Bill Kendrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But yeah. Let's switch to 24 or 32bit depth.
Done. Now the colour buckets look much better, and even some of
the stamps have improved rendering. For instance, take a look at
the leaves on the cartoon grapes stamp (scaled up). The
Bill Kendrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We may also have to retranslate the color names.
Yes, the changed and new ones will need to be updated.
I'll wait until a couple of weeks before the next release before
contacting the translators. I have several other strings I
Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The Sky blue is actually that now, computed as the average
value of the sky in numerous images of the sky. (if you try
this, remember to allow for gamma) Likewise, tan and beige
were computed from many images.
The sky blue
On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 06:13, Karl Ove Hufthammer wrote:
Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
+#define VIDEO_BPP 15 // saves memory
This causes severe dithering artifacts. It's particularly visible
on the colour buckets, which look look *really* bad now.
Odd. Is your display actually
On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 06:29, Karl Ove Hufthammer wrote:
Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The Sky blue is actually that now, computed as the average
value of the sky in numerous images of the sky. (if you try
this, remember to allow for gamma) Likewise,
Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 06:29, Karl Ove Hufthammer wrote:
Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The Sky blue is actually that now, computed as the average
value of the sky in numerous images of the
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 03:41:55PM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
I tried to benchmark this, but the --playback option
doesn't seem to work. Does it word for anybody?
This feature hasn't been finished yet. I kinda put it on the back burner,
indefinitely. ;^)
(It was mostly for show at events
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 12:29:43PM +0100, Karl Ove Hufthammer wrote:
The sky blue looks a bit too grey. I'll play around with a bit.
I really like the tan and beige colours, by the way.
Me too.
One problem I noticed on my wife's laptop (with some of the new colors,
especially), was that the
Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 15:26, Karl Ove Hufthammer wrote:
Yes, I know. But that doesn't mean that a greyish blue is a
*good* colour to use for drawing cartoon-like sky in a
childrens' program. We don't need photo-realistic
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Popplewell
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 10:43 PM
To: Developmental mailing list for Tux Paint, a drawing program for
young children.
Subject: Re: [Tuxpaint-dev] [PATCH] misc fixes
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 06:49:50PM -0800, Bill Kendrick wrote
Mark K. Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I like these color names better than the previously defined
ones, but if we're going to change the names of the colors,
let's use the canonical names, perhaps adopting the color
names in /etc/X11/rgb.txt file. We may also have to
I kind of like this idea of submitting the patch to the list. 'Cuz we can
discuss it =)
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Albert Cahalan wrote:
[snip]
-CFLAGS=-O2 -Wall
+CFLAGS=-O2 -Wall -fno-common -ffast-math \
+ -W -Wall -Wcast-align -Wredundant-decls \
+-Wbad-function-cast -Wwrite-strings
I'm applying this in pieces...
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 06:54:21PM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
1. add some warning flags to the Makefile
Done. I see I have some code clean-up to do! I want there to be no
warnings whatsoever!
2. adjusts the colors (fixing bug #1053065)
Applied.
-bill!
To: Developmental mailing list for Tux Paint, a drawing program for
young children.
Subject: Re: [Tuxpaint-dev] [PATCH] misc fixes
I'm applying this in pieces...
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 06:54:21PM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
1. add some warning flags to the Makefile
Done. I see I have some code
On Sun, 2004-11-21 at 20:25, Mark K. Kim wrote:
Turning on extra error messages sounds good.
That's all you can turn on without...
a. being gcc version-specific
b. getting warnings for standard include files
c. going insane :-)
Regarding the last, there are a couple warnings that
may look
15 matches
Mail list logo
