Re: Tuscany development status

2007-01-02 Thread Francesco Furfari
Thank you Jean-Sebastian, I was supposing that it wasn't so easy to answer, especially to my last question, but it didn't discourage me from continuing ;-). Just to inform you, there was general consensus respect the SCA initiative, as well as caution because the work is still in progress.

Re: Tuscany development status

2007-01-02 Thread Jim Marino
On Jan 2, 2007, at 6:04 AM, Francesco Furfari wrote: Thank you Jean-Sebastian, I was supposing that it wasn't so easy to answer, especially to my last question, but it didn't discourage me from continuing ;-). Just to inform you, there was general consensus respect the SCA initiative, as

Re: Tuscany development status

2007-01-02 Thread Francesco Furfari
Jim Marino wrote: On Jan 2, 2007, at 6:04 AM, Francesco Furfari wrote: Thank you Jean-Sebastian, I was supposing that it wasn't so easy to answer, especially to my last question, but it didn't discourage me from continuing ;-). Just to inform you, there was general consensus respect the

Re: Tuscany development status

2007-01-01 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Francesco Furfari wrote: Hello, I'm trying to push for the adoption of SCA model (Tuscany) in a project whose development activities will start on the second quarter of the next year. Next week there will be a meeting in which I would like to summarize the status of Tuscany project. In

Tuscany development status

2006-12-15 Thread Francesco Furfari
Hello, I'm trying to push for the adoption of SCA model (Tuscany) in a project whose development activities will start on the second quarter of the next year. Next week there will be a meeting in which I would like to summarize the status of Tuscany project. In particular, I would like to