On 4/23/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 4/18/08, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/18/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Ram
snip
In case of JSON-RPC binding (our original scenario), when the interface is
not defined @Remotable the runtime just ignores the data transformation
between the binding without throwing any exception.
In you test do you have binding.jsonrpc on reference and service sides? If
On 4/18/08, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/18/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
TUSCANY 1881, talks about throwing a warning msg when adding remote
bindings
to services with interfaces not marked as
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/18/08, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/18/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
TUSCANY 1881, talks about throwing a warning
TUSCANY 1881, talks about throwing a warning msg when adding remote bindings
to services with interfaces not marked as remotable, by which the data
transformation might get messed up.
From the current implementation, I understand that the datatransformation
interceptor will not be inserted in the
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TUSCANY 1881, talks about throwing a warning msg when adding remote
bindings
to services with interfaces not marked as remotable, by which the data
transformation might get messed up.
From the current implementation, I
On 4/18/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TUSCANY 1881, talks about throwing a warning msg when adding remote
bindings
to services with interfaces not marked as remotable, by which the data
transformation might
