Is this C++ specific issue? I see the below output for DAS Java -
RelationshipTests.testRelationshipModification2() - which is correct
behavior.
Before move of order from cust2 to cust1
?xml version=1.0 encoding=ASCII?
cust1:cust1 xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adriano Crestani resolved TUSCANY-1827.
---
Resolution: Fixed
SDO Types based PK map needed in GraphMerger
Sorry, item 2 was my fault, not a sdo c++ problem. But the item 1 question
remains.
Adriano Crestani
On 10/8/07, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting upset about how change summary logs a isMany property.
1- What does Setting ChangeSummary::getOldValue( DataObjectPtr
Not sure about C++ , but below is what happens in java impls. Giving example
xsd, test case and result (and 1 question)
-
test
I've been getting a build fail in helloworld-ws-reference-secure for a while
now with the error below, does anyone else see this?
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 10.703 sec
FAILURE!
testEmbeddedReferenceClient(helloworld.HelloWorldClientTestCase) Time
elapsed:
Yes, I am seeing this from a mvn clean ; mvn on
r582825
On 10/8/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been getting a build fail in helloworld-ws-reference-secure for a
while
now with the error below, does anyone else see this?
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time
JMS Binding does not conform to the specification when creating JMS queues
--
Key: TUSCANY-1836
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1836
Project: Tuscany
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1836:
-
Attachment: JMSQueueCreateModes_Tests.patch
JMSQueueCreateModes.patch
On 9/24/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/22/07, Joseph, Roshan IN BLR SISL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I believe the JMS binding is not included in the latest release and if
it is due to bugs, I would like to contribute in making it work. Can
someone point to the
Yes. I too see this and am right now fixing it. Regret the inconvenience.
- Venkat
On 10/8/07, Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I am seeing this from a mvn clean ; mvn on
r582825
On 10/8/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been getting a build fail in
Fixed under r582882. The sample is now going ok for me. Could you also
try, please ?
Thanks
- Venkat
On 10/8/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. I too see this and am right now fixing it. Regret the
inconvenience.
- Venkat
On 10/8/07, Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL
Works for me now, thanks!
...ant
On 10/8/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fixed under r582882. The sample is now going ok for me. Could you also
try, please ?
Thanks
- Venkat
On 10/8/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. I too see this and am right
The Tuscany PPMC and Incubator PMC have voted for Amita Vadhavkar to
become a Tuscany committer.
Congratulations and welcome Amita!
I look forward to your continued excellent contributions to Tuscany.
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
Congrats Amita :D
Adriano Crestani
On 10/8/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tuscany PPMC and Incubator PMC have voted for Amita Vadhavkar to
become a Tuscany committer.
Congratulations and welcome Amita!
I look forward to your continued excellent contributions to Tuscany.
Same here.
On 10/8/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Works for me now, thanks!
...ant
On 10/8/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fixed under r582882. The sample is now going ok for me. Could you also
try, please ?
Thanks
- Venkat
On 10/8/07, Venkata
On 10/8/07, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congrats Amita :D
Adriano Crestani
On 10/8/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tuscany PPMC and Incubator PMC have voted for Amita Vadhavkar to
become a Tuscany committer.
Congratulations and welcome Amita!
I
A big welcome from me Amita, you really deserve this.
...ant
On 10/8/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tuscany PPMC and Incubator PMC have voted for Amita Vadhavkar to
become a Tuscany committer.
Congratulations and welcome Amita!
I look forward to your continued
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to figure out if there is a common pattern in how
implementations and bindings could be interpretting and applying policies so
that we could include this in the SPI. But haven't been successful with
this. Maybe with getting policies to work with a
Raymond Feng wrote:
I'd quite like to see some transformation going on , i.e. something
like an
implementation.xslt. Isn't Saxon also an XSLT processor so can we
already do
this?
The XSLT is already in the JDK (javax.xml.transform or TrAX). Apache
Xalan is one of the implementations.
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I put together a demo application to showcase our XML integration
story. The business scenario is derived from the bigbank demo and the
main function is to calculate the total value (using a selected
currency) of a customer who has checking/saving/stock accounts.
At
Raymond Feng wrote:
More comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message - From: Scott Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: Pass-by-value interceptor
Maybe it would help for me to point out that I'd opened
Amita,
Congratulations and welcome.
Well deserved.
Yours, Mike.
Luciano Resende wrote:
The Tuscany PPMC and Incubator PMC have voted for Amita Vadhavkar to
become a Tuscany committer.
Congratulations and welcome Amita!
