Re: SDO Java 1.0-incubating release candidate 1
On 16/07/07, haleh mahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Kelvin, 1. As Ant pointed out, Release note needs to be updated to capture the very important announcement that was made for SDO Tuscany and that is completion of SDO spec 2.1. sure 2. Tuscany 1143 was identified as an unresolved defect for Beta. Should this be addressed in 1.0 or can it be moved to post 1.0? I think it's an important one for 1.0 as our runtime metadata organisation is rather messy without this and I think it will probably bite us if we don't. 3. some of the links on this page do not work: C:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incubating\docs\javadoc\sdo-samples\index.html thanks, I'll check it out. 4. Is commentary_for_x the level of trace? If yes, would it make sense to change the name to trace_detailed, trace_medium, trace_low? Two comments here. I'm not sure how esoteric the term trace here is. It's very familiar to me, but for someone who has never encountered the term it may not instantly convey the message, whereas I think what I have used does. The second is that it doesn't really do the full job that you might expect of trace. There's no entry/exit messages, no call stack depth representation, and it doesn't tell you anything about what's going on inside SDO; so someone who does understand the term trace might have different expectations. The commentary output conveys the temporal sequence of SDO API calls that must be made in a flattened fashion. 5. C:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incubating\docs\javadoc\sdo-samples\index.html.. javadoc for Class SampleBase. Are these SPIs that one would use to develop samples? If yes, the text reads as if this and the sampleInfra are not interesting to users. I'll take a peek at the pom and try to figure out how to exclude these 6. Samples Overview: a) In the overview parag you have a link to Tuscany main site for the section you say contribute pack to the project. It would be better if this linked to getInvolved page. thx b) You could remove the first sentence since it does not really make sense. How about .. Apache Tuscany SDO Samples are provided here to help users learn SDO.'index by SDO subproject ' lists the different samples available to you. These samples provide a starting point for learning SDO and can be extended and enhanced to experiment with other available SDO features. Please help us enhance these samples by sending your feedback to Tuscany mailing list or join us and contribute to this project get involved link. i'll review and incorporate 7. Running samples: can you modify the test to make it clear that BINARY-BASE is a variable that needs to be set in the script? For example... In order to run the samples, locate runSamples script file for the environment you work on under samples directory. Modify the file to point BINARY-BASE to the directory on your file system where lib and samples reside. You are then ready to run the samples. yes, I have a to do to make an improvement here (incidentally, I haven't run the runsamples.sh script since I don't yet have a linux environment since my hard drive failure, if someone could verify this it would be great) btw. I did this and I get an error. It complaints that it cannot find executeSamples class file. C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\samplesREM under the License. C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\samplesset BINARY_BASE= c:\sdoRel1\tuscan y-sdo-1.0-incubating C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\samplesset RELEASE=-1.0-incubating C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\samplesset LIB= c:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1. 0-incubating\lib C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\samplesset CLASSPATH= c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\sample-sdo--1.0-incubating.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1. 0-incubating\lib\sdo-api-r2.1--1.0-incubating.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-in cubating\lib\tuscany-sdo-lib--1.0-incubating.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-inc ubating\lib\tuscany-sdo-impl--1.0-incubating.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-inc ubating\lib\tuscany-sdo-tools--1.0-incubating.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-in cubating\lib\codegen-ecore-2.2.3.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\ codegen-2.2.3.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\ecore-2.2.3.jar; c: \sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\ecore-change-2.2.3.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tusca ny-sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\ecore-xmi-2.2.3.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incuba ting\lib\common-2.2.3.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\xsd-2.2.3.j ar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\stax-api-1.0.1.jar C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\samplesjava target.org.apache.tuscany.sam ples.sdo.ExecuteSamples Exception in thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: target/org/apache/tus cany/samples/sdo/ExecuteSamples yes, that would be as expected without having edited binary_base. I'm going to adopt ant's suggestion and set it to .. by default (or whatever works if you are in the local directory)
Re: SDO Java 1.0-incubating release candidate 1
