Please review and vote on the 1.2 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for Java.
The artifacts are available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/sca-1.2-RC3b/
This includes the signed binary and source distributions, the RAT report,
and the Maven staging repository.
The
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
1.3 sounds good to me. I'm assuming that we'll cut that branch out of
trunk?
I'm asking because I'm interested in working on some improvements of 1.2
in the next few weeks. This shouldn't delay any 2.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12587513#action_12587513
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2145:
This behaviour was introduced in r570929 -
TUSCANY-2145 asks about SCADomain.getService () returning a proxy even when
the service doesn't exist, but looking back through the SVN history it looks
like this is intentional. Before I close the JIRA does anyone have any
comments on if this is/isn't the correct behaviour?
...ant
+1 throw an exception.
The scenario like this class.getMethod(methodName).
If a matching method is not found,it will throw NoSuchMethodException.
Thanks,
Wang Feng
On 2008-04-10,ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TUSCANY-2145 asks about SCADomain.getService () returning a proxy even when
the
The current distribution build copies the binary artifacts to the
target-last-successful folder which takes about 130Meg. I'm guessing this is
something to do with the continuum builds but does anyone know for sure? If
so could we change it so it only happens on the continuum machine (have the
Hi Jose,
javax.wsdl.Definition.getAllPortTypes() is a method which is present in
the jar file wsdl4j-1.6.2.jar which comes with tuscany.
Just have a look if you the same version jar . In case you do have ,
verify whether any other jar file has the same class javax.wsdl.Definition
which
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Wang Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 throw an exception.
The scenario like this class.getMethod(methodName).
If a matching method is not found,it will throw NoSuchMethodException.
Thanks,
Wang Feng
On 2008-04-10,ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12587574#action_12587574
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-2109:
-
I've also just checked in the test case that
Hi,
I have a requirement as given below:Can you please guide me if this can be
done or any alternative is available.
To do composition , I need to write my SCDL file and the implementation
java class(lets say ComposerImpl.java), Now If the composition is to be
done by the End user/Client all
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Wang Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 throw an exception.
The scenario like this class.getMethod(methodName).
If a matching method is not found,it will throw NoSuchMethodException.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:45 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Wang Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 throw an exception.
The scenario like this class.getMethod(methodName).
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12587556#action_12587556
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-2109:
-
Hi
Yes. I think you are right. We need to
Hi All,
Looking at the history of JIRA's (2170, 2085, 2092) raised due to
ConcurrentModificationException, its evident that our runtime would throw
more such exceptions in the coming days, such problem occurs if two threads
try to add a contribution simultaneously. Also the above mentioned JIRA's
Also check that both Classes loaded with application class loader first
and Single class loader for application are selected in the app config in
the websphere admin panels to make sure its picking up the Tuscany jars from
the app not the one included in WAS.
...ant
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:12 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
1.3 sounds good to me. I'm assuming that we'll cut that branch out of
trunk?
I'm asking because I'm interested in working on
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:12 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
1.3 sounds good to me. I'm assuming that we'll cut that
Hi,
I'm currently facing issues when attmepting to utilise the wsdl
generated by a service exposed using binding.ws, when I use wsdl2java
with this wsdl I get the following exception:
IWAB0399E Error in generating Java from WSDL: java.io.IOException:
Emitter failure. Cannot find endpoint
-Original Message-
From: ant elder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 April 2008 12:26
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: SCA 2.0, was Re: Next SCA release
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:12 AM, ant elder
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Mark Combellack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: ant elder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 April 2008 12:26
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: SCA 2.0, was Re: Next SCA release
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:01 PM,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12587629#action_12587629
]
Mike Edwards commented on TUSCANY-2109:
---
Folks,
It is right to be concerned over
Luciano Resende wrote:
I have noticed that the approach we used for GSoC, where we described
small project ideas, with a proper description and a suggested
scenario to guide the development of the idea is generating much more
interest from the community.
[1]
Luciano Resende wrote:
Please review and vote on the 1.2 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for Java.
The artifacts are available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/sca-1.2-RC3b/
+1. It downloaded, unpacked, and ran acceptably on my system. No errors
spotted.
--
Hi
A few clarifications in line.
Simon
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yang Lei wrote:
Hello,
I have the following usage scenarios that I currently use
EmbeddedSCADomain's ContributionService to accomplish. When I look at
the new set
Hi,
Thanks Ramkumar for looking into these concurrent issues.
