Hello everyone,
thank you so much for your responses.
When I said efficient, I meant in terms of storage, both in a file for
saving maps if the user chooses to save, and in the computers memory.
Low memory programs=happy users. sometimes.
These responses have been really helpful, and I did
On 19/08/2019 00:55, nathan tech wrote:
Hi there,
So I am running over some coding ideas in my head for creating a map for
a game.
This map would expand based on how far the user explores.
I figure there are two ways to do this:
1: the list method:
map=[]
for x in range(3):
temp=[]
Hi there,
So I am running over some coding ideas in my head for creating a map for
a game.
This map would expand based on how far the user explores.
I figure there are two ways to do this:
1: the list method:
map=[]
for x in range(3):
temp=[]
for y in range(3):
nathan tech wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> So I am running over some coding ideas in my head for creating a map for
> a game.
>
> This map would expand based on how far the user explores.
>
> I figure there are two ways to do this:
>
> 1: the list method:
>
> map=[]
>
> for x in range(3):
>
>
On 19/08/2019 00:55, nathan tech wrote:
> Is this an efficient method compared to 1?
Efficient in what sense?
The amount of code to write?
The amount of computing resources used?
The speed - and does that matter in an interactive game like this?
--
Alan G
Author of the Learn to Program web
On 8/18/19 5:55 PM, nathan tech wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> So I am running over some coding ideas in my head for creating a map for
> a game.
>
> This map would expand based on how far the user explores.
>
> I figure there are two ways to do this:
>
> 1: the list method:
>
> map=[]
> for x in
