Re: Tuscany Native M3 release

2007-02-23 Thread Geoffrey Winn
I've changed my mind about changes to SDO that should be in M3. I've just checked in an alteration to Type::getProperties that is good for a 25% speed-up in the overall execution of SDO. (See TUSCANY-1136, r510951). I would like to see that included in M3. Regards, Geoff. On 19/02/07, Geoffrey

Re: Tuscany Native M3 release

2007-02-23 Thread Pete Robbins
Good stuff. Anything checked in will be included. I'm not ready yet to freeze the release. We have a few problems with Python and Rest on linux and I haven't yet tried out the new PHP extension. I've made changes for building the distribution for Linux but still need to make some changes on

Re: Tuscany Native M3 release

2007-02-19 Thread Geoffrey Winn
Pete, There are no pending changes in SDO that we should wait for if you are looking to generate a candidate this week (week beginning 19-Feb). I will aim to complete as much as I can from 1078 (which may help resolve some php issues), 959 (which I am part way through) and 747 (load an XML

Re: Tuscany Native M3 release

2007-02-16 Thread Geoffrey Winn
On 15/02/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll review the SCA Jiras and we can agree on which are must-fix for the release. Can someone review the SDO C++ Jiras and propose a list of must-fix? I'll do the JIRA review for SDO C++ Geoff.

Re: Tuscany Native M3 release

2007-02-16 Thread Pete Robbins
On 16/02/07, Geoffrey Winn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 15/02/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll review the SCA Jiras and we can agree on which are must-fix for the release. Can someone review the SDO C++ Jiras and propose a list of must-fix? I'll do the JIRA review for SDO