default true. User will need to pass
FALSE
option if this is not desired (For XML_LOAD_SCHEMA - Boolean.FALSE,
for
XML_LOAD_LAX_FORM Integer(0))
As the mail [Tuscany SDO] JIRA-1317 - questions/doubts says -
ResolvableImpl
- is not in working condition, no code changes done to it.
Also
will assume default true. User will need to pass
FALSE
option if this is not desired (For XML_LOAD_SCHEMA - Boolean.FALSE, for
XML_LOAD_LAX_FORM Integer(0))
As the mail [Tuscany SDO] JIRA-1317 - questions/doubts says -
ResolvableImpl
- is not in working condition, no code changes done to it.
Also
will assume default true. User will need to pass
FALSE
option if this is not desired (For XML_LOAD_SCHEMA - Boolean.FALSE, for
XML_LOAD_LAX_FORM Integer(0))
As the mail [Tuscany SDO] JIRA-1317 - questions/doubts says -
ResolvableImpl
- is not in working condition, no code changes done
default true. User will need to pass FALSE
option if this is not desired (For XML_LOAD_SCHEMA - Boolean.FALSE, for
XML_LOAD_LAX_FORM Integer(0))
As the mail [Tuscany SDO] JIRA-1317 - questions/doubts says - ResolvableImpl
- is not in working condition, no code changes done to it.
Also, there is a mail
Some more questions-
8) are these the only ones? what should be int value to make it ON/OFF?
currently no matter what it is ON, like I put a \n in a attribute value and
loaded in DO and checked
the value there, it was always preserving \n
/**
* Line Break String such as \n, \r\n, \r and ,
Hi Amita, I think we must resort to the mailing list since IRC is
failing us, so I'm going to work through the issues and post here as I
go. It won't be as interactive as IRC ought to be, but it will be
better than the reality of IRC :-(
Regards, kelvin.
On 21/06/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL
Amita, I'm going to tackle your questions 1 by 1
On 19/06/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
In attempt to analyze JIRA-1317, I had some questions and would like to get
some
points clear.
1)Tuscany xmlHelperImpl have load() method where options can be passed in.
Why save()
snip/
2)Why ResolvableImpl is in tuscany-sdo-lib, should it not be in
tuscany-sdo-impl? As this class is
in tuscany-sdo-lib and not tuscany-sdo-impl, it can not make use of options
implementation in tuscany-sdo-impl,
as these impl classes are not visible in tuscany-sdo-lib.
snip/
Frank
3)What is meaning of below code in XMLDocumentImpl?
if (options instanceof Map)
{
Class resourceFactoryClass =
(Class)((Map)options).get(GENERATED_LOADER);
if (resourceFactoryClass != null)
{
try
{
Object resourceFactory =
4)To provide code fix, code will change in (this is what I have thought so
far)
*HelperProviderBase-HelperProviderImpl-HelperContextImpl - constructor to
have options,
*XMLHelperImpl-to have member defaultOptions.
*tuscany-sdo-lib -SDOUtil code - SDOUtil.setDefaultXMLOptions(options)
A typical
Jumping to Q7 as I need to do something else now for a while and this
is an easy one to answer. The SDOUtil in the impl project is what was
being used before Frank started on his improvements to the structure.
It still exists in deprecated sate to give people a chance to move
over. The impl
The options are moved to lib as well (see
org.apache.tuscany.sdo.api.SDOHelper.XMLOptions). Implementation of the
options needs to be in the impl project since they have EMF dependencies.
Frank.
kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/21/2007 05:23:56
AM:
snip/
2)Why ResolvableImpl
Hi,
I got the below mapping between Tuscany's XMLOptions and emf XMLResource
Options
Is this what is intended to be passed to in load method, i.e. is it expected
to
have this mapping and pass appropriate options set to the doLoad()? Also, we
have
multiple options for line formatting whereas there
Hi Amita,
Currently Tuscany SDO is not exposing all the EMF options for load and save.
Also it's not 1:1 mapping from SDO to EMF options. That's why all the supported
SDO options are described in the
org.apache.tuscany.sdo.api.SDOHelper$XMLOptions. In order to add more options
to SDO, you
Amita,
This part of your mapping is wrong:
XML_SAVE_LINE_BREAK OPTION_FORMATTED
XML_SAVE_INDENT OPTION_FORMATTED
XML_SAVE_MARGIN OPTION_FORMATTED
These options don't map to anything in EMF. They are Tuscany defined
options which are processed in SDOXMLResourceImpl.
Frank.
Fuhwei Lwo [EMAIL
Hi,
In attempt to analyze JIRA-1317, I had some questions and would like to get
some
points clear.
1)Tuscany xmlHelperImpl have load() method where options can be passed in.
Why save() methods with
XMLDocument only have options supported and not for save() methods with
DataObject?
2)Why
16 matches
Mail list logo
