Re: Getting rid of AtomicComponent

2007-03-07 Thread Jeremy Boynes
On Mar 7, 2007, at 6:42 PM, Jim Marino wrote: When we convert over to the federated marhsallers, I think we can get rid of AtomicComponent and just have Component. To do this, we would need to move some of the lifecycle getters such as conversational lifetime, etc. to Component. The other

RE: Getting rid of AtomicComponent

2007-03-07 Thread Meeraj Kunnumpurath
-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: Getting rid of AtomicComponent On Mar 7, 2007, at 6:42 PM, Jim Marino wrote: When we convert over to the federated marhsallers, I think we can get rid of AtomicComponent and just have Component. To do this, we would need to move some of the lifecycle

Re: Getting rid of AtomicComponent

2007-03-07 Thread Jim Marino
On Mar 7, 2007, at 9:57 PM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote: A related question I had was, wouldn't most of the logic in JavaComponent etc for handling properties, introspection etc go into the generated instance factory bytecode? I believe so. I just stubbed out the methods from