Re: [U-Boot] MAKEALL ml507_flash return Not enough room for programheaders error

2008-11-03 Thread Ricardo
Hello Benny I have just checkout the build of the ml507_flash and works ok for me [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/curro/qtec/u-boot$ ./MAKEALL ml507_flash Configuring for ml507 board... textdata bss dec hex filename 202132 10476 30032 242640 3b3d0 ./u-boot I remember that

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Initial support for Nomadik 8815 development board

2008-11-03 Thread Alessandro Rubini
This is the initial port, with basic infrastructure and a working serial port. While rebasing in order to add drivers, I found I have whitespace and other stilistic errors. I'll post a fixed patch this night with those details fixed. /alessandro ___

[U-Boot] MT29F8G08MAAWC support in u-boot

2008-11-03 Thread Dimitar Penev
Hi Guys, Our Blackfin based system was successfully using MT29F2G08AABWP NAND flash and u-boot. Recently due to the limited availability we decided to migrate to the new nand chips from Micron MT29F8G08MAAWC It uses new technology Multi-Level Cell However we are still not able to make it

Re: [U-Boot] new board SDRAM conf

2008-11-03 Thread 조기성
Hi, thanks in your replay. I create My own board port(MFT board) . create configuration header and init.S But In the sdram.c(sdram_init-get_ram_size is 4 thus )func is failed , sdram is not founded . I think init.S is something wrong or CFG_MONITOR_BASE is wrong ... . maybe you can point

Re: [U-Boot] new board SDRAM conf

2008-11-03 Thread Stefan Roese
On Monday 03 November 2008, 조기성 wrote: I create My own board port(MFT board) . create configuration header and init.S But In the sdram.c(sdram_init-get_ram_size is 4 thus )func is failed , sdram is not founded . I think init.S is something wrong or CFG_MONITOR_BASE is wrong ... . maybe you

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] Update U-Boot's build timestamp on every compile

2008-11-03 Thread Peter Tyser
On Sat, 2008-11-01 at 03:26 -0700, Trent Piepho wrote: On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Peter Tyser wrote: +$(TIMESTAMP_FILE): + @( printf '#define U_BOOT_DATE %s\n' '$(shell date +%b %d %C%y)' \ +) $@ + @( printf '#define U_BOOT_TIME %s\n' '$(shell date +%T)' \

[U-Boot] [PATCH v5] Update U-Boot's build timestamp on every compile

2008-11-03 Thread Peter Tyser
Use the GNU 'date' command to auto-generate a new U-Boot timestamp on every compile. Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Changes since v1: * Split up U_BOOT_DATE define (date and time) into U_BOOT_DATE (day, month, year) and U_BOOT_TIME (time of day) defines * Updated all

Re: [U-Boot] Building u-boot for the AT91RM9200-EK circa 2008

2008-11-03 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Martin Hejnfelt, In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: ... 642D up and running, but the problem relies in the board specific flash.c file for the DK board. The difference is the ID that the two Why do you have to use this at all? Isn't the flash CFI conformant so the generic CFI

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] lcd: Let the board code show board-specific info cleanup

2008-11-03 Thread Peter Tyser
Hi Wolfgang, In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Allow tqm8xx.c to cleanly compile when CONFIG_LCD_INFO is defined and remove unneeded version.h from lcd.c Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- I noticed this when adding timestamp.h to tqm8xx.c. The Update U-Boot's

[U-Boot] CFI: flash_write_cfiword() slow

2008-11-03 Thread Jens Gehrlein
Hi list, having a look at function drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c::flash_write_cfiword(), I found that find_sector() is called twice when having AMD standard, extended or legacy device. The first time, when writing the command. The second time, when calling flash_full_status_check(). Maybe this is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 86xx: Make dram_size a phys_size_t

2008-11-03 Thread Jon Loeliger
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 17:13 -0500, Becky Bruce wrote: It's currently a long and should be phys_size_t. Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] Applied to u-boot-mpc86xx. Thanks, jdl ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 8641HPCN: Config file cleanup

2008-11-03 Thread Jon Loeliger
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 17:13 -0500, Becky Bruce wrote: There are several items in the config file that were hardcoded but that should really be based on other config options, since the regions are contiguous and depend on being so. This cleans that up a bit. Also, add BR_PHYS_ADDR() macro to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc8641: Stop supporting non-PCI_PNP configs

