Build failure in DataBinding module

2008-05-07 Thread Chris Trezzo
Hey Everyone, I have attempted a build of the Tuscany trunk code using revision 653996. I am following the development guide [1], and simply running the mvn command in the /java/sca directory. I encountered an IllegalArgumentException during the SimpleTypeMapperExtensionTestCase. Below is

Re: Tuscany support an usage of binding.ws wsdl.service

2008-05-07 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
I am running the service as part of a vtest using tuscany-host-tomcat. When I use wsdl.port instead of wsdl.service in wsdlElement, the service is running on the url as given for that port in the wsdl file. ++Vamsi On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: Is there are simple straightforward way of creating a Compoisite

2008-05-07 Thread ant elder
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Cool thats really helpful. Ok so if we can have a Tomcat TuscanyHost (i.e. an extension of org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost not related to the Tuscany host stuff) that will get its addChild method

Re: Is there are simple straightforward way of creating a Compoisite

2008-05-07 Thread Simon Laws
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:55 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Cool thats really helpful. Ok so if we can have a Tomcat TuscanyHost (i.e. an extension of org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost not

Re: Is there are simple straightforward way of creating a Compoisite

2008-05-07 Thread ant elder
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not clear if the domain here is intended to be local to the webapp container, in which case it could reasonably do webapp processing on the local file system, or if it is a more general domain out there in the network

Re: Is there are simple straightforward way of creating a Compoisite

2008-05-07 Thread ant elder
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip This is not quite what we need in the Tomcat case. I shouldn't need to write a NodeX.composite file for each webapp as we can say each webapp is a node, use the webapp name for the node name, and use the webapps

Re: Tuscany support an usage of binding.ws wsdl.service

2008-05-07 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
Opening different ports by the hosting environment does not seem to be a problem because when I use service name=AService binding.ws name=p11 wsdlElement= http://wsbinding.vtest.sca.tuscany.apache.org#wsdl.port(AService/AServiceSOAP11port_http) / binding.ws

question on the JMS binding and databindings for XML TextMessage

2008-05-07 Thread Scott Kurz
I have a question on the JMS binding. If I were set up I'd just experiment, but let me just ask It looks to me like we're requiring the service client/impl to use OMElement as its programming model (i.e. app databinding). I say this looking at class JMSBindingReferenceBindingProvider and

Re: Tuscany support an usage of binding.ws wsdl.service

2008-05-07 Thread Simon Nash
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: I am running the service as part of a vtest using tuscany-host-tomcat. When I use wsdl.port instead of wsdl.service in wsdlElement, the service is running on the url as given for that port in the wsdl file. Thanks, this confirms that Tuscany has a bug with

Re: Tuscany support an usage of binding.ws wsdl.service

2008-05-07 Thread Simon Nash
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: Opening different ports by the hosting environment does not seem to be a problem because when I use service name=AService binding.ws name=p11 wsdlElement= http://wsbinding.vtest.sca.tuscany.apache.org#wsdl.port(AService/AServiceSOAP11port_http) /

Re: Tuscany support an usage of binding.ws wsdl.service

2008-05-07 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: Opening different ports by the hosting environment does not seem to be a problem because when I use service name=AService binding.ws name=p11 wsdlElement=

Generated WSDL Target Namespace calculation not spec compliant?

2008-05-07 Thread Lou Amodeo
Hi, It doesnt appear that Tuscany is implementing section 2.3.2 of the WS Binding specification completely. Can you explain the algorithm used for reference and service side WSDL TNS generation for service, ports, and bindings. Thanks. The target namespace of the WSDL document, and of the

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2298) Incorrect service endpoint when wsdl.service is used with Service webservice binding

2008-05-07 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA)
Incorrect service endpoint when wsdl.service is used with Service webservice binding Key: TUSCANY-2298 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2298

Re: Tuscany support an usage of binding.ws wsdl.service

2008-05-07 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
Done. Opened TUSCANY-2298. ++Vamsi On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: I am running the service as part of a vtest using tuscany-host-tomcat. When I use wsdl.port instead of wsdl.service in wsdlElement, the service is running

Problem using HttpBinding with service binding.ws

2008-05-07 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
I am getting an error while trying to use HttpBinding with service binding.ws. I am trying to run this service as part of a vtest project using tuscany-host-tomcat and tuscany-binding-ws-axis2 modules. Wondering what I am doing wrong. Here is my wsdl: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2298) Incorrect service endpoint when wsdl.service is used with Service webservice binding

2008-05-07 Thread Simon Nash (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12594983#action_12594983 ] Simon Nash commented on TUSCANY-2298: - The problem is in the start() method of

