Not sure I understand this. I guess its to do with the
ExtensibleURLArtifactProcessor that strips off the extension and
searches for processors only by those extensions. So even if the
URLArtifactProcessor.getArtifactType() returned 'definitions.xml' we'd
still have a problem. I guess we have
Cool, if you can wait a day, i can take a look at that...
Sebastien suggestion seems ok:
Instead of URLArtifactProcessor.getType() returning
.composite for *.composite files
definition.xml for definition.xml files
URLArtifactProcessor.getType() could return
*.composite for *.composites files
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Venkatakrishnan reassigned TUSCANY-1518:
Assignee: Venkatakrishnan
Insufficient error message, Pass-by-value not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518623
]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-1496:
---
Patch applied under r564107. Thank you, Simon.
Simplify the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Venkatakrishnan resolved TUSCANY-1518.
--
Resolution: Fixed
The exception message will now include the the class name of the
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Not sure I understand this. I guess its to do with the
ExtensibleURLArtifactProcessor that strips off the extension and
searches for processors only by those extensions. So even if the
URLArtifactProcessor.getArtifactType() returned 'definitions.xml' we'd
still have a
On 8/9/07, shaoguang geng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today, I found in respond to each request, Tuscany instantiate new one
class for each. I tried binding.ws, it works as well.
SCA1.0 does not specify instance management of a component, but I remember
J2EE does not mentioned such things for
:) thanks. That makes sense to me.
- Venkat
On 8/9/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Not sure I understand this. I guess its to do with the
ExtensibleURLArtifactProcessor that strips off the extension and
searches for processors only by those
On 8/8/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin Williams wrote:
I am interested in extending the current locate service capability to
support the location of services that may be running within the same
domain but a separate jvm. The most straightforward approach may be
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
[snip]
Simon Nash wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
[snip]
2) We could branch for the 1.0 release to contain the candidate
modules
and keep doing 1.0 developement in the branch and merge them into the
trunk. I'm not sure how feasible it is.
+1
I
On 8/9/07, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
[snip]
Simon Nash wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
[snip]
2) We could branch for the 1.0 release to contain the candidate
modules
and keep doing 1.0 developement in the branch and merge them into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518654
]
Adriano Crestani commented on TUSCANY-1465:
---
- On ReadCommandImpl.setResultDescriptor(List) you are
The binding-ejb one was a mistake
host-embedded/ReallySmallRuntimeBuilder creates a SCABindingProcessor
I'll go fix the first one and test against the latest code
Thanks
Simon
On 8/9/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what required these dependency changes:
-
ant elder wrote:
On 8/9/07, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
[snip]
Simon Nash wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
[snip]
2) We could branch for the 1.0 release to contain the candidate
modules
and keep doing 1.0
Nice idea, I have no objections about your propose. But, I think we need
some more opnions from those who helped to implement Java DAS, mainly the
ColumnConverters.
Regards,
Adriano Crestani
On 8/7/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With JIRA-1465, ResultDescriptor can be set
On 8/8/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please update the following too
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/etc/set_svn_properties.sh
On 8/7/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following appear to be missing from etc/svn-props
DISCLAIMER =
Thats right, these are the Axis2 tools just with some patches on top to add
support for SDOs and to fix bugs we've come across before we got the bugs
fixed in the Axis2 code. The problem with doing it like this has been we
fall be hind Axis2 and loose track of what we changed and its a headache to
On 8/9/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Sure, 1.0 development should happen in trunk, but I was trying to
respond to a different point brought up by Raymond.
On Aug 18, we are going to cut the August release branch. The point is
about allowing small changes, bug fixes
Comments inline.
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
Currently getServiceReference() expects a service name so we can rely
on the implication that all contributed composites are notionally included
into the domain level composite to reference a component and extend
Sebastien's process to say.
Just to
Hi,
Theres been lots of discussion. So let me summarize my understanding
/ imaginiation : -
- We will cut a branch around Aug 18th for Release 0.95. As always,
once the branch is cut we need to be watchful on the commits
(including getting the RMs nod to significant ones) to the branch and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518670
]
Adriano Crestani commented on TUSCANY-1464:
---
- On code below, it checks for the fk COC that is table_id,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1445.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
On 8/9/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments inline.
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
Currently getServiceReference() expects a service name so we can rely
on the implication that all contributed composites are notionally
included
into the domain level composite to
As part of the binding.ws on the fly wsdl generation i've been struggling
with creating a working Tuscany WSDLInterface object from a JavaInterface
object. I just can't seem to get things set up correctly so a complete
invocation flow works and the data binding interceptor works correctly doing
This is technically feasible (see other discussion on this thread)
but I think we need to be careful about how wide open we are making
the services within a Tuscany SCA domain. I don't think we want
every service within every domain to be wide open for anyone to reach
down from the sky and call
sounds sensible to me, +1 to handling this within Axis2.