2008-11-03 Thread Jon Loeliger
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 17:14 -0500, Becky Bruce wrote: We don't actually ever do this, remove the code so we can stop maintaining it. Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] Applied to u-boot-mpc86xx. Thanks, jdl ___ U-Boot mailing list

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc8641: Make PCI and RIO mutually exclusive, fix non-PCI build

2008-11-03 Thread Jon Loeliger
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 17:14 -0500, Becky Bruce wrote: You can't actually have both, and with some coming changes to change the memory map for the board and support 36-bit physical, we need the extra BAT that is being consumed by having both. I also make non-PCI configs build cleanly, for the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] powerpc 86xx: Handle CCSR relocation earlier

2008-11-03 Thread Jon Loeliger
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 18:19 -0600, Becky Bruce wrote: Currently, the CCSR gets relocated while translation is enabled, meaning we need 2 BAT translations to get to both the old location and the new location. Also, the DEFAULT CCSR location has a dependency on the BAT that maps the FLASH

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] lib_ppc: Move trap_init to occur earlier

2008-11-03 Thread Jon Loeliger
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 17:14 -0500, Becky Bruce wrote: Doing trap_init immediately once we're running from RAM means we're no longer dependent on the physical location of the flash on non-BookE platforms. Before trap_init, those platforms switch to real mode and go to 0xfff00100 on exception.

Re: [U-Boot] [patch] U-Boot Firetux board support

2008-11-03 Thread Jürgen Schöw
Hi, thanks all for the comments. I will try to fix these. On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 13:57:25 +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 15:30 Fri 31 Oct , Juergen Schoew wrote: Hi U-Boot mailling list, This patchset adds a new ARM board with the NXP PNX8181 cpu to

Re: [U-Boot] new board SDRAM conf

2008-11-03 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Steven, On Monday 03 November 2008, 조기성 wrote: I Made my board config header, and using yosemite's init.S u-boot.lds, mft.c(Yosemite.c) Only change config header , but it's not working . You should create your own board port for this custom 440EP board. 1. First The difference of my

[U-Boot] [PATCH] bootvx: Cleanup improvements

2008-11-03 Thread Niklaus Giger
The following improvements are made: - document bootvx in README - fix size too small by one in sprintf - changed old (pre 2004) device name ibmEmac to emac - boot device may be overriden in board config - servername may be defined in board config - additional parameters may be defined in board

Re: [U-Boot] [patch] U-Boot Firetux board support

2008-11-03 Thread Jürgen Schöw
Hi Peter, On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:55:53 -0500, Peter Tyser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Jürgen, If you have any comments please email to me. You should add an entry to the MAINTAINERS file for the Firetux. OK, will be in the next cycle. Regards Jürgen Schöw -- Dipl.-Ing. Jürgen Schöw,

[U-Boot] [U-boot-Users][GIT PULL] Please pull coldfire tree

2008-11-03 Thread John Rigby
Wolfgang, The following changes since commit 3ec53148eb68ddfb0c3311fb4c06cd2bd0ef3eeb: Wolfgang Denk (1): Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-nand-flash are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-coldfire master TsiChung Liew (9):

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] bootvx: Cleanup improvements

2008-11-03 Thread Niklaus Giger
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: On 10:54 Mon 03 Nov , Niklaus Giger wrote: The following improvements are made: - document bootvx in README - fix size too small by one in sprintf - changed old (pre 2004) device name ibmEmac to emac - boot device may be overriden in board config

Re: [U-Boot] [patch] U-Boot Firetux board support

2008-11-03 Thread Scott Wood
Jürgen Schöw wrote: This seems to be similair to the Steppingstone bootloader from Samsung. This SPL is already in the eeprom of the system and will be (hopefully) integrated in the cpu rom mask for the next revision. If I see it correct, I have to define the whole parameterset for the NAND

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] bootvx: Cleanup improvements

2008-11-03 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 10:54 Mon 03 Nov , Niklaus Giger wrote: The following improvements are made: - document bootvx in README - fix size too small by one in sprintf - changed old (pre 2004) device name ibmEmac to emac - boot device may be overriden in board config - servername may be defined in board

Re: [U-Boot] CFI: flash_write_cfiword() slow

2008-11-03 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jens Gehrlein, In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: find_sector() loops through the sector table from the last sector to the current sector. And the more sectors the device has, the slower the algorithm becomes. And this process for every sector to be programmed. And yes, there are

