Recently looked at the logging code too and the only
example I caught with its
usage was a unit testcase. But this has mock
artifacts that is not a good
example to point to learn from. I have roughly the
same questions that Sebastien
wrote.
This question has come up a few times before
rick rineholt wrote:
I also forgot to ask is just by taking a quick glance through some
code the logging you get is largely determined by which monitor
factory is being used to initialize the runtime with. It seems we
have two implementations of this factory to offer NullMonitorFactory
and
I agree, shorter names are more readable.
I used shorter names for the JavaScript samples, have a look and see if
thats better or you can suggest better names or structure:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/samples/JavaScript/
...ant
On 4/7/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Yea I think you're right. I didn't even notice it - I'll fix them now.
On Apr 7, 2006, at 7:36 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Jim
I think you said you recently switched to IDEA and I think that
resulted
in some import ...*; declarations creeping in during your refactor.
I thought this came
Guillaume Dufrene wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote :
To define your SDOs you need to write an XML schema and run it
through our SDO generator. Another option, if you don't want to write
an XML schema is to start contributing to Tuscany and help us
implement our Java interface - SDO
I'm going through the changes to the assembly model to reconcile logical
and physical models and I need some help and clarifications with the
following:
- Scope was initially defined only as a Java5 annotation. We already
have it in the logical model, but it's not in the XSD. Has the SCA spec
We added an extension to SCDL to allow the user to import a WSDL
definition that was being used in a interface.wsdl element. This also
has the side effect of installing the schemas from the WSDL into the SDO
type system.
This got me thinking what we should also allow the user to import a
schema
I agree we need to add more logging (but not too much imo, e.g.
exceptions should only be logged at container breaches and not as
they are propagated up the various Tuscany layers) and examples.
The monitor factory will be configured as a system service, as
opposed to currently being
In case this didn't get through gmail...
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: April 7, 2006 10:02:21 AM PDT
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Does SDO 2.0 have logging capability such as JSR47?
I agree we need to add more logging (but not too much imo,
Yes this should be possible by configuring the monitor system service
I mentioned in the previous email. I would imagine that most end
users would not configure this but it would rather be part of the
embedding process - i.e. on Tomcat we would have an out-of-the-box
configuration that
Yea for some reason it was set at 5 and it nicely changed things
for me. I cleaned the stuff up and gave IntelliJ a good trout-slapping.
Jim
On Apr 7, 2006, at 7:36 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Jim
I think you said you recently switched to IDEA and I think that
resulted
in some import
Pete Robbins wrote:
Is the order of entryPoint...s, component...s, externalReference..s,
wire...s, any defined by the specification? If so then is moving the
import.xxx location the correct thing to do?
The order is defined (see the schema for exact details).
We modified the schema to add
The 0.9 assembly specification defines a format for the URI in a
interface.wsdl as:
WSDL-namespace-URI#wsdl.interface(portType)
for example
interface.wsdl interface=
http://foo.org/StockQuoteService#wsdl.interface(StockQuote)/
I have trouble parsing this mentally. Are the '#' delimiter
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
Is the order of entryPoint...s, component...s, externalReference..s,
wire...s, any defined by the specification? If so then is moving the
import.xxx location the correct thing to do?
The order is defined (see the schema for exact details).
On 07/04/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If nobody objects, I can move the wsdl.import up in the XSD. I'm in the
middle of changes to this project anyway.
Where in the source tree is the schema you are using? Is it in spec/... ?
--
Pete
Ignore that.. I found it :-(
On 07/04/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where in the source tree is the schema you are using? Is it in spec/... ?
--
Pete
--
Pete
Move to JSR 47 logging
--
Key: TUSCANY-155
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-155
Project: Tuscany
Type: Improvement
Components: Java DAS RDB
Reporter: Kevin Williams
Priority: Minor
We should move from our custom
17 matches
Mail list logo