Kelvin.
On 09/08/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats right, these are the Axis2 tools just with some patches on top to add
support for SDOs and to fix bugs we've come across before we got the bugs
fixed in the Axis2 code. The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518687
]
Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1522:
--
The problem is with the following code in the visitField()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518690
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1006:
-
Looks good to me -- caters for all possibilities. Will this be
Ant talked about cutting the branch very early next week. I'd prefer
that to doing it on August 18th. I will be away for a few days,
returning home late on the 18th, and I could take advantage of the
extra couple of days to help with last-minute things.
Simon
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
The Assembly Specs and the PolicyFramework specs allows for intents
and policysets to be specified on Operations.
To implement this I'd expect that the Operation interface support
methods to hold a set of required intents and policysets. This also
seems in sync with the schema definition
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518709
]
Amita Vadhavkar commented on TUSCANY-1465:
--
Hi , am checking for your comments for 1464 and 1465, will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518711
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-1465:
I wonder if this is case where be liberal in what we accept, conservative
I've just noticed that if I have a contribution directory as follows
/my/contribution/dir/mycomposite.composite
And I pass the source URL /my/contribution/dir to the contribution service
it complains that it can't find /my/contribution/mycomposite.composite.
If I pass the source URL
On 8/9/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, i've been seeing this today as well, seemed to be fine earlier in the
week.
...ant
On 8/9/07, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seeing
java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect
errors when building
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518716
]
Adriano Crestani commented on TUSCANY-1465:
---
I agree with you ant, I applied the patches from JIRA 1465
Yes, i've been seeing this today as well, seemed to be fine earlier in the
week.
...ant
On 8/9/07, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seeing
java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect
errors when building binding-ws-axis2 from a clean checkout of trunk.
The failure is
The vote to release Apache Tuscany SDO 1.0-incubating has completed
with 5 +1 votes being cast (3 IPMC binding) and no -1s (see the
tuscany-dev list vote thread [1] and the incubator-general vote
approval thread [2]). Thank you for reviewing and voting.
I will therefore proceed with the
This is so bad for me now that i can no longer get a build through of the
Axis2 binding, always one of the tests will fail with the connect exception.
I've just tried on a spare machine and that is working fine. Both machines
are winxp with jdk5, the only difference i can see is that the one that
Kevin and I are considering in extending the current locate service with
a mechanism that is aware of the composite context. That is, services
exposed by a domain level composite would be visible to all and services
available on other composites would only be visible to the containing
The Apache Tuscany team are pleased to announce the 1.0-incubating release
of the Java SDO project.
This project provides an implementation of the SDO 2.1 specification
[1] and this is our first release to provide full coverage of the
specification. In addition to completing the few remaining SDO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518747
]
Scott Kurz commented on TUSCANY-1473:
-
This problem looks similar to TUSCANY-1342 which I opened. I commented
Folks, I am planing to create my own folder (venu) in java/sca/itests and
write few sample tests. Can any one please post if you have any guidelines
on writing pom.xml (\java\sca\itests\venu\pom.xml) to include my sample
tests for maven to build and execute.
Thanks,
Venu.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Gavlin updated TUSCANY-1006:
Attachment: tuscany-sdo-impl.TUSCANY-1006.patch
Patch attached.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Gavlin updated TUSCANY-1006:
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
ChangeSummaryImpl.cachedSDOObjectChanges appears to not be thread
You could use some of the other project existing pom[1] as guidelines.
The poms are all inheriting the necessary configuration to run the
tests from the parent pom [2] and it looks like below :
!-- surefire plugin configuration --
plugin
Could you try moving to maven 2.0.5 on the one that does not work ?
On 8/9/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is so bad for me now that i can no longer get a build through of the
Axis2 binding, always one of the tests will fail with the connect exception.
I've just tried on a spare
I need some advice on the way the code is structures. In various places in
the code I need to get at some information that logically belongs to the sca
domain. For example,
CompositeWireBuilderImpl.connectComponentReferences()
Tries to resolve services. In the distributed case this resolution
Hi Venu,
To start with, you could also simply copy over one of the poms in the
existing itests and modify the artifact names, dependencies etc. that
is specific to what you plan to do.
- Venkat
On 8/9/07, venu reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks, I am planing to create my own folder (venu) in
Hi,
I tried checking out java and eclipseefying the build, but I get this error:
1 required artifact is missing.
for artifact:
org.apache.tuscany.sca:sample-helloworld-dojo:war:1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT
Thoughts?
