Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Tuscany M1 released!

Hi, Can/will this be announced in the top level apache announcement mailing list? http://www.mail-archive.com/announce@apache.org/ Kelvin.

Kevin Bauer is out of the office.

I will be out of the office starting 06/08/2006 and will not return until 06/13/2006. I will respond to your message when I return. For urgent messages please contact my backup Thomas F Mutdosch/Durham/[EMAIL PROTECTED] or my manager Jay Cagle/Raleigh/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[C++] C++ / PHP BOF at apache con

I believe Pete was thinking of trying for a C++ BOF at ApacheCon in a few weeks time. In the C++ release IRC on Tuesday ( http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg03746.html) there was discussion of trying to get a simple sample, based loosely on the big bank scenario, running

C++ release distribution zip and layout

In the Tuscany C++ source tree we have a subproject for SDO and one for SCA (which prereqs the SDO build). For a binary release should we combine the build output into a single zip ro have a separate SDO zip? If we do combine them we have a further option of the unzipped layout having a separate

Re: Recursive core architectural overview

Jeremy Thanks for the detailed reply. Geronimo has private lists for stuff under NDA and has had various people on different expert groups (e.g. a couple of us were on JSR-220). In general, there are a lot of Apache projects that work with the JCP and deal with the closed nature of JSRs -

Re: [C++] C++ / PHP BOF at apache con

I am hoping to have a bigbank back-end coded by apachecon - it would be good to have another language as the front end to show WS interop On 08/06/06, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe Pete was thinking of trying for a C++ BOF at ApacheCon in a few weeks time. In the C++ release

Re: [C++] C++ / PHP BOF at apache con

Oh Dear, that pretty much answers that then. Is this just a statement for this time or are them stopping BOFs in future events too. You could always retire to the pub! I still think we should do what we discussed and put a PHP front end on the demo that you are constructing for C++ SCA. So lets

Re: Private/PPMC list

Any progress on this? Jeremy Boynes wrote: I have seen in a couple of offlist email discussions about prospective committers but I am concerned that not all committers may be on them. IIRC Ant had suggested we create a private or PPMC list for all committers and I think that would be a good

Re: Project IP, was: Recursive core architectural overview

Thanks Jeremy I fully understand the ICLA and CCLA process. After all as an Apache Committer I've signed one and I also was involved in pushing Steve Gerdt at IBM to develop a corporate policy for CLAs when I was at IBM. As regards the feedback license, I wasn't questioning the ability for

Re: Type definitions in composites, was: [PATCH] Porting SDO DataBinding to the new SPI in Jeremy's sandbox

Hi, It's a challenge but it also opens a good opportunity for us the figure out how to align the SCA composition hierarchy with the databinding model scopes. I think there will be two perspectives on both the Tuscany and the databinding sides. 1) How does the databinding framework support

Re: Type definitions in composites

Raymond Feng wrote: BTW, we already started a thread on scoping for SDO types. Could you post a link - I couldn't find it? Thanks -- Jeremy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: Type definitions in composites

It's on the user mailing list: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-user/200606.mbox/date Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 12:23 PM Subject: Re: Type definitions in

Re: DAS Command/CommandGroup and TUSCANY-231

We should explore collapsing CommandFactory and CommandGroup since they are really both factories for commands. This new combined factory could still support the simplest commands that require a SELECT and no configuration. A command that does require configuration might be retrieved by name

Re: Tuscany blog

I don't think it really matters where we put it - we can publicise it via the aggregator and on the Tuscany website. I think ant should just kick one off, give committers access, and we'll see how it goes. I'm not a committer (maybe.. one day :-) ) but I think it would be a worthwhile thing to do

Re: Tuscany blog

+1 from me too. I'll be happy to contribute DAS content. Andrew Borley wrote: I don't think it really matters where we put it - we can publicise it via the aggregator and on the Tuscany website. I think ant should just kick one off, give committers access, and we'll see how it goes. I'm not a

Meeting: Apache Tuscany Architecture Overview

Hello , Kenneth Tam has invited you to join a meeting on the Web, using WebEx Topic: Apache Tuscany Architecture Overview Date: Friday, June 9, 2006 Time: 7:30 am, Pacific Daylight Time (GMT -07:00, San Francisco) Meeting number: 924 170 615 Meeting password: tuscany Please click the

SVN Properties

I did a big checkin Saturday to fix problems with SVN properties that were incorrectly set due to incorrect configurations on some of Jim and my machines. I have a feeling we may not be alone so I would like ask folks to check their default settings, especially for svn:keywords which should be

Re: SVN Properties

I think Jeremy is being charitable in taking some of the blame; it was mostly my (new) machine. Thanks for fixing. Jim On Jun 8, 2006, at 4:31 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: I did a big checkin Saturday to fix problems with SVN properties that were incorrectly set due to incorrect configurations

Re: Type definitions in composites, was: [PATCH] Porting SDO DataBinding to the new SPI in Jeremy's sandbox

Hi, Jeremy. Here's the patch with correct SVN property settings. Please try again. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 7:07 AM Subject: Type definitions in composites, was: [PATCH]

Re: Type definitions in composites, was: [PATCH] Porting SDO DataBinding to the new SPI in Jeremy's sandbox

Sorry, I was supposed to create two patches, one for the update and the other one for the new feature. Here're the splitted patches. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 7:07 AM

Re: SVN Properties

Jeremy, On Thursday June 08 2006 7:31 pm, Jeremy Boynes wrote: I did a big checkin Saturday to fix problems with SVN properties that were incorrectly set due to incorrect configurations on some of Jim and my machines. I have a feeling we may not be alone so I would like ask folks to check

Re: [PATCH] Upgrade container.spring in Jeremy's sandbox to Spring 2.0-M5 level

Hi, Ken. Thank you for pointing it out. Maybe it won't accept files with extension patch? Anyway, here's the patch again. Raymond - Original Message - From: Kenneth Tam [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 5:47 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH] Upgrade

Re: Tuscany blog

+1 .. and I'd be happy to help and contribute with contents for the blog... Note that I have also started one in portuguese, to share with the Brazillian Java Community available here : http://tuscanybrasil.blogspot.com/ I also just got started with my own blog where I plan to talk about

Re: C++ release distribution zip and layout

OK... as I need to start on this several days ago I'm going to produce seeparate zips for SDO and SCA. On 08/06/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the Tuscany C++ source tree we have a subproject for SDO and one for SCA (which prereqs the SDO build). For a binary release should we