Re: AW: Evolution of a specific SDO structure over time

2007-05-29 Thread kelvin goodson
Betreff: Re: Evolution of a specific SDO structure over time Hi Daniel, I guess it would be OK, but the downside of making it a default option (i.e., always do it) is that the SDO loader will then pretty much never fail - you'll be able to load any junk without getting any load errors. The other

Re: Evolution of a specific SDO structure over time

2007-05-25 Thread Daniel Peter
Hi Frank It works if the following line is added to the configureXMLResource method of class DataObjectUtil: resource.getDefaultLoadOptions().put(XMLResource.OPTION_RECORD_UNKNOWN_FEATURE,Boolean.TRUE); Could you add this? Regards, Daniel. __ Kennt

Re: Evolution of a specific SDO structure over time

2007-05-25 Thread Frank Budinsky
Hi Daniel, I guess it would be OK, but the downside of making it a default option (i.e., always do it) is that the SDO loader will then pretty much never fail - you'll be able to load any junk without getting any load errors. The other alternative is to expose the RECORD_UNKNOWN_FEATURE option

Re: Evolution of a specific SDO structure over time

2007-05-25 Thread Ron Gavlin
Subject: Re: Evolution of a specific SDO structure over time Hi Daniel, I guess it would be OK, but the downside of making it a default option (i.e., always do it) is that the SDO loader will then pretty much never fail - you'll be able to load any junk without getting any load errors. The other

AW: Evolution of a specific SDO structure over time

2007-05-25 Thread Daniel Peter
] An: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org Gesendet: Freitag, den 25. Mai 2007, 16:30:52 Uhr Betreff: Re: Evolution of a specific SDO structure over time Hi Daniel, I guess it would be OK, but the downside of making it a default option (i.e., always do it) is that the SDO loader will then pretty much never

Re: AW: Evolution of a specific SDO structure over time

2007-05-25 Thread Frank Budinsky
Betreff: Re: Evolution of a specific SDO structure over time Hi Daniel, I guess it would be OK, but the downside of making it a default option (i.e., always do it) is that the SDO loader will then pretty much never fail - you'll be able to load any junk without getting any load errors

Re: Evolution of a specific SDO structure over time

2007-05-24 Thread Frank Budinsky
Hi Daniel, My guess is that the underlying EMF XML loader already has options to support this. Someone (you? :-) just needs to figure out what options need to be exposed to SDO clients, or even turned on by default, to make it work in Tuscany. Frank. Daniel Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on