On 16/07/07, haleh mahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kelvin,
1. As Ant pointed out, Release note needs to be updated to capture the
very
important announcement that was made for SDO Tuscany and that is
completion
of SDO spec 2.1.
sure
2. Tuscany 1143 was identified as an unresolved defect
Raymond,
I'm going to reference your request in thread that is determining release
contents. I added a comment to 1436. Will you be able to provide a fix for
either of these in the short term?
Kelvin.
On 16/07/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to see the following
Hi Kelvin,
1. As Ant pointed out, Release note needs to be updated to capture the very
important announcement that was made for SDO Tuscany and that is completion
of SDO spec 2.1.
2. Tuscany 1143 was identified as an unresolved defect for Beta. Should this
be addressed in 1.0 or can it be moved
Hi,
I would like to see the following JIRAs fixed before the 1.0 release.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1110
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1436
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tuscany Users
Hi
I'd like to see the stax dependency issue resolved, otherwise we
are going to have issues with DAS and possibly CTS releases that are
based on SDO 1.0 release.
On 7/15/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to see the following JIRAs fixed before the 1.0 release.
Thanks for looking at this ant ...
snip/
NOTICE file still contains the incubating disclaimer
will fix
RELEASE_NOTES should have a sentence or 2 at the top saying, in a nutshell,
what is SDO. maybe also rather than saying just '...is a superset of
previous release... make it sound a bit