Re: [U-Boot] Building u-boot for the AT91RM9200-EK circa 2008

2008-11-03 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Martin Hejnfelt, In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Why do you have to use this at all? Isn't the flash CFI conformant so the generic CFI flash driver would work? ... I must say, I'm still really new to U-boot so I'm not sure if I my answer is the best method. The flash circuit

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] bootvx: Cleanup improvements

2008-11-03 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Niklaus Giger, In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: The following improvements are made: - document bootvx in README - fix size too small by one in sprintf - changed old (pre 2004) device name ibmEmac to emac - boot device may be overriden in board config - servername may be

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/13 v5] ARM: OMAP3: Add support for some of TIs ARM-Cortex A8 OMAP3 boards

2008-11-03 Thread Dirk Behme
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: On 19:34 Sun 02 Nov , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Subject: [PATCH 00/13 v5] ARM: OMAP3: Add support for some of TIs ARM-Cortex A8 OMAP3 boards This patch series adds U-Boot v1 support for some of TI's ARM-Cortex A8 based OMAP3 boards. These are

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/13 v5] ARM: OMAP3: Add I2C support

2008-11-03 Thread Dirk Behme
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: On 19:38 Sun 02 Nov , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Subject: [PATCH 09/13 v5] ARM: OMAP3: Add I2C support From: Dirk Behme [EMAIL PROTECTED] Add I2C support Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Changes in version v5: - Split functional

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 03/13 v5] ARM: OMAP3: Add ARM Cortex A8 common directory

2008-11-03 Thread Dirk Behme
Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED], In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: --===1314021165== From: Dirk Behme [EMAIL PROTECTED] Add ARM Cortex A8 common directory Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... +static void cp_delay(void) +{ + volatile int

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4]v2: Document CONFIG_SYS parameters for vxworks

2008-11-03 Thread Niklaus Giger
The following improvements are made and tested on my HCUx boards: README - document bootvx and CONFIG_SYS_VXWORKS parameters vxworks.h - add new vxworks.h with some default definitions cmd_elf.c - fix size too small by one in sprintf - changed old (pre 2004) device name ibmEmac to emac - boot

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4]v2: Add vxworks.h to handle CONFIG_SYS_VXWORKS parameters

2008-11-03 Thread Niklaus Giger
Signed-off-by: Niklaus Giger [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- include/vxworks.h | 53 + 1 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/vxworks.h diff --git a/include/vxworks.h b/include/vxworks.h new file mode 100644

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4]v2: Cleanup bootvx and handle new CONFIG_SYS_VXWORKS parameters

2008-11-03 Thread Niklaus Giger
Signed-off-by: Niklaus Giger [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- common/cmd_elf.c | 81 -- 1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/cmd_elf.c b/common/cmd_elf.c index 3ebb6d9..27a4b73 100644 --- a/common/cmd_elf.c +++

[U-Boot] Undefined reference to `boot_relocate_fdt'

2008-11-03 Thread Juan Pablo Gómez
His I'm trying to build u-boot for a xupv2p board, but with the newest version this is appearing during the make : * $make xupv2p_config $make* -Map u-boot.map -o u-boot common/libcommon.a(cmd_bootm.o): In function `do_bootm_subcommand':

Re: [U-Boot] Building u-boot for the AT91RM9200-EK circa 2008

2008-11-03 Thread Pink Boy
Wolfgang Denk sez, The thing is: we will not accept any such (new) code for mainline. And switching to using the CFI driver is trivial. Okay so what I've learned. 1)You can build the AT91RM9200DK version of u-boot with u-boot-1.3.4 and it works. At least I got a prompt. So one can use the

Re: [U-Boot] Building u-boot for the AT91RM9200-EK circa 2008

2008-11-03 Thread James Black
I just checked the ATMEL website and it appears to me that the AT91RM9200 is alive and well. Distributors are maintainig stock... Why do you say that the Chip has been abandoned? On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Pink Boy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wolfgang Denk sez, The thing is: we will not

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/13 v5] ARM: OMAP3: Add I2C support

2008-11-03 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Dirk Behme, In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: +#define inb(a) __raw_readb(a) +#define outb(a, v) __raw_writeb(a, v) #define inw(a) __raw_readw(a) #define outw(a,v) __raw_writew(a,v) This 4 macro is supposed to be defined in io.h Even if I have to touch a global/common

Re: [U-Boot] Building u-boot for the AT91RM9200-EK circa 2008

2008-11-03 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Pink Boy, In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: At least I have I have some sort of peg in the ground to start with. Right now I worry about trying to get the CFI to work because as a noob I'm in the dark on a lot of things If you're in the dark, you can still admire the many,

