2007/11/7, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Giorgio
Thanks for the info, some comments below.
Regards
Simon
On 11/7/07, Giorgio Zoppi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/11/6, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Giorgio
Am just applying your patch to make repeated @OneWay invocations
Hi Giorgio
Thanks for the info, some comments below.
Regards
Simon
On 11/7/07, Giorgio Zoppi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/11/6, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Giorgio
Am just applying your patch to make repeated @OneWay invocations work to
the
tunk and it's looking good as I'm
On 11/7/07, Giorgio Zoppi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/11/7, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Giorgio
Thanks for the info, some comments below.
Regards
Simon
On 11/7/07, Giorgio Zoppi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/11/6, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Giorgio
On 11/7/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Giorgio
Thanks for the info, some comments below.
Regards
Simon
On 11/7/07, Giorgio Zoppi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/11/6, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Giorgio
Am just applying your patch to make repeated @OneWay
2007/11/6, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Giorgio
Am just applying your patch to make repeated @OneWay invocations work to the
tunk and it's looking good as I'm getting a clean build and the new onway
itest now runs. (Am just updating your workpool demo to trunk level as well
- more in
Hi Giorgio
Am just applying your patch to make repeated @OneWay invocations work to the
tunk and it's looking good as I'm getting a clean build and the new onway
itest now runs. (Am just updating your workpool demo to trunk level as well
- more in this later) In the mean time I'm interested in