I look forward to your continued excellent contributions to Tuscany.
Hi,
The code above is from DataObjectListImpl.cpp. As far as I know, when a DO
is removed from a non-containment Property, it should not loose its
container. Although, when it's removed from a list it's not checking if the
property is containment or not, it always set the removed DO container as
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
In a short answer, yes. We should try to create a dummy element in
such case. I believe we already do that for DOM. Do you want to
provide a patch :-)?
Thanks,
Raymond
Could you help a me understand why a dummy element is needed?
--
Jean-Sebastien
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
As I am extending policy support for implementations I realize that we have
trouble with aggregating intents and policysets in an JavaImplementation
instance. The reason for this is that JavaImplementation instances could be
reused in cases where two or more
ant elder wrote:
On 10/1/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On 9/29/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Here's sample code to illustrate that use case:
Hi,
When we introspect the simple types on a java method, we map it to a xsd
type, such as java.lang.String to xsd:string.
When it's converted to some databindings which requires an element (such as
DOM or AXIOM), we need to have an xsd element. The element information can
be derived from
ant elder wrote:
On 10/1/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On 9/27/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Why all the static and abstract methods? Is there a reason SCADomain
couldn't just be an interface with a
Luciano Resende wrote:
Hey Douglas
Thanks for volunteering, maybe you could start by prototyping the
JDBC version of implementation-data that would return a
XMLStreamReader. Once we flush out the design details, then we could
think about the other CUD operations.
Sebastien, and others...
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
When we introspect the simple types on a java method, we map it to a
xsd type, such as java.lang.String to xsd:string.
This may be a dumb question :) why don't we convert a method parameter
(I guess that's what you meant) to an element in the first place?
Isn't
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to figure out if there is a common pattern in how
implementations and bindings could be interpretting and applying
policies so
that we could include this in the SPI. But haven't been successful with
this. Maybe
Comments inline.
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I spent more time reviewing the XQuery implementation type. I think
it's a great addition to our XML story. Let me share some of the
questions and suggestions I have so far.
1) The implementation.xquery model
The current code only supports:
We have been talking about deriving/populating the element information for
parameters and return value of a java method following the java2wsdl rules.
I agree with you that should be the right direction.
There are a few cases:
1) If the java interface is generated from WSDL, we can try to get
ant elder wrote:
On 10/2/07, Douglas Leite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After reading the SCA developer guide I had some doubts about the
checkstyle
and pmd. I have installed those like plug-ins in the Eclipse IDE. However,
what I would like to know is if there is some specific configuration
Adriano,
This indeed seems to be a bug. Go ahead and write a JIRA please.
Thanks
Best regards,
Brady
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Adriano Crestani
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 3:43 PM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: [SDO
I think the pluggability of the factory is still there, same as
SCADomainFactory.newInstance().
SCADomainFactory.newInstance() can follow the typical factory pattern to
search for the sub class of SCADomainFactory.
1) The META-INF/services/org.apache.tuscany.sca.SCADomainFactory
2) The
Thank all of you for the feedback.
More comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: A demo application to showcase our XML integration story
Raymond Feng wrote:
- I think we should try to remove all Java code from the demo and try
to implement CustomerAsset (or AccountService) as a BPEL process or
an XQuery function.
Ant was proposing to have a java script component :-). I'm open.
I am proposing BPEL and/or XQuery here
Raymond Feng wrote:
We have been talking about deriving/populating the element information
for parameters and return value of a java method following the
java2wsdl rules. I agree with you that should be the right direction.
There are a few cases:
1) If the java interface is generated from
DataObject having its container set as NULL when removed from a non-containment
property
Key: TUSCANY-1837
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1837
Hi Amita, the link below is unavailable. I will be waiting for your new words
here. Thank you.
Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,
I have gathered some comments about work going on in JIRA-1816, JIRA-1700
and the draft Tx Policy Spec below. Also tried to list some scenarios.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adriano Crestani resolved TUSCANY-1837.
---
Resolution: Fixed
bug fixed on revision 583039
DataObject having its container
Hi,
Please see the one
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Design+Discussion
the page was moved, as TUSCANYWIKI is the correct place for discussions etc.
By mistake I first created under TUSCANY
Please give your comments there.
Regards,
Amita
- Show quoted text -
On
Thanks everyone for the congratulations and welcome. It is a great
experience working with you all. I am looking forward to
the next exciting progress in Tuscany community and will try my best.
Regards,
Amita
On 10/9/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amita,
Congratulations and
44 matches
Mail list logo
