Re: [Cross Subproject Discussion] options for SDO Java in Apache

2008-02-11 Thread kelvin goodson
Ron, many thanks for your response; it's really helpful to get your suggestions. We certainly intend to make use of a significant body of tests that exist in Tuscany. I can open up another thread to specifically call out for an understanding of users' dependencies on a) the Tuscany API we have

Re: [Cross Subproject Discussion] options for SDO Java in Apache

2008-02-11 Thread Ron Gavlin
I think consolidating the two SDO implementations under a single implementation would be good for the entire Apache SDO community. My concern would be that no Tuscany SDO features be lost in the transition. The new implementation should provide most of what I can currently achieve using both EMF