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2299) Client-set callback id not preserved on stateless callback

2008-05-07 Thread Kevin Williams (JIRA)
Client-set callback id not preserved on stateless callback -- Key: TUSCANY-2299 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2299 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-2294) Add OSGi manifest entries to Tuscany modules

2008-05-07 Thread Rajini Sivaram (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajini Sivaram closed TUSCANY-2294. --- Resolution: Fixed Changes checked in under revision 654236. Add OSGi manifest entries to

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-2292) Remove split-packages across modules in Tuscany

2008-05-07 Thread Rajini Sivaram (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajini Sivaram closed TUSCANY-2292. --- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Rajini Sivaram Fixed under revision 654236. Remove

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-2293) Assembly-xsd module defines xsds in the default package

2008-05-07 Thread Rajini Sivaram (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajini Sivaram closed TUSCANY-2293. --- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Rajini Sivaram Temporary fix to use TCCL to load the

Re: What's next for SCA BPEL Integration

2008-05-07 Thread Mike Edwards
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Are you guys still making changes to the BPEL code? I'd like to be able to work with BPEL components in the domain without having to boot the whole runtime. I'd like to do it sometime later this week but for that to work I'll need to split implementation-bpel in

Re: What's next for SCA BPEL Integration - component type update done

2008-05-07 Thread Mike Edwards
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Are you guys still making changes to the BPEL code? I'd like to be able to work with BPEL components in the domain without having to boot the whole runtime. I'd like to do it sometime later this week but for that to work I'll need to split implementation-bpel in

Re: What's next for SCA BPEL Integration - component type update done

2008-05-07 Thread Luciano Resende
Cool Mike, this is very good improvement for the bpel impl... BTW, could you please check if you have committed one of the new model classes : BPELPartnerLinkTypeExt On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Are you guys still making

Re: Build failure in DataBinding module

2008-05-07 Thread Luciano Resende
Hi Chris I just compiled the modules with no problems under revision #654394. Please try the following command : mvn -fae clean install Please let us know if you still have issues. On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Chris Trezzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Everyone, I have

Re: What's next for SCA BPEL Integration - component type update done

2008-05-07 Thread Mike Edwards
Luciano Resende wrote: Cool Mike, this is very good improvement for the bpel impl... BTW, could you please check if you have committed one of the new model classes : BPELPartnerLinkTypeExt On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Luciano, The class

Re: Build failure in DataBinding module

2008-05-07 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, This is a known issue with some JDKs that doesn't behave consistently in the XML gXXX data type conversions (I guess you are running Mac OS?). You can safely ignore the problem for now. Please open a JIRA to track it too so that I can make the test case more tolerant. Thanks, Raymond

Re: GSoC Project - CORBA Support for Apache Tuscany

2008-05-07 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, Wojtek. I'm glad to see you make progress. Please submit incremental patches with JIRAs as you improve the code. This way, we can review and apply them so that the community knows what's evolving. Thanks, Raymond -- From: Wojtek Janiszewski

Re: Build failure in DataBinding module

2008-05-07 Thread Chris Trezzo
Hi Raymond, Yes I am running Mac OS 10.5.2. I will open a JIRA. Thanks for the response. Chris On May 7, 2008, at 8:43 PM, Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, This is a known issue with some JDKs that doesn't behave consistently in the XML gXXX data type conversions (I guess you are running Mac

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2300) performance issues in DataFactoryImpl, TypeImpl, DataObjectImpl, SDOXMLWriter

2008-05-07 Thread JIRA
performance issues in DataFactoryImpl, TypeImpl, DataObjectImpl, SDOXMLWriter - Key: TUSCANY-2300 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2300 Project: Tuscany

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2300) performance issues in DataFactoryImpl, TypeImpl, DataObjectImpl, SDOXMLWriter

2008-05-07 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stanisław T. Findeisen updated TUSCANY-2300: Attachment: tuscany-patch1-do-czytania.tgz performance issues in

Re: build failure in store-test

2008-05-07 Thread Luciano Resende
When using the sql-maven-plugin to generate the databases, we have to explicitly close the databases otherwise the unit tests won't be able to open the database. This can be done with the snippet below, these changes are needed in both tutorial-store-db and tutorial-store-supplier :

Re: Build failure in DataBinding module

2008-05-07 Thread Chris Trezzo
Hi Luciano, It took a couple of times to download some of the dependencies for the wsdl2java tool, but eventually all were downloaded. I did not run into any other issues using mvn -fae clean install. Thanks for the response. Chris On May 7, 2008, at 7:51 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: Hi