Raymond, I'm going to reference your request in thread that is determining release contents. I added a comment to 1436. Will you be able to provide a fix for either of these in the short term? Kelvin. On 16/07/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I would like to see the following JIRAs fixed before the 1.0 release. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1110 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1436 Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tuscany Users tuscany-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 2:38 PM Subject: SDO Java 1.0-incubating release candidate 1 I've posted an RC1 of SDO Java 1.0-incubating at [1] Maven artifacts for the release candidate are available at [2] I cut a branch for this release at [3] Please take a look at this release candidate. There are a few more fixes due to go into the release, which should be ready by the end of this week, so there will be a respin of this candidate, but I'd particularly like to get feedback on the structure of the distribution, as a lot has changed in this respect since the beta1. Also please feed back on the install, build and run samples instructions since these have all changed too. Best Regards, Kelvin. [1] http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/1.0-incubating/RC1/ [2] http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/repo/ [3] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/branches/sdo-1.0-incubating/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SDO Java 1.0-incubating release candidate 1
Hi Kelvin, 1. As Ant pointed out, Release note needs to be updated to capture the very important announcement that was made for SDO Tuscany and that is completion of SDO spec 2.1. 2. Tuscany 1143 was identified as an unresolved defect for Beta. Should this be addressed in 1.0 or can it be moved to post 1.0? 3. some of the links on this page do not work: C:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incubating\docs\javadoc\sdo-samples\index.html 4. Is commentary_for_x the level of trace? If yes, would it make sense to change the name to trace_detailed, trace_medium, trace_low? 5. C:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incubating\docs\javadoc\sdo-samples\index.html.. javadoc for Class SampleBase. Are these SPIs that one would use to develop samples? If yes, the text reads as if this and the sampleInfra are not interesting to users. 6. Samples Overview: a) In the overview parag you have a link to Tuscany main site for the section you say contribute pack to the project. It would be better if this linked to getInvolved page. b) You could remove the first sentence since it does not really make sense. How about .. Apache Tuscany SDO Samples are provided here to help users learn SDO.'index by SDO subproject ' lists the different samples available to you. These samples provide a starting point for learning SDO and can be extended and enhanced to experiment with other available SDO features. Please help us enhance these samples by sending your feedback to Tuscany mailing list or join us and contribute to this project get involved link. 7. Running samples: can you modify the test to make it clear that BINARY-BASE is a variable that needs to be set in the script? For example... In order to run the samples, locate runSamples script file for the environment you work on under samples directory. Modify the file to point BINARY-BASE to the directory on your file system where lib and samples reside. You are then ready to run the samples. btw. I did this and I get an error. It complaints that it cannot find executeSamples class file. C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\samplesREM under the License. C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\samplesset BINARY_BASE= c:\sdoRel1\tuscan y-sdo-1.0-incubating C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\samplesset RELEASE=-1.0-incubating C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\samplesset LIB= c:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1. 0-incubating\lib C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\samplesset CLASSPATH= c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\sample-sdo--1.0-incubating.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1. 0-incubating\lib\sdo-api-r2.1--1.0-incubating.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-in cubating\lib\tuscany-sdo-lib--1.0-incubating.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-inc ubating\lib\tuscany-sdo-impl--1.0-incubating.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-inc ubating\lib\tuscany-sdo-tools--1.0-incubating.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-in cubating\lib\codegen-ecore-2.2.3.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\ codegen-2.2.3.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\ecore-2.2.3.jar; c: \sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\ecore-change-2.2.3.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tusca ny-sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\ecore-xmi-2.2.3.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incuba ting\lib\common-2.2.3.jar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\xsd-2.2.3.j ar; c:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\lib\stax-api-1.0.1.jar C:\sdoRel1\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating\samplesjava target.org.apache.tuscany.sam ples.sdo.ExecuteSamples Exception in thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: target/org/apache/tus cany/samples/sdo/ExecuteSamples 8. This link C:\sdoRel1\tuscany- sdo-1.0-incubating\samples\src\main\java\org\apache\tuscany\samples\sdo\advanced\package.html refers to main menu which does not exist. Also, shouldn't this be called Service Data Object Advanced Samples instead of Advanced Service Data Object Samples? Same issue with intermediate and basic package. 