equals method is not overridden and hashcode generated is different for
PortType comparison in BPELImplementationProcessor class
Key: TUSCANY-2328
Hi All,
I have raised TUSCANY-2304 which was actually blocking me to go further with
SCA client. So It was given high priority to resolved and fortunately Ant
has resolved it very fast, i appreciate his effortt, thanks alot Ant for
this :).
Another one was TUSCANY-2251 that was handled by Simon
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12598229#action_12598229
]
Mike Edwards commented on TUSCANY-2328:
---
Ashwini,
Thanks for catching this one.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Edwards reassigned TUSCANY-2328:
-
Assignee: Mike Edwards
equals method is not overridden and hashcode generated is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2329:
-
Attachment: TUSCANY-2329-Part1.patch
itests for validation messages
itests for validation messages
--
Key: TUSCANY-2329
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2329
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Integration Tests
Affects Versions:
Thanks Simon, itests for these validation messages are now available with
TUSCANY-2329.
On 5/19/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just checked in Ram's patch to convert validation messages (i.e. those
messages indicating that the user have provided invalid input of some form)
to
Nishant Joshi wrote:
Hi All,
I have raised TUSCANY-2304 which was actually blocking me to go further with
SCA client. So It was given high priority to resolved and fortunately Ant
has resolved it very fast, i appreciate his effortt, thanks alot Ant for
this :).
Another one was TUSCANY-2251 that
Calculator sample running in OSGi
-
Key: TUSCANY-2330
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2330
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Wish
Components: Java SCA Samples
Affects Versions:
I've submitted a patch to add the sample (Jira 2330).
2008/5/20 ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sounds good to me.
...ant
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Graham Charters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I now have the Calculator sample running using all the great work
Rajini did to use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Graham Charters updated TUSCANY-2330:
-
Attachment: calculator-osgi-sample.patch
Calculator sample running in OSGi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-2283.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix committed at r658275. I've enabled the vtest also.
Conversation should
Got expection where the wsdl defines an operation without input
---
Key: TUSCANY-2331
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2331
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gilbert Kwan updated TUSCANY-2331:
--
Attachment: BService.wsdl
Got expection where the wsdl defines an operation without input
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12598337#action_12598337
]
Gilbert Kwan commented on TUSCANY-2331:
---
Surely will do it later. Understand that
Thanks thats helpful. Let me take this to the extreme so you can point out
where it loses the plot to help me understand what you're saying:
The idea is eventually there might be standardized interfaces for all the
SCA runtime plug points, many of the Tuscany things for the various SCDL and
SPI
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12598433#action_12598433
]
Rajini Sivaram commented on TUSCANY-2330:
-
Graham,
For some reason, I was
So, in the case where we replace the ODE Process Store module with one
implemented by Tuscany, is this new module going to be responsible for
handling all the versioning and matching a running process instance
with the right BPEL process version ?
Also, can the modules that handle deploy.xml and
Luciano Resende wrote:
So, in the case where we replace the ODE Process Store module with one
implemented by Tuscany, is this new module going to be responsible for
handling all the versioning and matching a running process instance
with the right BPEL process version ?
Also, can the modules
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Edwards resolved TUSCANY-2328.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix committed in 658449.
Changed BPELImplementationProcessor to compare
Hi Adriano,
I was indeed using the sca modules not from the sandbox. As you suggested, I
removed the tuscany-contribution-impl from my workspace and added the
version you uploaded to the sandbox. Then, I uncommented the lines in
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
So, in the case where we replace the ODE Process Store module with one
implemented by Tuscany, is this new module going to be responsible for
handling all the versioning and matching a running
Responses inline...for some reason my email client is mishandling the
formatting, so I'll mark my responses with dab /dab
Dave
- Original Message -
From: ant elder
To: scabooz
Cc: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]
Just a reminder that the Coding Phase starts next week (May 27th).
I'd like to encourage mentors to get their students in the release
early, release often mode, and get patches submitted very frequently
(every day or every other day)... This would also make review process
much easier, as the
Looks like we are still missing CLA from :
- Douglas Siqueira Leite
- Haibo Zhao
Have you guys submitted them already ?
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 4:11 AM, Wojtek Janiszewski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Luciano,
I've submitted CLA and now my full name (Wojciech Janiszewski) is
listed on
25 matches
Mail list logo