[U-Boot] [PATCH] [OneNAND] bad block aware read/write support

2008-11-03 Thread Kyungmin Park
Update OneNAND command to support bad block awareness Also change the OneNAND command styel like NAND Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- diff --git a/common/cmd_onenand.c b/common/cmd_onenand.c index 8d87b78..1eca9b0 100644 --- a/common/cmd_onenand.c +++ b/common/cmd_onenand.c @@

[U-Boot] [PATCH] [OneNAND] Sync with 2.6.27

2008-11-03 Thread Kyungmin Park
Sync with OneNAND kernel codes Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- diff --git a/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c index 9b7bf3a..66214e8 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c @@ -78,20 +78,11

Re: [U-Boot] Undefined reference to `boot_relocate_fdt'

2008-11-03 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Juan Pablo Gómez wrote: His I'm trying to build u-boot for a xupv2p board, but with the newest version this is appearing during the make : * $make xupv2p_config $make* -Map u-boot.map -o u-boot common/libcommon.a(cmd_bootm.o): In function `do_bootm_subcommand':

[U-Boot] [PATCH] sh: Migo-R: Update BSC value

2008-11-03 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
A value of BSC CS4 was wrong, Fixed it. Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- board/renesas/MigoR/lowlevel_init.S | 32 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/renesas/MigoR/lowlevel_init.S

Re: [U-Boot] MAKEALL ml507_flash return Not enough room for programheaders error

2008-11-03 Thread Benny Chen
Hi Ricardo, Changing my tool chain to the ELDK 4.2 ppc-linux-x86 does build the default ml507_flash project. However, because my hardware design does not map the FLASH chip to 0xFE00 but to 0x8600 the build failed with the following error. /**/

Re: [U-Boot] U-boot support for Non Console board

2008-11-03 Thread rajeev s
hi Ira Snyder, Thanks for the respone. The solution mentioned looks feasible.. Could you please send the U-boot patch in the current shape .. Shall test the same patch with modifications as required to support our board. Thanks again . Rajeev S Ira Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Oct

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3][ppc4xx] Changed PPC4xx EMAC driver to require CONFIG_PPC4xx_EMAC

2008-11-03 Thread Ben Warren
All in-tree IBM/AMCC PPC4xx boards using the EMAC get this new CONFIG Signed-off-by: Ben Warren [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Rebased against 4xx tree. Please test and ACK/NAK. cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_enet.c|9 - cpu/ppc4xx/Makefile |1 + include/configs/AR405.h

[U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx: Improve the performance of DDR memory

2008-11-03 Thread Dave Liu
From: Howard Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] modify the CAS timings. my understanding is that these settings decrease various wait times in the DDR interface. Because these wait times are in clock cycles, and the DDR clock on the 8315 RDB runs slower than on some other 83xx platforms, we can dial down

[U-Boot] mini-pci wireless driver

2008-11-03 Thread Lance Zhang
Hi, I am going to write a mini-pci driver (GIGABYTE MiniPCI Wireless Adapter: GN-WI01GS) for u-boot(sc520), Currently, I have Linux driver source code (downloaded from http://web.ralinktech.com/ralink/Home/Support/Linux.html RT61

[U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx: enable eLBC NAND support for MPC8315ERDB board

2008-11-03 Thread Dave Liu
Signed-off-by: Dave Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- include/configs/MPC8315ERDB.h | 12 +++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/MPC8315ERDB.h b/include/configs/MPC8315ERDB.h index 1225270..64bb62a 100644 --- a/include/configs/MPC8315ERDB.h +++

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3][ppc4xx] Moved PPC4xx EMAC driver to drivers/net

2008-11-03 Thread Ben Warren
Signed-off-by: Ben Warren [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Rebased against 4xx tree. Please test and ACK/NAK. cpu/ppc4xx/Makefile|1 - {cpu/ppc4xx = drivers/net}/4xx_enet.c |0 drivers/net/Makefile |1 + 3 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3][ppc4xx] Moved initialization of PPC4xx EMAC to cpu_eth_init()

2008-11-03 Thread Ben Warren
Removed initialization of the driver from net/eth.c Signed-off-by: Ben Warren [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Rebased against 4xx tree. Please test and ACK/NAK. cpu/ppc4xx/cpu.c | 14 ++ include/netdev.h |1 + net/eth.c|4 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4