9. Nice detail in the index file. :) On 7/16/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Raymond, I'm going to reference your request in thread that is determining release contents. I added a comment to 1436. Will you be able to provide a fix for either of these in the short term? Kelvin. On 16/07/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I would like to see the following JIRAs fixed before the 1.0 release. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1110 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1436 Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tuscany Users tuscany-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 2:38 PM Subject: SDO Java 1.0-incubating release candidate 1 I've posted an RC1 of SDO Java 1.0-incubating at [1] Maven artifacts for the release candidate are available at [2] I cut a branch for this release at [3] Please take a look at this release candidate. There are a few more fixes due to go into the release, which should be ready by the end of this week, so there will be
Re: SDO Java 1.0-incubating release candidate 1
Hi, I would like to see the following JIRAs fixed before the 1.0 release. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1110 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1436 Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tuscany Users tuscany-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 2:38 PM Subject: SDO Java 1.0-incubating release candidate 1 I've posted an RC1 of SDO Java 1.0-incubating at [1] Maven artifacts for the release candidate are available at [2] I cut a branch for this release at [3] Please take a look at this release candidate. There are a few more fixes due to go into the release, which should be ready by the end of this week, so there will be a respin of this candidate, but I'd particularly like to get feedback on the structure of the distribution, as a lot has changed in this respect since the beta1. Also please feed back on the install, build and run samples instructions since these have all changed too. Best Regards, Kelvin. [1] http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/1.0-incubating/RC1/ [2] http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/repo/ [3] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/branches/sdo-1.0-incubating/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SDO Java 1.0-incubating release candidate 1
Hi I'd like to see the stax dependency issue resolved, otherwise we are going to have issues with DAS and possibly CTS releases that are based on SDO 1.0 release. On 7/15/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I would like to see the following JIRAs fixed before the 1.0 release. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1110 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1436 Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tuscany Users tuscany-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 2:38 PM Subject: SDO Java 1.0-incubating release candidate 1 I've posted an RC1 of SDO Java 1.0-incubating at [1] Maven artifacts for the release candidate are available at [2] I cut a branch for this release at [3] Please take a look at this release candidate. There are a few more fixes due to go into the release, which should be ready by the end of this week, so there will be a respin of this candidate, but I'd particularly like to get feedback on the structure of the distribution, as a lot has changed in this respect since the beta1. Also please feed back on the install, build and run samples instructions since these have all changed too. Best Regards, Kelvin. [1] http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/1.0-incubating/RC1/ [2] http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/repo/ [3] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/branches/sdo-1.0-incubating/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SDO Java 1.0-incubating release candidate 1
Thanks for looking at this ant ... snip/ NOTICE file still contains the incubating disclaimer will fix RELEASE_NOTES should have a sentence or 2 at the top saying, in a nutshell, what is SDO. maybe also rather than saying just '...is a superset of previous release... make it sound a bit more exciting somehow, this is the 1.0 release so its quite significant. sure, release notes was one thing on my agenda for the last changes, i also have to ensure the jira list is fully up to date Not sure you really need the EPL license in the src distro license/notice stax-api jar is included in lib dir so these days it seems like people want mention of it in the LICENSE file even though it uses the Apache License good point Should sdo-api jar be named tuscany-sdo-api i guess, so, -- will change it groupid of sdo-api should be org.apache.tuscany.sdo not commonj ditto Maybe a README in the bin distro samples folder when i run runsamples.bat i get Exception in thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/tuscany/samples/sdo/ExecuteSamples Ok thats as i'd not edited BINARY_BASE, but without the README i didn't know i should. sure, I'll add one. I think I mentioned it in the javadoc, but I guess the README is where you would look naturally first Could BINARY_BASE default to ..\ so it works out of the box if you run it from the samples folder? Or at lest output a msg saying BINARY_BASE needs to be set? yes, I'll do that (once fixed the actual sample seems pretty cool the way it tells you whats going on when you run it) thanks Has RAT been run against the distro's? not yet, will do ...ant