Thanks,
- Ole
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
The Assembly Specs and the PolicyFramework specs allows for intents
and policysets to be specified on Operations.
To implement this I'd expect that the Operation interface support
methods to hold a set of required intents and policysets. This also
seems in sync
Enhance ArtifactProcessors to be registered for file names, as well as for file
types
-
Key: TUSCANY-1523
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1523
Simon Laws wrote:
I need some advice on the way the code is structures. In various places in
the code I need to get at some information that logically belongs to the sca
domain. For example,
CompositeWireBuilderImpl.connectComponentReferences()
Tries to resolve services. In the distributed
venu reddy wrote:
Folks, I am planing to create my own folder (venu) in java/sca/itests and
write few sample tests. Can any one please post if you have any guidelines
on writing pom.xml (\java\sca\itests\venu\pom.xml) to include my sample
tests for maven to build and execute.
Thanks,
Venu.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luciano Resende resolved TUSCANY-1328.
--
Resolution: Fixed
This scenario is now working, and I also added a test case in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518771
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1182:
-
TUSCANY-1006 also discussed a multi threaded test case. I am
What version of maven are you using ? Does it work with maven 2.0.5 ?
See more info here [1]
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg21031.html
On 8/9/07, Ole Ersoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I tried checking out java and eclipseefying the build, but I get this error:
Need to fix file permission with DAS beta1 release distros
--
Key: TUSCANY-1524
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1524
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518779
]
Paul Golick commented on TUSCANY-1328:
--
What svn revision includes the fix?
can not locate service from a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luciano Resende updated TUSCANY-1328:
-
Test cases in working state added in revision #564288
can not locate service from a
documentBaseURI is incorrect in wsdl Definition
---
Key: TUSCANY-1525
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1525
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Lou Amodeo
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lou Amodeo updated TUSCANY-1525:
Attachment: WSDLDocumentProcessor.java
documentBaseURI is incorrect in wsdl Definition
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
Your latest proposal sounds good.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message - From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2007 7:20 PM
Subject: Re: Dynamic registration of databindings, was: 0.91 Memory
I guess early the following week still leaves time for an August release.
It will be real tight though so we'll all need to be quick and thorough with
our RC reviews as one problem once we get to the IPMC voting and it could
easily slip it into September.
So does taking the branch on the 21st
Sebastien and Simon,
Thanks for this conversation. Its been very helpful. I would like to
recap a little and ask a couple of questions.
At the highest level the steps to locate a service are:
1. Look locally and if found proceed as Tuscany does today, otherwise
2. Dynamically create a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Brady Johnson updated TUSCANY-1438:
---
Attachment: tuscany_patch_update9_jira1438
Adding the ability to compile in debug mode.
On 8/9/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
- Post 0.95, maybe a couple of weeks after the release, we'd cut
another branch and head with that for 1.0 release. Being a 1.0
release, we prob. need a branch early as that so that we can whet the
things we are targetting for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Brady Johnson updated TUSCANY-1509:
---
Attachment: tuscany_patch_update1_jira1509
Adding the ability to compile in debug mode.
Hello all,
I added two new features to the SCA and SDO ant build system.
The first is the ability to compile in debug mode. To compile debug,
just do one of the following:
- from the command line ant -Ddebug=true # set it to on, yes, or true
to turn on debugging
- platform.properties file set
On 8/9/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/9/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
I need some advice on the way the code is structures. In various
places in
the code I need to get at some information that logically belongs to
the sca
Doesn't seem to make any difference. I guess it must be differences between
the local repositories as everything else seems to be the same.
...ant
On 8/9/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you try moving to maven 2.0.5 on the one that does not work ?
On 8/9/07, ant elder
Comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: Accessing global domain information
On 8/9/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/9/07,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Yoder updated TUSCANY-1375:
---
Attachment: TUSCANY-1375.txt
This patch privatizes the internal helper classes used in SDO
Hi,
I have uploaded a patch for TUSCANY-1375. If it could be reviewed and
applied that would be great.
Thanks,
Michael
Rogue Wave Software, Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Developer -
HydraSDO
-Original Message-
From: Michael Yoder (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518904
]
Amita Vadhavkar commented on TUSCANY-1465:
--
1) The way ResultDescriptor can be replaced on a Command is
On 8/10/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: Accessing global domain information
On 8/9/07, Simon
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1464:
-
Attachment: 1464.patch
1)In case of if (columnName.indexOf(_ID) = 0), and indeed if
On 8/9/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
The binding-ejb one was a mistake
host-embedded/ReallySmallRuntimeBuilder creates a SCABindingProcessor
I'll go fix the first one and test against the latest code
Thanks
Ah OK. If you're talking about
77 matches
Mail list logo
