI, it exists an open source tool for comparing XML files:
http://xmlunit.sourceforge.net/ , I haven't tried it
I had been hoping to take a look at this, from both the technical and the
What will be the relationship between SCA 0.91 and DAS? I have seen
some discussions on the list about a DAS release. Will SCA 0.91 have
this DAS release as a dependency?
Simon
Luciano Resende wrote:
I have updated the wiki [1] page with things that I'm working on, and
would like to have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12505785
]
Simon Nash commented on TUSCANY-1341:
-
I have been looking at this and I have been making some progress. I
XMLUnit does look like it would provide value.
They have a proprietary license, pasted below. If you think this license
would allow us to use it within the CTS then I'd be happy to spend some time
investigating this further.
Thanks,
Andy.
/*
NPE in SDOXSDEcoreBuilder.XSDSchemaAdapterFactoryImpl.SchemaLocator.locateSchema
Key: TUSCANY-1352
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1352
Project:
On 6/18/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/18/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/18/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/17/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The component name may be nothing like the implementation name
How
Following on from recent discussion on the distributed binding (I've been
putting notes here [1])... In a Tuscany SCA runtime what do we expect the
cardinality between the various parts of it to be?
A domain notionally runs on a runtime. In the case of a stand-alone Tuscany
SCA runtime this will
Andy, to my eye the license looks OK, BUT, I'm not a lawyer and I can't
speak for the ASF. I see that there is an Apache project providing tags for
xmlunit [1], so that would give me a warm feeling, but looking in their
distribution artifacts, they don't redistribute XMLUnit and therefore
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1352.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Applied Ron's fix, thanks.
NPE in
Its just a BSD license isn't it? And so fine to use. Infact we did at one
point use Xmlunit in some of the SCA WS testcases, not sure if thats still
the case. I'd say just go ahead and use it if it does what you need.
...ant
On 6/18/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy, to my
Thanks ant, it would indeed appear to be a BSD license. Here's the
breadcrumb trail that, along with Ant's note, gives me the confidence to
feel that it's ok to go ahead with this -- the apache page [1] is forwarded
to [2] and [2] contains the section Category A: Authorized Licenses,
which
I am trying to migrate from Tuscany M2 to 0.90 (and SDO 1.0 beta 1) and I am
encountering a PackageNotFoundException: Package with uri 'http://namespace
of my data object' not found. (http:///temp.xml, 4, 62). I had to get a later
version of the SDO generator to get around the bug:
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
I am keen on adding further to the Policy support thats in Tuscany
today. I
recently run thro the Policy Framework specs and was looking into
Tuscany on
how far we had gone on this. Here's my understanding of all that. I
request people's perspective on my
Hi,
could you please help me be sure I've got this right. Do I understand
correctly that you
1) encountered the problem as described in TUSCANY-1250 (which didn't make
it into the beta1 release)
2) Rebuilt the generator to include the fix for 1250
3) following this, having regenerated your
Sorry, I'm having some restricted internet access as I'm traveling
since last week... that's probably why we haven't created a DAS
release candidate yet... but the community and I think that we are
ready to have one.
Yes, the idea is to have a DAS beta1 dependency on SCA 0.91 on the
following
ant elder wrote:
On 6/17/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The component name may be nothing like the implementation name
How does that fit with the spec saying - A component type file has the
same name as the implementation file but has the extension
.componentType
? I'm
Luciano Resende wrote:
Our continuum build is failing with some resource utilization issues :
INFO: ActiveMQ Message Broker (localhost,
ID:vmbuild.apache.org-53376-1181958568786-1:0) is shutting down
Jun 15, 2007 6:49:45 PM org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection
onAsyncException
WARNING:
The sca binding that I use in the distributed runtime has a few more
features than the one provided in assembly/core. I'd like to keep this
function separate from what has gone before. Any objections to me creating
binding-sca
or even
binding-sca-distributed
As an aside I also have a small
Thanks for the quick reply. I actually found out from the developer who rebuilt
the generator that some other updates to the SDO jars were necessary,
afterwhich the PackageNotFoundException disappeared. I am now getting a NPE
which I think may be related to the issue
Hi Luciano
Thinking back, when I originally started bringing the JMS binding back to
life I used ActiveMQ 4.1.0 and was getting errors something like this. The
error doesn't occur at 4.2 so I didn't look at it very closely. 4.2 is only
a snapshot though so not very helpful yet. If it's causing
SCADomain. getService () should follow CompositeContext.getService()
conventions for service-name
---
Key: TUSCANY-1354
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12505967
]
Simon Nash commented on TUSCANY-1341:
-
I have more news on problem (3). Further testing has shown that my
Ant,
Yes, sometimes the terminology can get confusing.
snip
The component name may be nothing like the implementation name
How does that fit with the spec saying - A component type file has the
same name as the implementation file but has the extension
.componentType
? I'm looking for a
In my investigations into TUSCANY-1341, I'have fixed a few minor
blocking defects (see my updates to the JIRA) and I'm now getting
to the heart of the problem. I think the right approach is to do
this in a similar way to callbacks over direct local wires, with
the forward call proceeding as
Hi,
Please see my comments inline below.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 5:25 AM
Subject: Domains, runtimes, components and cardinality
Following on from recent discussion
Luciano Resende wrote:
Would we also need to post process the contribution to check for
unresolved references ? I'm guessing that, file references outside
from the contribution scope will always be on the unresolved status
,and would need further processing.
On 5/29/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
DAS-RDB does not support Oracle or SqlServer well
-
Key: TUSCANY-1355
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1355
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java DAS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12506019
]
Adriano Crestani commented on TUSCANY-1355:
---
Hi,
DAS supports Oracle, but when on your code you create
I have been trying to use SDO revision 536345 (for the fix for
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1250) to generate data objects for
use with various revisions of SCA, and have been banging my head against wall
after wall. I decided to take the helloworld-ws sample from the 0.90
39 matches
Mail list logo