Before we jump into a solution/fix, I suggest that we step back and agree on
whether the Tuscany core and extensions should be bootstrapped sequentially
or concurrently. A few use cases would be helpful. Can some of the JIRA
Hi,
These are all good comments. I suggest that we carry on discussions on
tuscany-dev ML instead of JIRA :-).
Raymond
--
From: Mike Edwards (JIRA) tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 6:02 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12587657#action_12587657
]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-2214:
---
We could use
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thanks Ramkumar for looking into these concurrent issues.
Before we jump into a solution/fix, I suggest that we step back and agree
on whether the Tuscany core and extensions should be bootstrapped
sequentially or
Raymond,
So, for 2085 for example, we have multiple different modules that, when
activated, may do an addDatabinding on the defaultDBExtensionPoint.
Eventually.. later...someone comes along and uses this to do an
introspectType. At that point the loadDataBindings() is done.
That all seems to
Destory method is not called if scope type is request
-
Key: TUSCANY-2215
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2215
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Mark Combellack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Version 2.x will be the main focus
* Most of the development effort happens on Version 2.x
* We will make API changes which means that it will not be backwards
compatible with version 1
* Version
DefaultContextFactoryExtensionPoint handling of null should be improved
---
Key: TUSCANY-2216
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2216
Project: Tuscany
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12587765#action_12587765
]
Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-2216:
--
Updated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Combellack resolved TUSCANY-2216.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Added unit test for DefaultContextFactoryExtensionPoint in 646940
Hi Simon,
I dont think using an underlying tuscany jdk logger would be useful to
plugins as they may not want to log, rather show it somewhere else such as
console etc. Tuscany can use an underlying logger in it's own monitor ( as
it uses today). But i think the first approach of using a monitor
Hi Hasan
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Hasan Muhammad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
I dont think using an underlying tuscany jdk logger would be useful to
plugins as they may not want to log, rather show it somewhere else such as
console etc.
Agreed. Thinking about this some more
And here is some guidelines for how to rank proposals.
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/general/RankingProcess
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For those who had volunteered as mentors for GSoC 2008, it's time for
us to rank the proposals. In order to
Hi Mike
Some comments in line
Simon
Folks,
It is right to be concerned over the interface matching, but let's not
lose sight of the context here.
In general, there are two scenarios to consider:
a) the reference is to a service which is defined within the SCA domain
and SCA
And one last recommendation :
Pleae only vote +4 if you are a mentor or co mentor.
+2 is the highest the rest of us should vote.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And here is some guidelines for how to rank proposals.
[1]
Comments inline.
Simon
Simon Laws wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Mark Combellack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: ant elder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 April 2008 12:26
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: SCA 2.0, was Re: Next SCA release
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Dan Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
Please review and vote on the 1.2 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
The artifacts are available for review at:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently facing issues when attmepting to utilise the wsdl
generated by a service exposed using binding.ws, when I use wsdl2java
with this wsdl I get the following exception:
IWAB0399E Error in generating Java
Hi Luciano,
I recalled you proposed me as co-mentor of the idea I had proposed: SLA
for Tuscany Application. Will you be the mentor of it?
What should I do? Can I sign in as the mentor of the project
service-level-agreement-for-tuscany-applications at Google Code's
website.
Regards,
Mario
Luciano,
+1 from me.
Download installed fine, built the src first time, tried the binary
distro and all the samples + tutorial I tried worked for me. Licenses
etc look fine too.
Good job - well done.
Yours, Mike.
Luciano Resende wrote:
Please review and vote on the 1.2 release
Thanks for checking Mario
We got a not so strong proposal around SLA, so I'm not sure what to
do with it. But we have other proposals that we might need help. if
the SLA one does not get approved, would you be willing to mentoring
other proposals as well ?
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:59 PM,
Hello,
I was able to run some of the modules of the tutorial. However, I would need
some help to understand what are the different modules meant for and in which
order I must run the modules in order to get, let's say, store-merger running.
The problem is that no matter what combinations I
Should this be added to the list of projects under get involved page that you
added?
-Original Message-
From: Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 4:58 PM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [(GSoC] Time to rank the Google Summer of Code Proposals
Should this be added to the list of projects under get involved page that you
added?
-Original Message-
From: Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 4:58 PM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [(GSoC] Time to rank the Google Summer of Code Proposals
Hi Simon,
I found the problem ( and solution) in my project... problem is.. i m using
one of old version of jaxb while tuscany is using jaxb2... :)
thanks for your support
--
Thanks
Nishant Joshi
49 matches
Mail list logo
